1. Self-Expanding Metallic Stents Versus Surgical Intervention as Palliative Therapy for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
- Author
-
Koji Okabayashi, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Yuko Kitagawa, Hidena Takahashi, Masashi Yahagi, and Masashi Tsuruta
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Palliative care ,Colorectal cancer ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Anastomosis, Surgical ,Palliative Care ,Perforation (oil well) ,Hazard ratio ,Self Expandable Metallic Stents ,Colostomy ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Self-expandable metallic stent ,medicine ,Humans ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business ,Colectomy ,Intestinal Obstruction ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Although self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are useful tools for relieving large bowel obstructions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), their efficacy in a palliative setting has not been validated. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility of SEMS as a palliation for unresectable CRC patients with bowel obstructions and to determine their contribution to the prognosis of CRC, compared with surgical intervention. We conducted a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. We selected all controlled trials that compared SEMS with surgical interventions as palliative treatments in unresectable obstructive CRC patients. The primary outcome was early complications, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, other morbidities, and long-term survival rates. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. SEMS significantly reduced the risk of early complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.34; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.58 %; P
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF