Search

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare single-dose ertapenem (ERT) with the 3-day regime of ciprofloxacin (CIP) for prophylaxis of possible infections following transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: Data from a consecutive group of 542 patients from January 2012 to January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. As preinterventional prophylaxis patient group A (179) received 500 mg CIP twice a day for three days, beginning on the day before the biopsy (until June 2013); group B (363) received a single dose of ERT 60 min prior to intervention. The first follow-up examination for all patients was between post-intervention days 2 and 3. The second follow-up examination was between day 15 and 30 following biopsy. Urine was cultured in all cases and any adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the antibiotic treatment were noted. We also recorded all clinically relevant morbidities requiring intervention (ischuria, macrohaematuria, symptomatic urinary tract infections and urosepsis), as well as those not requiring active intervention (macrohaematuria, decreased urinary stream, pain, haemospermia). The main study criterion was the symptomatic urinary tract infection rate and ADRs. Results: All 542 biopsied patients could be included in the study and the drop-out rate was zero. There were no significant differences between groups A and B with regards to complications not requiring intervention. There was, however, a significant reduction from 14.5% (group A) to 0.8% (group B) in infectious complications. This showed a significant correlation in favour of ERT ( p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the ERT group there was also a distinct and significant reduction ( p > 0.001) in the number of patients with bacteriuria (>10e4 cfu per ml urine) without fever (0.5%) compared to the CIP group (12.3%). Conclusion: A single-dose of 1 g of intravenous ERT applied 1 h before a scheduled transrectal prostate biopsy is a safe option and provides effective protection against infection-related complications arising from surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prospective, randomized trial in which 236 patients received oral levofloxacin, either at 600 mg/day for 1 day ( n=124) or 300 mg/day for 3 days ( n=112). Urinalysis, plasma white blood cell count (WBC) (per mm3), and C reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dl) levels were checked before prostate biopsy (PBX), on the day after PBX, and on the seventh day after PBX. Two patients (1.61%) who received 600 mg for 1 day and 2 patients (1.79%) who received 300 mg for 3 days had febrile infectious complications. There was no statistically significant difference between levofloxacin at 600 mg for 1 day and levofloxacin at 300 mg for 3 days regarding the elevation of WBC and CRP. We can perform PBX safely with levofloxacin at 600 mg for 1 day as prophylaxis and recommend this method from the point of view of the decrease of antibiotic-resistant strains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]