Search

To compare the clinical efficacy of the minimally invasive technique and the open method in the treatment of irreducible unilateral subaxial cervical facet joint dislocation (SCFD). From March 2015 to September 2018, 62 patients with unilateral SCFD were studied. The cases were divided into 2 groups based on different surgery strategies. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group, and 31 patients were enrolled in the open surgery group. The duration of prone position operation, blood loss, and total hospitalization costs were recorded. The clinical effects were evaluated using visual analogue scale scores, the Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores at each follow-up. In addition, the segmental Cobb angle and intervertebral height were recorded and compared. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, prone position operation duration, and total hospital costs in the MIS group were significantly lower than in the open surgery group. The visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores of the 2 groups significantly improved after the operation. A satisfactory fusion rate was obtained in both groups, and the segmental Cobb angle and intervertebral height scores in both groups improved significantly. Minimally invasive reduction had equal clinical efficacy to posterior open surgery. However, MIS was less invasive and had lower costs. Therefore, it is a potential option in the treatment of SCFD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An optimized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program is lacking for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact and feasibility of an optimized ERAS pathway in patients with surgically treated AIS. In total, 79 patients with AIS who underwent corrective surgery without 3-column osteotomy were recruited from Xijing Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University between 2012 and 2018. Forty-four patients were treated according to a traditional protocol and 35 were managed using an optimized ERAS pathway, which was designed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team. The following data were collected and retrospectively analyzed, demographic characteristics, Cobb angle, curve type (Lenke), surgical duration, fusion level, correction rate, estimated blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin level, postoperative pain score, pain relief time, hemovac drainage, drainage removal time, first ambulation time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between the traditional and ERAS groups with respect to demographic characteristics, Cobb angle, curve type (Lenke), fusion level, and correction rate. However, the ERAS group had a shorter surgical duration, less blood loss and hemovac drainage, a higher postoperative hemoglobin level, and earlier pain relief, ambulation, and discharge. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting were lower in the ERAS group than in the traditional group. The ERAS pathway is capable of improving the perioperative status of patients with AIS by offering stronger analgesia, faster ambulation, and earlier discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]