1. The 'Parachute' Technique for the Endoscopic Repair of High-Flow Anterior Skull-Base CSF Leaks
- Author
-
Giulio Bertani, Claudio Guastella, Giulia Letizia Gribaudi, Andrea Di Cristofori, Giorgio Fiore, Giovanni Marfia, Leonardo Tariciotti, Giovanna Mantovani, Giorgio Carrabba, and Marco Locatelli
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Leak ,rhinorrhea ,Sphenoidal sinus ,business.industry ,Fistula ,Cribriform plate ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cerebrospinal fluid ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Etiology ,Cribriform ,Medicine ,Neurology (clinical) ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective This study aims to assess the feasibility and reliability of our endoscopic trans-nasal technique for the repair of cribriform and sellar high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Methods A comparison between patients suffering from high-flow rhinorrhea and treated through a free grafting endoscopic technique or the “parachute” technique, our nasal packing proposal, was performed. Results Thirty-three patients were included. The mean age was 52 years (range: 36–68 years). The etiology of the CSF leaks was iatrogenic in 16 cases (48.5%), traumatic in 5 cases (15.2%), spontaneous in 11 cases (33.3%), and related to anterior skull base tumors in 1 case (3%). The bone defect affected the sphenoidal sinus in 20 cases (60.6%), the cribriform plate of the ethmoid in 10 cases (30.3%), and both the sphenoid and ethmoid in 3 cases (9.1%). The mean size of bone defects was 8.5 ± 3.9 mm. The median follow-up was 28 (64) months. A CSF leak recurrence occurred in no cases treated with the parachute technique and in 3 cases that underwent conventional endoscopic treatments. The CSF leak recurrences were associated with 2 iatrogenic and 1 post-traumatic fistula. All the CSF leak recurrences underwent the parachute technique, not showing second recurrences. Conclusions Our results suggest that the parachute technique is simple, safe, and effective. We recommend it as an alternative treatment to vascular flaps for the treatment of high-flow and recurrent fistulas.
- Published
- 2021