Search

Background: In accordance with technique advancement and minimal invasiveness surgical approaches, the minipterional has progressively replaced the standard pterional approach for treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. Nowadays, multimodal intraoperative resources including microDoppler and microflow probes, indocyanine green videoangiography, and neurophysiologic monitoring constitute a fundamental prerequisite for increasing the safety of the clipping procedure. Our study investigated and compared in a single-center experience the effect of the evolution of a minimally invasive and multimodal approach in unruptured MCA aneurysm surgery by measuring postoperative complication rate, recovery time, and long-term neuropsychological and functional outcomes., Methods: One hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent surgical treatment for unruptured MCA aneurysms at our institution were evaluated retrospectively. Patients' clinical, radiologic, and surgical reports were collected. Cognitive evaluation and quality of life were assessed through validated tests in telephone interviews. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into 2 groups: "PT (pterional)" and "MPT (minipterional).", Results: Ninety-two patients were included in the analysis. A significant reduction of postoperative complication rates and new-onset postoperative seizures was recorded in the MPT group (P value = 0.006). Severe cognitive deficits were lower in the MPT group, although without a clear statistical correlation., Conclusions: Decreased complication rates, faster recovery time, and a trend toward better cognitive and functional performances were documented for the MPT group of patients. In our experience, the minipterional approach with multimodality-assisted microsurgery reduced neurologic complications and recovery time and improved long-term cognitive outcome and quality of life., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disease that involves above all the spine and the pelvis. In the spine, the inflammatory processes cause the formation of syndesmophytes between the vertebral bodies and the ossification of ligaments, with bony overgrowth. In this setting, dysphagia is a rare but severe complication and only a few cases have been reported in the literature., Case Description: We describe the case of a 50-year-old man suffering from AS, with a 6-month history of severe dysphagia caused by bone compression of the esophagus at the C3-5 level. Because the patient underwent a 10-kg weight loss 2 months after clinical onset, a gastrostomy tube placement was needed. Complete surgical excision of the bone overgrowth via an anterior cervical approach was performed, but despite continuous intensive swallowing rehabilitation therapy, the patient failed to improve in the first following months. Surprisingly, the patient started to improve 18 months after the operation, with a complete recovery from dysphagia 24 months after., Conclusions: Among the 5 reports (including the present case) available in the current literature with a clear dysphagia recovery follow-up, the present case (the second one harboring gastrostomy) is associated with the slowest complete recovery published so far. This unusually late recovery suggests a possible role not only of the mechanical decompression of the esophagus but also of the degeneration/regeneration ratio of the myenteric plexus, along with local neurotransmitters sensitivity changes, to better understand the dysphagia recovery time course of this unique patient., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The introduction of operative microscopes (OMs) is the most important revolution in modern microneurosurgery, as a result of the implementation of lighting and magnification of the surgical field and of the capability to dissect the microneurovascular structures. Recently, the advent of video telescopic intraoperative microscopes or exoscopes (EX) has enlarged these perspectives in neurosurgery., Objective: To systematically review all the pertinent literature., Methods: We systematically reviewed the pertinent literature and collected all the reported experience with EX use in neurosurgery. Quantitative and qualitative data, along with the authors' opinions and concerns, were recorded and analyzed. A comparison with the OM was also considered., Results: Twenty-nine studies reporting surgical procedures on 574 patients were included in the study. Data analysis was categorized in 3 groups, representing technical, surgical, and educational aspects. The EX is largely considered superior or equivalent to OM in many features, such as the surgeon's ergonomic comfort, educational opportunities, image quality, magnification, lighting, and costs. However, some surgeons still prefer the OM, especially for its better stereoscopic vision., Conclusions: The EX has been emerging as an alternative to the OM for performing many cranial, spinal, and peripheral neurosurgical procedures. Despite some limitations, this new optical device presents many features that can be considered as an evolution of the OM. In future years, larger studies will confirm these preliminary impressions., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We describe the case of a 33-year-old woman with a history of over 15 years of a slow growing firm osseous-like right retroauricular mass. Surgical resection was easily performed using a sharp technique, because of a clear cleavage plane. The histologic diagnosis was a rare, unexpected, protuberant fibro-osseous lesion named "Bullough lesion." Only few cases of this benign pathologic entity have been described in English literature. Clinical differential diagnosis must be done with osteoma, periosteal chondroma, and other fibro-osseous lesions such as fibrodysplasia and ossifying fibroma. Because of the paucity of data, the natural history of this lesion is unknown and serial clinical and radiological follow-up is advised., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite recent treatment developments, back pain and related disabilities still represent a challenge for practitioners. Among the available surgical techniques, many different features and outcomes have been investigated; however, aesthetic result was missing among them. The present investigation was designed to prospectively compare patient-oriented aesthetic results after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard open surgery (SOS) for the lumbar spine., Methods: This was a prospective observational study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent SOS were assigned to group 1 and MIS to group 2. Patient-oriented aesthetic result evaluation was collected using a dedicated visual aesthetic analogue scale. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to exclude objective underlying influencing factors. The Oswestry Disability Index and a 10-point itemized visual analogue scale for back pain were administered to assess the clinical and functional status. Follow-up data were collected before discharge at 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant., Results: We enrolled 74 patients, 44 in group 1 and 30 in group 2. The 2 groups were homogeneous for demographic and clinical data. No clinical or functional differences were measured at the end of follow-up. Visual aesthetic analogue scale reported greater mean values in group 1 at every follow-up time., Conclusions: Patients seem to prefer the aesthetic result from a single midline incision after SOS compared with MIS. The use of specific techniques could be considered if there is scientific evidence reporting greater aesthetic outcome, having similar clinical and functional ones., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been providing many solutions in spine surgery, and several technical variations and instrumentation systems are available. The aim of our study is to investigate the best system to perform a hybrid technique in lumbar spine fusion procedures., Methods: Sixteen patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 groups reported later. The first step in any case was midline incision, fascia exposure, and, using trocars, intravertebral transpedicle Kirschner wires (KWs) positioning through the fascia. Group definitions were A) KWs were affixed to surgical towels; B) screws with metal extensors were placed and KWs removed; C) screws with plastic extensors (K2M) were placed and those extensors were affixed to surgical towels; and D) screws without extensors or tulips (Nuvasive) were positioned. We locked the system at the end of procedure, after posterior decompression and translumbar interbody fusion cage placement. Procedures' features were rated using properly designed questionnaires by surgeons., Results: Metal extensors were rated lower than other systems in any aspect. C and D groups' procedures were higher rated than those in A and B in all examined fields. Furthermore, group D's procedures were reported more comfortable during facetectomy, diskectomy, and cage placement. Surgeons reported Precept Modular (Nuvasive) as the most comfortable and useful system in the hybrid technique., Conclusions: Precept Modular seems to be the most useful system when performing hybrid technique in lumbar fusion procedures. Furthermore, it results in the only one that provides the opportunity to easily and quickly switch from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery, avoiding muscles' injuries., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to quantify the discrepancy between intraoperative and postoperative segmental lordosis in patients operated on for lumbar degenerative diseases, with 3 different fixation techniques: open posterolateral instrumentation alone (PLI) or in association with lumbar interbody cages (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF] or extreme lateral interbody fusion [XLIF])., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients affected by single-segment degenerative spondylotic disease who underwent PLI alone or percutaneous posterolateral instrumentation (pPLI) in association with TLIF or XLIF between April 2015 and December 2017 at our institution. Group I included patients who underwent PLI with transpedicular screws and rods, interlaminar bilateral decompression, and posterolateral fusion with autologous bone chips. Group II included patients treated with pPLI + TLIF using a complete unilateral arthrectomy. Group III included patients operated on with minimally invasive retroperitoneal pPLI + XLIF., Results: No major complications were reported. The mean segmental loss of lordosis values ranged from 9.17% to 12.28% in Group I, from 6.31%-9.43% in Group II, and from 3.05%-4.71% in Group III. The statistical analysis revealed that pPLI + XLIF maintained a higher segmental lordosis than PLI and pPLI +TLIF in each operated segment (P < 0.05). pPLI + TLIF was more effective than PLI in reducing the loss of lordosis at L4-L5 and at L5-S1 (P < 0.05) but not at L3-L4 (P = 0.12)., Conclusions: The documented mismatch between the preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis might affect the clinical outcome. Its relevance depends on the surgical technique used at the single level., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)