Search

Research Objectives: Definition of regular editors and their types. And knowing what is required to protest it. And to highlight the strength of its authority in the Saudi system and Islamic jurisprudence. Research Methodology: I adopted the pairing approach between the original and comparative approaches, by extrapolating the largest possible number of research sources and their advanced and late references. And the obligation to present issues in the Saudi system, then in Islamic jurisprudence, and then compare them. When dealing with controversial issues, the subject of dispute is edited, then the sayings are presented in proportion to their utterers according to the chronological order of the four schools of thought with their evidence, then the weighting and its reason. The most prominent results: The Saudi system is very much in agreement with what is stated in Islamic jurisprudence. Moreover, the editors are a systematic term that corresponds to the papers written in Islamic jurisprudence. The Saudi system of ordinary papers that are not prepared for proof and whose authenticity is confirmed are proven authentic before the competent authorities with conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The main objective is to clarify the reasons for the absence of an airtight and rigorous definition acceptable in the academic field. Methods: This paper investigates the historical context of the emergence of the term and analytically compares the various attempts to control the concept. Furthermore, it compares the experiences of peoples and nations in this regard, to reach a broader understanding and more rigorous control of the concept. Results: the main results of this paper is that the concept of modernity is still in need of scrutiny. This is justified on the epistemological level by the development of novel research methods and by the discrepancies in approaching the issue from different areas of specialization. On the cultural level, it is justified by the differences between peoples and the specificities of their experience. It is here that the originality of this paper is located, its aim is not to control the concept, but to highlight that it is to remain open to multiple possibilities, away from the argument of the end of history. Conclusions: this study examines the concept of modernity and tracks the relevant attempts in this field, giving the fact that it is an ambiguous concept that generated many debate to the point of contradiction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]