Search

In My research paper I explain the relationship between Logic and Language in Al-Allamah al-Ḥillī's believes, so the research divided as follow: First of all, the Introduction of the research, that it focuses on the important of the Subject and reason of choosing the subject and the details of the research. The first topic of the research, explain the definition of the Logic in language and Meaning from the different points of Logicians. The second topic of research, it focuses on the emergence of the Logic, and the results show that the Logic is found before Aristotle. In the third topic of research it focuses on the definition of the linguistics in the language and meaning. The fourth topic deals with some of the essential ideologies that mentioned about the essential the language. The fifth topic it concerns to the function of the language. The sixth topic it concerns on the relationship between Logic and language, the differences and the power of concern between them. At the end the research concerns with the results that the researcher found them in his investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In My research paper I explain the relationship between Logic and Language in Al-Allamah al-Ḥillī's believes, so the research divided as follow: First of all, the Introduction of the research, that it focuses on the important of the Subject and reason of choosing the subject and the details of the research. The first topic of the research, explain the definition of the Logic in language and Meaning from the different points of Logicians. The second topic of research, it focuses on the emergence of the Logic, and the results show that the Logic is found before Aristotle. In the third topic of research it focuses on the definition of the linguistics in the language and meaning. The fourth topic deals with some of the essential ideologies that mentioned about the essential the language. The fifth topic it concerns to the function of the language. The sixth topic it concerns on the relationship between Logic and language, the differences and the power of concern between them. At the end the research concerns with the results that the researcher found them in his investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heidegger’s critique of Aristoteles’ definition of mankind as ζώον λόγον έχον is a long and still attractive chapter in his philosophy. We see often in Heidegger’s works that he appeals to the Latin translation (or the Latin interpretation, as he says) of animal rationale as a way to criticize western metaphysics. The conception of mankind in western metaphysics, culture, and thought is based on the Aristotelian definition. This paper aims to discuss the role and importance of this definition in Heidegger's thought. Broadly speaking, he has two kinds of discussion about it: there is a question concerning human beings, but in so far as it is the Being-question; and there is a question concerning language. Here we restrict ourselves to the latter. Firstly, in the introduction part, we will justify posing a question about the human being and will show that such a question is a kind of Being-question. After that, in the first part, based on Heidegger’s lecture The Ground Problems of Metaphysics (1929/30) we will explore those language-problems which are arisen from the Aristotelian definition. Heidegger's starting point is λόγος, i.e. speech or language, which is taken from ζώον λόγον έχον. Finally, in the second part, we will explore the same problem in Heidegger’s Being and Time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]