Search

The issue of al-jam’ wa al-tafrīq [combining and differentiating] first became apparent early on, with the very beginning of the genre of rijāl al-hadith, being the study of hadith narrators. Within chains of hadith narrations, one finds many narrators who share the same name. More specifically, two narrators may have the same first name and father’s name, first name and family name, first name and kunya [honorific], or the like. This problem appeared so frequently that scholars who’ve tackled it over the years first dedicated specific terminology to this, al-muttafiq wa al-muftariq [the alike and the unalike], and then built a whole sub-genre dedicated to this under the broader field of hadith studies. Just as this issue appears in all books dedicated to the study of hadith narrators, it also is a frequent question in books more narrowly focused on the biographies of the Sahaba, the companions of the Prophet Muhammad. This study aims to give careful consideration to this issue of al-jam’ wa al-tafrīq in books dedicated to the Sahaba specifically. It uncovers the perceptiveness of the authors of this genre and the particular attention they paid to solving this matter, both in theory and in practice. This study further aims to identify their tendencies toward either narrowing or expanding, such as whether they tended to consider narrators with shared names as a single individual or as separate individuals, and to evaluate the efficacy of their approaches toward resolving this issue. The article begins with Ibn Manda and Abu Nu’aym, moves on to Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, and ends with Ibn al-Athīr and Ibn Hajar. Beyond tracing the history of this issue and its development through books dedicated to the Sahaba, this paper will identify the various ways these authors addressed companions with shared names and will evaluate the effectiveness of their perspectives. The article then ends by offering critical suggestions to refine the methodology currently used when approaching this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Hadith Collection is the best form of the sayings of Holy Prophet SAW. Among this collection, Sunan by Imam AbuDawood is the key figure to explicit the sayings of the Prophet in Fiqhi Manner. The traditions in Sunan Abu Dawood are divided in three categories. The first category consists of those of the traditions that are mentioned by Bukhari and/or Muslim. Imam Abu Dawood compiled this book with a great struggle to search and edit the hadith in it. This book has been edited on Fiqhi sequence. To compile the book, Imam Abu Dawood exerted his major part of life. He categorized various Tabaqat on the basis of JarahoTadeel. He also used contemplated words in his collection. While narrating hadith, he also elaborated the difference during channel of transmitters, continued the sequence of abrogating hadith prior to abrogated ones, elucidated fiqhi quotes and deduced benefits from these very sayings, If there is the individual or major difference of opinion he also tried to furnish it with examples. He got the hadith(s) from the great scholars of his era like Imam Ahmed, Imam Shafee, Imam Bukhari, Ali bin Madeeni etc. He narrated the hadith(s) from his teachers and senior ones and conveyed to his disciples. This very method is called "AKHZ-OTAHDEES". The present research paper will highlight various principles of hadith with unique quoted examples, Imam Abu Dawood has formulated for hadith compilation. His methodology of compiling hadith (s), narrators, text and transmitters have been explored in the paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Department of Fundamentals of Jurisprudence - College of Sharia and Fundamentals of Religion - King Khalid University All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the Alamin, and peace and blessings be upon the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, having said all that:This research is entitled " Fundamentalist issues in Ayyats that is said " And complete the Hajj and 'umrah for Allah" Its importance comes from relation to the source of evidence and legislation, the origin of the assets is the book of God Almighty, and related to the science governing the understanding of texts, which is the science of jurisprudenceK. This paper consists of four sections. The first section includes fundamental issues in Sharia laws, in which four issues were discussed, including the obligatory statement of a commandment, and the voluntary statement of a commandment whenever it contains a clue. The second section elaborated on the issues of fundamentals related to the evidence of legislative rules, in which two issues were discussed: the Sunnah being overwritten by the Quran and the Quranic verses visa-vis the legislative canons of people of old. The third section covers a number of fundamental issues pertaining connotations that include the following discussions: if the commandment of completion connotes commencement, and vice versa; a number of fundamental connotations in the Quranic verse of the general common; the common and the specific; the connotations of associations and entailments; the conjunction “and” in a Quranic verse. The fourth section addresses the contradiction of some denotations of expressions, such as the contradiction between the real and the metaphoric; the metaphoric and specific; and using a Quranic verse to balance between the connotations of two apparently contradictory hadiths. In this research, I tried to devise the fundamental issues related to this part of the Ayyah. based on the words of fundamentalists, jurists and interpreters, and the most important results: The study of fundamentalist issues through the legal texts and highlighting the applied side in them an investigation of the existence of rules in the texts, and a statement of how to take rulings from them, and directing the science of the origins of jurisprudence from the realm of endoscopy to the realm of realization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper attempts to settle an old debate which has not yet been resolved, between rational scientific culture based on logic and an objective process that is relatively selfless on the one hand, and a faith-oriented religious culture on the other hand, and how both views impact historiography as a methodological science. Accordingly, history throughout the Islamic era has remained a fixed and traditional process, which adopts the approaches and methods of early predecessors and scholars in term of evaluating and critiquing narratives to verify the authenticity of prophetic hadiths, in the context of broader and more general contexts, which believed that history in itself is a product of a divine creation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research aims at studying Verbal Signifiers of some Prophetic words and expressions that were mentioned in the book al-adāb waatharuha fi al-tawjeeh al-akhlāqi, because the traditions (hadith) or have a good impact on the education and rehabilitating of selves, and correction of ethics. The good ethics are including choosing virtues and doing away with vices. Moreover, good ethics are of the traits of the prophets (May Allah send prayers and peace upon them) and saints(May Allah be pleased with them). This research paper is divided into two sections: section one concerning ordinary people-related expressions, which including taking care of parents, boosting relations with next of kin. The second section appertain to taking care of orphans, and helping the widows, the needy plus clarifying the duties towards neighbours. This research paper comes to the conclusion that righteous ethics are essential for survival of nations, and ethical degradation leads to fast-disappearing of nations. So, Muslims should adhere to the prophet's instructions which were mentioned in hadith in order to promote the nation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research aims to shed light on a hidden aspect of the personality of Imam Ibn Al-Qattan, after becoming famous in the field of Hadith sciences. The aspect that I want to show in this paper is the aspect of Usul, as the research revealed Ibn al-Qattan's good knowledge of Usul al-Fiqh. The historians mentioned that he has many books in this science, perhaps the most important of which is the book: "Masayil Min 'Usul Alfiqh Lam Yadhkurha Al'usuliuwn Fi Kutubihim". This indicates that Ibn al-Qattan was not only concerned with what the scholars of Usul al-Fiqh said, but he was one of the renovators in this science. Among what we explained in this research: what is related to the total evidence considered by him in the construction of rulings, which are the Qur'an, the Sunnah, consensus, measurement, accompaniment, reclamation, and the principle of precaution... It was also clear that he did not see the authenticity of some evidence as Shariah from us, and blocking the pretext in opposition to text and more. This research has mentioned some of Ibn al-Qattan's choices in the Fundamentals of jurisprudence sub issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imām Abu Bakr Al-Bazzār – may Allah have mercy on him - developed his Musnad in which he differentiated between rightful and misleading narrations (Ḥadīth). Upon distinguishing between the rightful and the problematic narrations, he stressed on the importance of authenticity of narrators, communicators and senders. His major contributions heavily emphasized on the singularity of the narrator transmitting the Ḥadīth. In this paper, the purpose is to examine those narrations and reconnoiter the singularity of narrator mentioned as to whether it is rightful or misleading, hence being problematic. Particularly, this paper critically investigates the chain of narrators in Musnad Imām Al-Bazzār who categorized the singularity of narrators as problematic due to the narrators being unknown or infamous. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study sheds a light on one of the common issues between hadith (narration) and jurisprudence (fiqh) sciences, which is the method used by scholars to prevent the conflict between the textual evidence (religious texts). The books of jurisprudence principles (Usul al-fiqh) and narration principles (Usul al-hadith) mention the existence of two approaches of scholars regarding this issue: Muhaddith's (narrator's) and majority of principalist's (Usuli's) approach and Hanafi's approach, and both can be traced back to their origins in the school of people of Ra'y (school of opinionists) and the school of people of hadith (school of narrationists). This paper assumes that the common method known to be used by Hanafis to resolve the conflict between texts by Naskh (Abrogation), Tarjih (Preponderance) and then Jam' (Combining) is not the correct method expressed by the scholars of this school or the school of Ahl Alra'y (opinionists) since it is a dubious order controversing the principles of that school and the texts of the school founders. It also assumes that the correct order cannot be known without studying their school's origins and order of evidence. Al-'Awnī addressed this issue as well, and he claimed that the Hanafis' approach is consistent with the approach of Muhaddithin (narrationists) upon discrepancies where they do the opposite by starting with Jam' (Combining), then Tarjih (Preponderance) if they could not resolve it, and finally Naskh (Abrogation) comes if any of the previous two approaches could not resolve these discrepancies. This study aims to critically analyse the study paper of al-'Awnī' and explain (the agreements and the disagreements between the two studies), before presenting a method that fits the statements of the Hanafī scholars in resolving the discrepancies between texts. The study agrees with what al-'Awnī' has stated aboutthe delaying the Naskh (Abrogation), but it disagrees with its statement that the Tarjih (Preponderance) succeed the Jam' (Combining) by Hanafis. Therefore, the proposed order is Tarjih (Preponderance), Jam' (Combining), and then Naskh (Abrogation), and this study explains the appropriate evidence to support this claim. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper tends to shed light on the effects of globalization on translation for its pretty relationship with thinking and interpretation processes. Hence; some linguistic phenomena do not accept the pretty known procedure of translation; like religious texts such as Holy Hadith that still recognizes some problems related to its exact and correct translation, based on its explanation and interpretation depending on its context. Hereafter, this paper investigates the difference between explanation and interpretation of Holy Hadith, the way context affects on its understanding, and the correct translation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper aims to study Ahadis that Al-Imam Al-Daraqutni has mentioned in his book " Al-Afraad wa Al-Gharaaib" as At-tafarrud whereas they are defective due to its persistence in later periods. Hidden defects of the Hadith is one of the highly esteemed knowledge that few scholars had studied, of them, is Al-Imam Al-Daraqutni. It has a prominent role in the preservation of the Sunnah of Muhammad (peace be upon him), as mistakes of some narrators were hidden and considered authentic mistakenly. Al-Daraqutni wrote the book "Al-Afraad wa Al-Gharaib", and compiled Ahadith of individuals and oddities. He explained strangeness and the subject of exclusivity or conflict. It is a major source for (acknowledgment of) hidden defects of hadith. The research is done practically and critically by collecting the defected ahadith and studying it according to the methodology of scholars. It consists of an Introduction to Al-Daraqutni and his book, At-tafarrud its divisions and ruling. The first section explains taffaurd i.e. rejected by scholars due to its persistence in later periods and its regulations. The second section proves the practical implementation of these ahadith through examples from the book. In conclusion, important results from research are mentioned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In every period, hadith experts have contributed to the preservation of the Hadith. Imam Malik composed M’ūaṭa to safeguard the hadith, and Imam al-Bukhari afterwards turned to al-Mu'tah for assistance. The research methodology of this paper is an analytical study of the reliance of Imām Bukhārī on Al-M’ūaṭa Imam Mālik in Ṣaḥiḥ Bukhārī. In our article, we came to the conclusion that Imam Bukhari recounted a total of six hundred sixty-eight narrations from Imam Malik in his Sahih, of which six hundred four are scriptural narrations that he took from ten versions of Al- M’ūaṭa. As a result, these narrations make up more than ninety percent of all narrations. Contrasted with in his Sahih, Imam Muslim narrates three hundred eighty-nine narrations from Imam Malik, three hundred twelve of which are scriptural narrations that he has derived from eight of narrations of al M’ūaṭa's. These narrations so account for more than eighty percent of all narrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper deals collect the research dedicated for the study of Hadith in the “Journal of Studies” (Sharia and law Sciences) published in the University of Jordan starting from issue (1) and up to issue(42) the current issue, followed by a study of the researchers’ trends in these papers, classifying them by: 1. Time period; considering the difference between papers and the change in writing style starting with the earliest issue until the current one 2. Subject matter; considering to what extent the papers have covered the subject matter 3. Researchers; and to what extent they were involved in the subject matter they discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Civilization is a social phenomenon which has been transferred from generation to generation and aims to clarify the truths, protect a certain society and aimes the civilized life style and the relationship dimension of society with human being. The Islamic conquests have been caused the expansion of the Islamic realm for the survitude the of Allah and to achieve peace in the world. For this supreme purpose islamic invitation started from Arabian peninsula to the four corners of the World. Language and culture have their effect on everywhere and no matter who they are. For this reason, by the emergence and conquests of Islam, Arabic language has effected other languages as well as Persian language. Similarly, we witness that Arabic language has also been effected by the Persian language. We can never forget that the Arabic language is a means to understand the aims of Islam religion. Since Arabic is Quran language and it is the manifestation of faith and piety, people has always taken care and made claim to Arabic language. The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the influence of the Arabic language on the Persian language and vice versa. It also sheds light on the depth of the ages of social and cultural relationship and the relationship between the owners of both Persian and Arabic languages throughout the history of Islam. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ilm Fiqh-ul-Hadith is one of the important disciplines of the Hadith studies. It tells us how to interpret a hadith and how a legal ruling can be derived from the sources of Hadith. It also determines how to inference a verdict from the Hadith texts. Orders and obligatory issues of the religion depend on it. The present article studies Lami al-durari, a multi-voluminous commentary on Sahih Bukhari, penned by an Indian scholar Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi. The present paper is an attempt to evaluate the Lami al-Darari from the prospective of Fiqh al- Hadith. A number of new interpretations have been identified which were not even mentioned by the predecessors in their books. We also attempted to see its impact on the subsequent literature in the field. Through a comparative study of other leading commentaries of Sahih al-Bukhari, it endeavors to ascertain its intellectual place in the discipline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is concerned with prophetic hadith that is rooting a famous acoustic phenomenon, slanting particularly in styles of recitation and generally in classical Arabic . The study was divided into three aspects . Firstly it extrapolated the narratives of hadith in its resources, extracted the authentic text, showed its narrators, proved its authenticity, designated the linguistic significance showed the opinions towards its authenticity . Secondly it showed the phonetic significance of the slanting phenomenon in the hadith according to the languages of Arabs . Thirdly it confirmed the relationship between the slanting talk and the talk of revelation of Koran seven characters . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper aims to study the contribution of Abd Allah b. al-Mubārak in Islamic jurisprudence- a relatively less acknowledged field of his works. Ibn Mubarak had been known for his piety and knowledge of hadith studies. He had been recorded in the Sufi chronicles as one of the most virtuous scholars of Islam. Similarly, he was been counted in the highly category of hadith scholars and he earned the title of Amir al-Mu'minin fi al-Hadith. Malik b. Anas, Abū Hanīfa and Sufyān al-Thawrī were amongst the most important teachers of Abd Allāh b. al-Mubārak. Though Ibn al-Mubārak is well known for his contribution in the field of hadith but his contribution in Islamic Fiqh shows that he was also an expert of Islamic law. He possessed all the important qualities needed by a Mujtahid. The sources from which he derived Islamic law and his legal opinions are: the Holy Qur'an, hadith, consensus (ijma), analogical reasoning (qiyas), juristic discretion (istihsan) and the customs of the local population (urf). On the basis of his works in Islamic jurisprudence, the present study is an endeavor to establish his position as Mujtahid (on of highest category of fiqh scholars) through presenting his juridical opinions on various legal issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imam Abu Hanifa is among those great scholars who became extraordinary popular as a jurist. He despite of his skills as an expert of hadith was not properly recognized by some of traditionists. There is no doubt that Jurisprudence without knowledge of hadith is not possible. The popularity of Imam Abu Hanifa as a Jurist is around the globe, yet his expertise in hadith has not been adequately explored. This research paper explores the Imam Abu Hanifa's scholarship in the field of hadith. It revolves around such questions as how skillful he was in the knowledge of hadith and what was opinion of other experts of hadith about his expertise in this particular field of religious knowledge. It is argued here that the stature of Imam Abu Hanifa as an expert of hadtih was also wellestablished and on the basis of his authority in hadith, he contributed in the field of Islamic Jurisprudence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This scientific research deals with Imām Abū Hanīfah al-Nu‘mān not in his field, which he excelled in, but in another field that he is accused of, which is the hadīth of the Prophet. Many concerned the study of many aspects of the jurisprudence of Imām Abū Hanīfa, but it is unfair in the comprehensiveness of his studies in the side is a source of any fundamental jurisprudent is the Hadīth side. This paper shows the compatibility of the methodology of Imām Abū Hanīfa with the legal origins of this great religion. The researcher has proved through the deeds and sayings positions of him and the great critics of the great rapprochement or the full commitment of Abū Hanīfa with the Hadīth Scholars, either in carrying the modern novel or in its performance. And highlighted the character of Abū Hanīfa scientific perform which exceed thejurisprudence limits in the Hadīth area, and this is impossible for many of those who criticized Abū Hanīfa without a deep vision and scientific exploration of his curriculum and vision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper could be considered a template or an example of how to deal with some of the critiqued hadīths in al-Sahīhayn (Muslim and Bukhārī). It also exemplifies a scientific method in studying these hadīths with an objectivity that avoids the bias of both sanctification and desecration. It also serves as an example of how to answer those who -in these times where Sahīh-dispute has taken a loud and very unscientific path - try to attack the principles and pillars of this religion. The researcher has chosen a hadīth that has been often criticized and even mocked. Sometimes on the hands of the biased who hold ill intentions close to heart, and other times by those who simply lack enough knowledge and expertise. The teacher refutes the arguments that both parties have come to provide and gives an evidenced approach to the study in order to get to the result that confusing the sound Hadiths with the unfit ones has often been die to failing to observe the methodology of the writers of the al- Sahīhayn. And from God I seek guidance and precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]