Search

This paper aims to study the Zionist narrative and the changes that have occurred over time ever since the emergence of the Zionist movement. The study starts with a theoretical section on comparative colonial settlement models, definitions of the novel, and its changes between the Zionist novel and others. In the second section, the study discusses the main components of the Zionist narrative, as classified by Bar-On, which are: gathering exiles in the Land of Israel, creating a regional space for Jews there, creating a contemporary reality for the Jewish community, achieving political sovereignty, and finaly the achievement of peace and international acceptance. The paper analyzes the intersections and differences in the novel between political Zionism, labor Zionism, revisionist Zionism (Iron Wall Zionism), and religious Zionism, and across time. The study ends with a summary of its findings, wondering about the possibility of the Zionist narrative continuation in light of the cracks it is exposed to, both internally and externally. The study is heavily based on Zionist references, and Jewish ones in particular, in order to deconstruct the narrative from within. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper adopts a historical sociological approach that closely links analysis to common trends in development or the application of sociology to problems by describing history as a field of inquiry and reflection, focusing on what calls for comparison. Addressing such a topic requires a paleontological analysis to determine the geostrategic background of the alliance between imperialism and Zionism: “To think well on political and social fields, one must read well into the historical field.” This study adopts a forceful high-pitched tone, that showcases aggression instead of war, especially since war is related to the use of force between two or more countries, according to Karl Clausewitz, while what Gaza is witnessing is an aggression of a military state against a liberation movement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper details the unforeseen changes that are occurring within the Zionist entity, which are expressed by the nature of the new government coalition due to the inconclusive success that it achieved in the 2022 elections: the first change is the loss of the right-wing that calls for bestowing the Israeli citizenship upon the Palestinian nationals and subjecting them to the apartheid regime, in the interest of other right-wing victory that calls for the killing, extermination, and deportation of Palestinians. The second change is the blatant return to the racist tendencies that characterized Zionism entity since its inauguration through adopting further practices that showcase its Nazism against the Palestinians, including the acceleration of religioning the state and the creation of a fascist regime opposed to the judiciary, women's rights, media, secular education and the left. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper studied the Iraqi attitudes towards Camp David Accords in 1978. This Accord Considers One of the worst agreements that Signed by Egypt and the Zionist in 1978. keeping in mind that Egypt had many wars with Zionists. Egypt was the first Arabian country which faced the Zionist attacks on the Palastinies People Since 1948. The president Jamal Abdul Nasar is the most Nationalist Arabian leader who Stood against the Israeli plans. Iraq ، also ، Considers One of the first Arabian Countries which Supported Egypt in its Policies against the Zionists. The Iraqi - Egyptian relations were very distinguished and featured as very Co-operated until disaster of Egypt when it Signed the Comb David Accords which attacked the Iraqi policy towards Egypt and this accords Contributed in bad relations between Iraq and Egypt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The decision by the British House of Commons taken on 13th October 2014, recognizing the establishment of a Palestinian state is an important development. Observers saw this move is of utmost importance because of the geopolitical dimension of Britain for it is a major ally of Israel and is considered as the founder and thereby an effective sponsor of the Zionist movement and Israel. Britain has done more to supporting the Jewish people than any other friendly country in the first half of the last 20th century. So when Britain through its parliament makes this decision as it was the initiator of the Balfour Declaration, it carries much weight and implications. Britain made this decision despite Zionist efforts to persuade them not to. Previously calls accusing Israel of sabotaging efforts to reach a political peace settlement in the Middle East were limited to trade unions and popular movements. Now the calls are made by politicians in Britain's highest decision-making body. This study discusses the background behind this symbolic move, analyzes its details and implications, focusing on the statements of the 43 MP's who spoke on the decision to recognize a Palestinian state. These statements serve as a “historical document” thoroughly researched for this paper. The study analyzed what British MPs said and the debate that took place between those in favour a Palestinian state and those against. The paper adheres to a strict methodology and analytical content to examine the MP's stands through looking at what was said and classify them, reaching a “group of conclusions” that Israel is “obsessed” with security concerns, and it is losing its image on the popular and official level in Britain. British politicians are angry and dismayed at the stands of Israel and hence supported recognition. The study called for a constructive follow up on this positive development to push politicians to stop using double standards by exerting more pressure on Israel through imposing sanctions, and convince the same politicians of the Palestinian people’s right for determination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]