Search

This research comes to talk about one of the contemporary financial current controversial issues, which is the "forgotten cash transfer". The importance of this topic is to identify us for the juridical ruling of this current controversial issue. The research aimsto identify the meaning of the cash forgotten cash transfer and its causes, controls, provisions and its adaptation. The research depends on the Induction and descriptive analysis methodology and comparison. The research was divided into three sections. The first section dealt with the definition of the legal transfer and its juridical rules, while the second section dealt with the cash transfer, its types and its adaptation, and the third section dealt with the forgotten cash transfer, its causes, controls, provisions and its adaptation. The research concluded by mentioning the most important results and recommendations, including: that the forgotten cash transfer is treated as money that could not be returned to its owner, because the suspicion of it appeared when it was measured against it, and because of the acquit of those who settled with the money and could not find its owner by giving charity on his behalf; Because it is not permissible to own money and benefit from it, and because the owner of the money benefits from the reward of giving charity on it; It is not gathering for him to lose his money and the disposition of others with it, without benefit due to him. The researcher recommended the students of Islamic Sciences to pay attention to current controversial issues, and to explain the juridical ruling, for example: digital (electronic) currencies, the juridical ruling on their exchange and transfer, and so on. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of The Iraqi University is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Historical & Cultural Studies an Academic Magazine is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This study deals with a rule of intentionality related to the jurisprudence of budgets. This rule is concerned with showing the weighing between equal and conflicting interests that could not be reconciled, so that some of them can then be sacrificed to preserve the others and gain them. In accordance, applying it to the branches of jurisprudence and the question of the right to treatment when crowding. The researcher divided the research into three sections. The first is a statement of what is meant by conflicting equal interests. The extent to which it is permissible to equal conflicting interests. The second is a statement of how to weigh between conflicting interests and their applications in the branches of jurisprudence. The third is a statement of the impact of the rule on the issue of the right to treatment when competing, according to the descriptive-analytical method. The researcher concluded that if the weighing process was not possible based on objective criteria such as the type of interest, impact, or rank, then weighing by choice or lot, or stopping according to the most appropriate would be resorted. It was impossible to consider the normative and objective descriptions related to the same disease, namely the hope of acquittal and its severity. It is prescribed to resort to procedural descriptions, which is the priority of access to the hospital and the way of drawing lots. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Dirasat Tarbawiya is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Zarqa Journal for Research & Studies in Humanities is the property of Zarqa Journal for Research & Studies in Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)