Search

Copyright of Theoria Journal for Philosophy / Theoria Casopis za Filozofiju is the property of Theoria Journal for Philosophy / Theoria Casopis za Filozofiju and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Legal Records / Pravni Zapisi is the property of Union University Law School, Belgrade and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Yearbook of the Faculty of Political Sciences / Godisnjak Fakultet Politickih Nauka Beograd is the property of University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper analyzes the theory of Islam as a religion that could have formed a rationalistic civilization, based on scientific progress, individualism and democracy. One of the representative studies on this topic is the work of Mustafa Akyol Reopening of Muslim Minds, in which the author uses the method of counterfactual analysis, posing the fundamental question: what would Islamic civilization look like if in the Sunni majority had not prevailed Ash’ari theology, but rationalistic, Mu’tazili theology? Although it could be said that the author of this study does not err when he concludes that Ash’ari occasionalism stopped the development of science in Islam, he nevertheless errs when he claims that the doctrines of voluntarism, predestination, and uncreatedness of the Qur’an, were generators of injustice in Islamic society. In this paper we tried to analyze the metaphysical foundations of these doctrines, re-examine the validity of the hypothesis about their harmfulness, and re-examine whether the observed harmful effects come from Islamic tradition or from the more recent attempts of modernization of Islam.

Copyright of Ekonomske Ideje i Praksa is the property of Centar za Izdavacku Delatnost Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Beogradu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Pregled is the property of University of Sarajevo and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology is the property of Issues in Ethnology Anthropology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ekonomske Ideje i Praksa is the property of Centar za Izdavacku Delatnost Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Beogradu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

When we talk about the European idea, Europe as a geographical or cultural space, or especially about the European Union, we can often hear about the Founding Fathers of EU and the famous trio of Robert Schuman, Konrad Adenauer and Alcide De Gasperi, and eventually Jean Monnet with them. This is historically grounded and certainly justified. But very rarely we can hear about the great French philosopher Jacques Maritain and about his influence on the European project and Euro-Atlantic integration. This should not be seen as an injustice, but only as a curiosity. This paper, in which the author brings and expands some excerpts from his doctoral dissertation, seeks to shed some light on Maritain's role in this context, i.e. to try to look at the future of Europe in the light of his philosophy, and especially in the context of the issue of the relationship between politics and religion. In one sentence - over the past century, Maritain has played perhaps the most important role in shaping the idea of European and world unity, and despite everything that discourages us today, the future of Europe and then the whole world in the light of Maritain's philosophy is not dark and there is room for everyone in it. Is it possible and wise to think about the future of European unity without thinking about the world unity? If the unification of Europe is a good thing, is the unification of the world even better? Is the anthropological question the crucial one? How important is religion in the context of Europe and its future? What about secularity and secularism? What is the future of religion? Are Europe and EU (exclusively) Christian continent and project? Is democracy conceivable without Christianity? To what extent is religion/faith personal and private, and to what extent is it a public matter? What about the controversial relationship between religion and politics? Finally, what does all this mean for interreligious dialogue within the EU - especially between Jews, Christians and Muslims? – these are some of the issues that the author deals with in his work or just points to. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]