1. Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia
- Author
-
Konstantinos N. Syrigos, Zee Wan Wong, Antonio Salar, Mahmoud Abdelsalam, Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha, Gilles Freyer, Zsolt Szabo, Lucy DeCosta, Giuseppe Tonini, Guenther G. Steger, Say Liang Ng, and Mihai Marinca
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Risk Assessment ,Risk Factors ,Neoplasms ,Physicians ,Internal medicine ,Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ,Quimioteràpia ,medicine ,Humans ,Intensive care medicine ,Aged ,Febrile Neutropenia ,Chemotherapy ,Neutropènia ,Hematology ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ,Oncology ,Female ,Observational study ,Guideline Adherence ,Risk assessment ,business ,Complication ,Febrile neutropenia - Abstract
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721. Funding for this support was provided by Amgen (Europe) GmbH.
- Published
- 2015