1. [Long-term efficacy of a second generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCEL2) in treating patients with de novo coronary artery diseases].
- Author
-
Wang G, Bian LY, Li Y, Jing QM, Wang XZ, Liu HW, Wang B, Xu K, and Han YL
- Subjects
- Absorbable Implants, Humans, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Polymers, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Cardiovascular Agents administration & dosage, Coronary Artery Disease therapy, Drug-Eluting Stents, Sirolimus administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of a second generation biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (EXCEL2) in treating patients with de novo coronary artery diseases. Methods: CREDIT Ⅱ trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study, conducted at 15 Chinese cardiac centres from November 2013 to December 2014. In this analysis, eligible patients for coronary stenting ( n= 419) were randomized to receive either the EXCEL2 stent ( n= 208) or the EXCEL stent ( n= 211). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years after PCI defined as a composite endpoints of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). Secondary endpoints included patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) including all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularization at 3 years and independent components, and stent thrombosis according to Academic Research Consortium's (ARC) definition. Results: Among 419 enrolled patients, 413 (98.6%) patients completed 3-year clinical follow-up. Compared with the EXCEL group, 3-year TLF (5.4%(11/204) vs. 11.5% (24/209), P= 0.025) and PoCE (9.8% (20/204) vs. 20.1% (42/209), P= 0.003) were significantly lower in the EXCEL2 group. The cumulative event rate of CI-TLR (2.0% (4/204) vs. 5.7% (12/209), P= 0.042) and any revascularization (4.9% (10/204) vs. 14.4% (30/209), P= 0.001) were statistically lower in the EXCEL2 group than in the EXCEL group. There were no significant difference between two groups in terms of all-cause death and all MI. Rates of stent thrombosis were low without significant difference between the two groups (EXCEL2 vs. EXCEL, 1.0% (2/204) vs. 2.9% (6/209), P= 0.285). Conclusion: 3-year clinical follow-up results demonstrate that EXCEL2 stents are effective and safe in treating CAD patients with de novo coronary lesions.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF