Search

Your search keyword '"David Moher"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "David Moher" Language chinese
2 results on '"David Moher"'

1. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. Translation into Russian

Author

Melissa S. Barber, Jeffrey K. Aronson, Tido von Schoen-Angerer, David S. Riley, Peter Tugwell, Helmut Kiene, M. Helfand, Douglas G. Altman, H. Sox, Paul G. Werthmann, David Moher, Richard A. Rison, Larissa Shamseer, Christian A. Koch, Gordon Sun, Patrick Hanaway, Nancy L. Sudak, James E. Carpenter, and Joel J. Gagnier

Subjects
case report, case study, equator network, health research reporting guidelines, care guideline, timelines, n-of-1, Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics, R858-859.7
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-written and transparent case reports (1) reveal early signals of potential benefits, harms, and information on the use of resources; (2) provide information for clinical research and clinical practice guidelines, and (3) inform medical education. High-quality case reports are more likely when authors follow reporting guidelines. During 20112012, a group of clinicians, researchers, and journal editors developed recommendations for the accurate reporting of information in case reports that resulted in the CARE (CAse REport) Statement and Checklist. They were presented at the 2013 International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, have been endorsed by multiple medical journals, and translated into nine languages. OBJECTIVES: This explanation and elaboration document has the objective to increase the use and dissemination of the CARE Checklist in writing and publishing case reports. ARTICLE DESIGN AND SETTING: Each item from the CARE Checklist is explained and accompanied by published examples. The explanations and examples in this document are designed to support the writing of high-quality case reports by authors and their critical appraisal by editors, peer reviewers, and readers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This article and the 2013 CARE Statement and Checklist, available from the CARE website [www.care-statement.org] and the EQUATOR Network [www.equator-network.org], are resources for improving the completeness and transparency of case reports. SOURCE: This article is a translation of the original paper CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026), prepared under the permission of the copyright holder (Elsevier Inc.), with supervision from the Scientific Editor by Professor E.G. Starostina, MD, PhD (translator) (Moscow, Russia).

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version)

Author

Diana Elbourne, Matthias Egger, David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Philip J. Devereaux, Peter C Gøtzsche, Sally Hopewell, Douglas G. Altman, and Victor M. Montori

Subjects
Medical education, Statement (logic), business.industry, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Checklist, law.invention, Critical appraisal, Empirical research, Systematic review, Complementary and alternative medicine, Randomized controlled trial, law, Medicine, business, Elaboration
Abstract

Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which are considered the gold standard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias. A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. It was first published in 1996 and updated in 2001. The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement. The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs. During the 2001 CONSORT revision, it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports. A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement. After an expert meeting in January 2007, the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement. This update improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias. This explanatory and elaboration document - intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the CONSORT statement - has also been extensively revised. It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and updated checklist item providing examples of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies. Several examples of flow diagrams are included. The CONSORT 2010 Statement, this revised explanatory and elaboration document, and the associated website (www.consort-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of randomised trials.

Published
2010

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results