Search

BACKGROUND In recent years, the study of rare polymetallic ore tends to be increasingly detailed. As one of the important research methods, electron probe quantitative analysis has made great progress in trace element measurement. During analysis, in addition to increasing the beam size and time to reduce the detection limit, more attention should be paid to removing the interference from other elements, especially the main elements. During the routine testing of rare polymetallic samples, Si, Ta, W interfere with each other. Such interference affects the analytical results of trace elements, and is not easily detected due to its low content, thus affecting the accuracy of the final conclusion. OBJECTIVES To determine the interference relationship among Si, Ta and W under different analytical conditions. METHODS Taking SiO2, metal Ta and W of SPI as the research object, each element was analyzed under different conditions by electron probe microanalyzer. RESULTS In the analysis of silicate, TAP-Kα is used for Si, and LIF-Lα is recommended for Ta and W. In the analysis of niobium tantalum ore, it is suggested to use PET-Kα, PET-Mα and TAP-Mβ for Si, Ta and W, respectively; since 100% Ta will produce about 0.1% Si, therefore, the results are more accurate with the interference correction of Ta on Si. CONCLUSIONS It is important to understand the spectral peak stripping method and the principle of element interference and spectral peak overlap, adjusting the parameters according to the actual situation to ensure the accuracy of data.

In order to investigate the influence of the deflector layout on the performance of mine-used main fan diffuser, the RNG k-ε turbulence model was applied to numerical simulation of the internal flow fields under three inlet velocity conditions with and without deflector. The influence of the central angle and starting angle of the deflector on the performance of the diffuser was investigated. The results show that for the diffuser without deflector, a serious flow accumulation phenomenon exists inside the flow field, which restricts the performance improvement of the diffuser; when the center angle of the deflector is small, the larger the starting angle of its installation is, the higher the diffusion efficiency of the diffuser under the three inlet velocities considered, however the secondary flow due to the uneven pressure on the upper and lower sides of the deflector head appears at some starting angles, which results in an increase in flow losses. As the center angle of the deflector increases, the flow accumulation inside the diffuser improves gradually, and the secondary flow also gradually weakens. When the center angle reaches 60°, the diffusion efficiency is the highest.