Search

Copyright of Kemija u Industriji is the property of Croatian Society of Chemical Engineers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper shows the trend of the world crude steel production in the first two decades of the 21st century. From 2000 to 2020, the world steelmaking continuously increased (total production of 28.5 billion t steel), but decreased in 2008 (1,6 %) and 2009 (7,7 %) because of the global financial and economic crises. For more than fifty years, the primary steelmaking processes are those by means of two technologies: oxidation of pig iron (product from blast furnace) in basic oxygen converters by means of technical oxygen, and smelting of old ferrous (steel scrap) in the electro arc furnaces. For the production of quality steel, the secondary metallurgy procedures (treatment of steel in ladle) play a greater role. In 2000, global steel production was 847.2 million t (basic oxygen converters share was 58.2 % and the electro arc furnaces 33.8 %), while in 2020, production reached 1.8775 billion t steel, which is an increase of 2.2 times. By 2020, the production of steel by steelmaking processes was 73.2 % by basic oxygen converters, 26.3 % by electro arc furnaces, 0.3 % by Siemens-Martin furnaces, and 0.2 % by other procedures of steel production. Primacy in steelmaking is in countries and companies from Asia (73.9 % of the world’s output). The recycling degree of steel in the period from 2011 to 2019 was 34–37 %. China is the largest world steelmaking country (since 1996). China had an increase in steelmaking of 8.3 times in the period from 2000 to 2020 (from 127.2 Mt up to 1.064 Gt). China produced 56.6 % of the world’s steel. From 2000 to 2020, a share of continuous casting was increased by about 10 % (from 87 to 96.6 %). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been extensively investigated because of their unique shape memory behaviour, i.e. their ability to recover their original shape they had before deformation. Shape memory effect is related to the thermoelastic martensitic transformation. Austenite to martensite phase transformation can be obtained by mechanical (loading) and thermal methods (heating and cooling). Depending on thermomechanical conditions, SMAs demonstrate several thermomechanical phenomena, such as pseudoelasticity, superelasticity, shape memory effect (one-way and two-way) and rubber-like behaviour. Numerous alloys show shape memory effect (NiTi-based alloys, Cu-based alloys, Fe-based alloys etc.). Nitinol (NiTi) is the most popular and the most commonly used SMA due to its superior thermomechanical and thermoelectrical properties. NiTi alloys have greater shape memory strain and excellent corrosion resistance compared to Cu -- based alloys. However, they are very costly. On the other hand, copper-based alloys (CuZn and CuAl based alloys) are much less expensive, easier to manufacture and have a wider range of potential transformation temperatures. The characteristic transformation temperatures of martensitic transformation of CuAlNi alloys can lie between -200 and 200 °C, and these temperatures depend on Al and Ni content. Among the Cu -- based SMAs, the most frequently applied are CuZnAl and CuAlNi alloys. Although CuZnAl alloys with better mechanical properties are the most popular among the Cu-based SMAs, they lack sufficient thermal stability, while CuAlNi shape memory alloys, in spite of their better thermal stability, have found only limited applications due to insufficient formability owing to the brittle γ2 precipitates. The most important disadvantage of polycrystalline CuAlNi alloys is a small reversible deformation (one-way shape memory effect: up to 4 %; two-way shape memory effect: only approximately 1.5 %) due to intergranular breakdown at low stress levels. The technologies for production of shape memory alloys are induction melting, vacuum melting, vacuum arc melting, following hot and cold working (forging, rolling, wire drawing). In addition, rapid solidification methods, like melt spinning and continuous casting have been developed. These methods are characterized by high cooling rates. High cooling rates allow very short time for diffusion processes and may lead to extremely fine microstructure, better homogeneity etc. SMAs have found applications in many areas due to their thermomechanical and thermoelectrical properties (biomedical applications, engineering industry, electrical industry). In this paper, a review of shape memory alloys, properties and applications of mentioned materials is presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) belong to a group of functional materials with the unique property of "remembering" the shape they had before pseudoplastic deformation. Such an effect is based on crystallographic reversible thermo-elastic martensitic transformation. There are two crystal phases in SMAs: the austenite phase (stable at high temperature) and the martensite phase (stable at low temperature). Austenite to martensite phase transformation can be obtained by mechanical (loading) and thermal methods (heating and cooling). During martensitic transformation, no diffusive process is involved, only inelastic deformation of the crystal structure. When the shape memory alloy passes through the phase transformation, the alloy transforms from high ordered phase (austenite) to low ordered phase (martensite). There are two types of martensite transformations. First is temperature-induced martensite, which is also called self-accommodating (twinned) martensite. The second is stress-induced martensite, also called detwinned martensite. The entire austenite to martensite transformation cycle can be described with four characteristic temperatures: Ms -- martensite start temperature, Mf -- martensite finish temperature, As -- austenite start temperature, and Af -- austenite finish temperature. The main factors influencing transformation temperatures are chemical composition, heat treatment procedure, cooling speed, grain size, and number of transformation cycles. As a result of martensitic transformation in SMAs, several thermomechanical phenomena may occur: pseudoelasticity, shape memory effect (one-way and two-way SME) and rubber-like behavior. Pseudoelasticity occurs when the SMA is subjected to a mechanical loading at a constant temperature above Af. The second thermomechanical behaviour that can be observed in SMA is the shape memory effect (SME), mainly one-way SME, which is the most commonly used SME. When the sample is subjected to a mechanical loading, the stress reaches a critical value and the transformation of twinned martensite into detwinned martensite begins and finishes when the loading process is finished. When the loading-unloading process is finished, the SMA presents a residual strain recoverable by alloy heating, which induces the reverse phase transformation. As a result, the alloy recovers to its original shape. In this paper, a review of thermomechanical properties of shape memory alloys and general characteristics of martensite transformations is shown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]