Search

Pojavom virusa COVID-19 krajem 2019. godine, cijeli se svijet okrenuo za 180° stupnjeva. Naši su životi, inače vrlo ubrzanog i dinamičnog karaktera, postali pasivni. Rapidno širenje dotad nepoznatog i nepredvidljivog virusa je uzelo danak u svim životnim aspektima pojedinca; počevši od onih zdravstvenih pa do društvenih i psiholoških. U vrtlogu zbunjenosti i bespomoćnosti, najveći se udio pažnje pridavao otkrivanju te prevenciji zdravstvenih problema dok su se posljedice na preostalim područjima čovjekova života zanemarivale. Osim odnosa prema drugima, meta promjena uzrokovanim novonastalom situacijom bili su i odnosi koje imamo prema sebi. Imajući u vidu navedeno, ovaj se završni rad bavio promjenama u kontekstu odnosa prema tijelu i tjelesnom izgledu. Istraživanje je provedeno online upitnikom na uzorku od 386 mladih muškaraca i žena iz Splita u dobi od 20 do 34 godine. Podaci su se prikupljali od kraja svibnja do početkom srpnja 2022. godine. Online upitnik u Google forms obliku je bio postavljen na nekoliko društvenih mreža. Za istraživanje su obuhvaćeni koncepti tjelesnog izgleda te pandemije. Cilj je bio ispitati percepcije mladih u Splitu o tjelesnom izgledu za vrijeme pandemije. Statistička je analiza podataka pokazala kako su sudionici u najvećem udjelu donekle zadovoljni svojim izgledom te smatraju da nemaju idealan tjelesni izgled. Pokazala se statistički značajna razlika između muškaraca i žena kod zadovoljstva tjelesnim izgledom. Pandemijske su mjere utjecale na odvijanje svakodnevnog života mladih Splićana i Splićanki, a tjelesni im je izgled tijekom pandemije bio podjednako važan kao i prije. U kontekstu održavanja tjelesnog izgleda, sudionici su reducirali odlaske u frizerske i kozmetičke salone. Naposljetku, nije dokazano da su žene tijekom pandemije više posvećivale pažnju tjelesnom izgledu od muškaraca., With the appearance of the COVID-19 virus at the end of 2019, the whole world turned 180°. Our lives, normally very fast-paced and dynamic, have become passive. The rapid spread of a previously unknown and unpredictable virus took its toll in all aspects of an individual's life; starting from health ones to social and psychological ones. In the vortex of confusion and helplessness, the greatest share of attention was given to the detection and prevention of health problems, while the consequences on the remaining areas of a person's life were neglected. In addition to relationships with others, the target of changes caused by the newly created situation were also the relationships we have with ourselves. Bearing in mind the above, this final paper dealt with changes in the context of attitudes towards the body and physical appearance. The research was conducted using an online questionnaire on a sample of 386 young men and women from Split aged 20 to 34. The data was collected from the end of May to the beginning of July 2022. An online questionnaire in the form of Google forms was posted on several social networks. Concepts of physical appearance and the pandemic are included in the research. The goal was to examine the perceptions of young people in Split about physical appearance during the pandemic. The statistical analysis of the data showed that the majority of participants are somewhat satisfied with their appearance and consider that they do not have an ideal physical appearance. A statistically significant difference between men and women in satisfaction with physical appearance was shown. Pandemic measures affected the everyday life of young men and women from Split, and their physical appearance during the pandemic was just as important as before. In the context of maintaining their physical appearance, the participants reduced visits to hairdressing and beauty salons. After all, it has not been proven that women paid more attention to physical appearance than men during the pandemic.

Svjetska zdravstvena organizacija je 11. ožujka 2020. godine proglasila globalnu pandemiju COVID-19. U cilju smanjenja incidencije i broja žrtava, mnogo država je proglasilo mjere socijalne izolacije kao prvu liniju prevencije širenja zaraze. Novonastale promjene u svakodnevici su neupitno utjecale na prehrambene navike i stil života. U svrhu prikupljanja informacija o prehrambenim navikama formuliran je anketni upitnik sastavljen od 78 pitanja (sociodemograski podaci, stil života i prehrambeno ponašanje). U istraživanju je sudjelovalo 100 studenata. Analize pokazuju kako su osobe u prosjeku provodile više vremena pred ekranom te imali lošiju kvalitetu sna što odgovara otprije poznatim trendovima. Rezultati su pokazali povećanje konzumacije voća i povrća te smanjenje konzumacije alkohola. Značajan broj ispitanika je povećao broj dnevno konzumiranih obroka te je utvrđen viši postotak konzumacije samostalno pripremljenih obroka. Opravdano je zaključiti kako je ciljana populacija ispitanika usvojila konvencionalno zdravije prehrambene navike tijekom boravka u izolaciji. The World Health Organisation declared the global pandemic COVID-19 on 11th of March 2020. In order to reduce the incidence and number of victims, many countries have declared social isolation measures as the first line of prevention of the spread of the infection. The new changes in everyday life have unquestionably affected eating habits and lifestyle. In order to collect information on eating habits, a survey questionnaire consisting of 78 questions (sociodemographic data, lifestyle and eating behaviour) was formulated. 100 students participated in the research. Analyses show that people on average spent more time in front of the screen and had poorer quality of sleep, which corresponds to previously known trends. The results showed an increase in fruit and vegetable consumption and a decrease in alcohol consumption. A significant number of respondents increased the number of meals consumed daily and a higher percentage of self-prepared meals was found. It is reasonable to conclude that the target population of respondents adopted conventionally healthier eating habits during their stay in isolation.

Validacija upitnika je proces koji omogućava utvrđivanje u kojoj mjeri izrađeni upitnik daje informacije o onome za što je namijenjen. Kako bi se provela validacija upitnika o procjeni znanja o šećernoj bolesti korištenog u Kliničkoj bolnici Dubrava, izrađen je on-line upitnik istovjetan tekstom i fotografijama izvornom, pisanom obliku upitnika. Šećerna bolest je kronična, nezarazna bolest, karakterizirana hiperglikemijom koja je rezultat poremećaja lučenja inzulina, njegovog djelovanja ili oboje, a osnovni princip liječenja obuhvaća pravilnu prehranu uz edukaciju, samokontrolu i redovitu tjelesnu aktivnost. On-line upitnik kreiran je i proveden korištenjem Google obrazaca. Upitnik je proveden 2 puta, s minimalnim razmakom slanja od 14 dana. Validacija odgovora provedena je korištenjem sljedećih parametara: p-vrijednost i Cohenov d. Korištenje Cohenova d pokazalo se najboljim načinom procjene jasnoće pitanja upitnika. Zaključak je da postoji razlika među odgovorima u prvom i drugom krugu provedbe, kod šest pitanja upitnika od ukupno 23 pitanja upitnika. Kako bi rezultat rješavanja upitnika bilo isključivo znanje pacijenata, a ne posljedica nejasnoće pitanja, potrebno je izmijeniti nejasna pitanja koja su se pokazala problematičnima i/ili u edukaciji dodatno pojasniti tu temu. Questionnaire validation is a process that allows determination of the extent to which a questionnaire is designed to provide information about what it is intended for. In order to validate the Diabetes Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire used at the Dubrava Clinical Hospital, an online questionnaire was created identical to the text and photos of the original, written form of the questionnaire. Diabetes mellitus is a chronic, non-communicable disease characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin secretion, action or both, and the basic treatment principle includes proper nutrition with education, self-control and regular physical activity. An online questionnaire was created and implemented using Google Forms. The questionnaire was administered 2 times, with a minimum period in-between of 14 days. Validation of the answers was performed using the following parameters: p-value and Cohen's d. Use of Cohen's d proved to be the best way to assess the clarity of the question mark. The conclusion is that there is a difference between the answers in the first and second round of implementation, with six questions out of a total of 23 questions in the questionnaire. In order for the outcome of the questionnaire to be solved solely by patient knowledge and not by the ambiguity of the question, it is necessary to modify the questions that have proved fuzzy and/or to clarify this subject in further education.