Search

PCR techniques detecting interchromosomal translocation and clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangement (IgH) as disease markers in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) has been utilised past ten years. However, qualitative PCR detection of persisted minimal residual disease cannot provide clinically useful prognostic information and presently, quantitative approaches are required to predict patient outcome and assess response to the treatment. In some cases, "end-point" quantifying techniques, such as comparative PCR, are applicable and the relative estimation of differences in target quantity may serve in disease monitoring rather than absolute number of target copies.Our method of comparative PCR employs co-amplification of sequences of interest (clonal CDR3, bcl2/Jh) and the segment of Hras 1 gene(ras) as an internal standard. Serial dilutions of stored diagnostic DNAs from blood and bone marrow are examined in the same PCR and, after gel densitometry, the amount of initial target is assessed by comparing exponential products of co-amplification. The comparative PCR assay was utilized in monitoring of NHL patients cured either with conventional therapy, or with high-dose regimens and transplantation with stem cells, or with chimaeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab). Results from 50 monitored intervals obtained during several months up to several years were supplemented with clinical statements retrospectively. Some of patients became PCR-negative, reappearance of PCR-positivity was observed as well. The decrease or increase of disease marker corresponded to clinical observations. Results obtained from bone marrow were in agreement with those obtained from blood.End-point quantifying PCR comparative assay may provide an information on the increased risk of relapse and impact of the therapy. The predictive value of these methods depends on the frequency of sample taking and on the sensitivity of the method, which should be monitored in negative cases.

The level of minimal residual disease is an important prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The end of induction therapy is the most significant time-point for prediction of treatment outcome. Within a pilot study covered by the Paediatric Haematology Working Group in the Czech Republic 51 childhood patients were analysed at diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and at the end of induction using method based on detection of clonal rearrangements of immuno-receptor genes. The majority of tested patients (32/51, 63%) had a low or non-detectable levels of residual disease, a group of patients with the highest levels and thus the highest risk of relapse included 10% of patients (5/51). Within each of three risk groups one patient has relapsed so far. Therefore, the relapse rate in particular subgroups is 3% (1/32), 7% (1/14) and 20% (1/5) to date, respectively. The results are compared with these published by the BFM group (van Dongen et al., Lancet 1998). The pilot phase of a new BFM treatment protocols includes examination of residual disease for stratification of patients into the different risk groups.