Search

Copyright of Journal of Art History / Konsthistorisk Tidskrift is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The concept of body composition covers the division of the body into a number of compartments. The most important are the fat mass (FM), the fat-free mass (FFM), the total body protein and the total body bone mineral content. Numerous methods for the measurement of body composition are available. The three classical methods for the measurement of FM and FFM, namely underwater weighing, measurement of total body potassium and measurement of total body water by isotope dilution, are often regarded as reference methods. However, newer methods such as computed tomography, neutron activation analysis and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry are increasingly used because of their reliability and ability for independent measurement of two or more components. Bioelectrical impedance analysis has become popular because of its clinical applicability. Three- or four-compartment models involving combination of two, three or more separate methods are more accurate than single methods, but are usually confined to research purposes because of the laborious measurement procedures. Computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry have the unique possibility of regional measurements of body composition. Fat distribution and relative overweight may be estimated by simple anthropometric measures such as skinfold thicknesses. There are many applications for body composition measurements in research and clinical practice. These include treatment of obesity, growth hormone deficiency, diabetes mellitus and climacteric changes, as well as clinical nutrition and estimation of the hydration of dialysis patients and of critically ill intensive or surgical patients.

We examined whether the prevalence of vertebral fracture in otherwise healthy, 70-year-old Danish women had increased over a period of ten years. The population-based, epidemiological study included two age-matched, representative samples of postmenopausal women. Group 1 (1979) consisted of 173 healthy women without secondary causes of osteoporosis, Group 2 (1989) of 387 women. X-rays of the thoraco-lumbar spine were assessed for vertebral fracture by five radiological methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the prevalence of vertebral fracture and the 95% confidence intervals overlapped completely in all methods. The prevalence rates varied by method from 35% to 80% but the distribution of fracture types was similar in the two groups. We conclude that the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis has not increased since 1979 in suburban Copenhagen, and that comparison of prevalences requires the same method of radiological assessment.