Search

Aim: To assess what is known about the effectiveness of face‐to‐face self‐management programmes designed specifically for adolescents (10–19 years) with a chronic illness. Design: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis (SWiM). Data sources: Six international web‐based reference libraries were searched with a date range of 1946 to July 2020. Review method: The PRISMA statement and SWiM guideline were used for reporting the methods and results. The PICO format was used to develop a focused clinical question and the eligibility criteria of our review. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Cochrane Effective Practice Organisation of Care criteria. Results: Eight studies (four randomized controlled trials and four descriptive designs) met the inclusion criteria and were published between 2003 and 2017. Results of the review: Three studies demonstrated measures of illness control which showed initial improvements in adherence as a result of the interventions but failed to demonstrate sustained adherence over time. Booster sessions were identified as an effective strategy to improve adherence, but were often omitted. Conclusions: There is a limited body of evidence on the effectiveness of self‐management programmes specifically developed for adolescents with a chronic illness, an important but under researched area. Future research lies in the development of more rigorous studies that focus on quantitative outcome measures for evaluating the effectiveness of self‐management programmes to guide the development of future programmes. Impact: It is crucial for adolescents with a chronic illness to develop independence and the self‐management skills required to effectively manage their chronic condition as they transition to adulthood. On current evidence, in planning future self‐management interventions should include booster sessions. Nurses with additional training and experience have a key role in supporting adolescents with a chronic illness to develop self‐management skills as they assume responsibility for their own healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible Summary: What is known on the subject?: Internationally, stigma towards people with mental illness has reduced due to greater understanding, education and advocacy in the community, and more focus on recovery‐oriented care within practice guidelines.However, many people with a diagnosis of BPD continue to experience stigma and difficulty accessing health services. Contributing factors include lack of understanding of BPD and effective management by health professionals, stigma from the general population and within healthcare services, and financial and geographical barriers.Mental health nurses comprise a large part of the healthcare workforce responsible for the day‐to‐day care of people diagnosed with BPD. What the paper adds to existing knowledge: This paper investigates how Australian consumer perspectives on BPD management have changed over time. Comments from a large survey, delivered to consumers in 2011 (N = 153) and 2017 (N = 424), were analysed for common themes.Themes were broadly related to NHMRC BPD Guidelines sections released in 2013. These data sets therefore present an opportunity to evaluate changes in consumer perspectives pre‐ and post‐Guideline release. Although no direct causal relationship can be drawn, analysing these changes can potentially assist with understanding the impact of the Guidelines in practice. No such analysis of the Australian Guidelines has been conducted to date in the existing literature. What are the implications for practice?: Many people diagnosed with BPD continue to experience stigma, barriers to treatment and difficulty accessing appropriate services.Widespread practical implementation of the Guidelines was not apparent; however, improved general awareness and understanding of BPD from consumers and health professionals were evident. Improved education and practice across each and all aspects of the Guidelines are indicated.The Guidelines need review to ensure they are in‐line with current evidence‐based practice, as well as effective health professional education, support and funding to embed the revised Guidelines into practice. Introduction: Internationally, many individuals diagnosed with BPD continue to experience stigma within health care and are more likely to be viewed as manipulative and evoke negative responses from clinicians, compared with other mental health consumers. Aim/Question: To understand Australian consumer perspectives regarding BPD management, and how these have changed between 2011 and 2017. To comment on how NHMRC BPD Guidelines, released 2013, are faring in practice. Method: Individuals who identified a BPD diagnosis completed a 75‐question survey, delivered online Australia‐wide, in 2011 (N = 153) and 2017 (N = 424), providing comparative data sets to evaluate changes in consumer perspective on BPD management. Results: Many people diagnosed with BPD experience difficulties when seeking help, stigma within health services and barriers to treatment. Improved general awareness, communication and understanding of BPD from consumers and health professionals were evident. Discussion: Consumers demonstrated increased BPD‐literacy and help‐seeking behaviours in 2017, providing opportunity for health professionals to build stronger therapeutic relationships. Widespread practical implementation of the Guidelines does not appear to have been achieved. More health professional education, updated Guidelines, funding and strategies to embed these Guidelines into practice are needed. Implications for Practice: Mental health nurses regularly provide care to people diagnosed with BPD; with practical education and support, they and other health professionals can improve their confidence in practice and provide better quality care to consumers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Advanced Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim To examine health worker-client interactions during care planning to understand processes that foster client empowerment and disempowerment. Background It is unclear how health worker-client exchanges and information sharing through chronic condition care planning currently operate in primary health care. Moreover, it is unclear how control in these exchanges either enhances collaborative decision-making, partnership and client empowerment, or works to create client disempowerment and dependency on workers and health services. Design Critical discourse analysis of qualitative data from ethnographic observations and audio-taped worker-client consultations. Method Multidisciplinary teams in two Australian community-based primary healthcare sites participated. This included nurses, general practitioners and allied health workers and their clients who had a chronic condition care plan. Nineteen worker-client consultations were observed/recorded in 2011. Results Control was expressed through multiple processes inherent in the worker role and in their interactions with clients. When workers exercised disproportionate control and clients relinquished their own control, client disempowerment and dependency were evident. Clients' attempts to gain control and workers' attempts to relinquish control alleviated clients' disempowerment and dependency. However, structural features of information sharing systems and workers' care planning behaviours diminished such efforts. Conclusion Worker awareness of their communication style and the power of their role must improve for client chronic condition self-care management to be achieved. Training on the impacts of control in worker communication and systems where they work must be provided if unbeneficial forms of client dependency are to be overcome and true self-care management is to be realized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]