Search

This paper provides a probabilistic proof of the comparison result for viscosity solutions of path-dependent semilinear PDEs. We consider the notion of viscosity solutions introduced in [I. Ekren, et al., Ann. Probab., 42 (2014), pp. 204-236], which considers as test functions all those smooth processes which are tangent in mean. When restricted to the Markovian case, this definition induces a larger set of test functions and reduces to the notion of stochastic viscosity solutions analyzed in [E. Bayraktar and M. Sirbu, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 140 (2012), pp. 3645-3654; SIAM J. Control Optim., 51 (2013), pp. 4274-4294]. Our main result takes advantage of this enlargement of the test functions and provides an easier proof of comparison. This is most remarkable in the context of the linear path-dependent heat equation. As a key ingredient for our methodology, we introduce a notion of punctual differentiation, similar to the corresponding concept in the standard viscosity solutions [L. A. Caffarelli and X. Cabre, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 43, AMS, Providence, RI, 1995], and we prove that semimartingales are almost everywhere punctually differentiable. This smoothness result can be viewed as the counterpart of the Aleksandroff smoothness result for convex functions. A similar comparison result was established earlier in [I. Ekren et al., Ann. Probab., 42 (2014), pp. 204-236]. The result of this paper is more general and, more importantly, the arguments that we develop do not rely on any representation of the solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given a closed convex set A in a Banach space X, this paper considers the continuity and differentiability of A. The continuity of a closed convex set was introduced and studied by Gale and Klee [Math. Scand., 7 (1959), pp. 370--391] in terms of its support functional, and the differentiability of a closed convex set is a new notion introduced again in terms of its support functional. Using the technique of variational analysis, we prove that A is differentiable if and only if for every continuous linear (or convex) function f : X → R bounded below on A the corresponding optimization problem infxεA f(x) is well-posed solvable. In the reflexive space case, we prove that A is continuous if and only if for every continuous linear (or convex) function f : X → R bounded below on A the corresponding optimization problem infxεAf(x) is weakly well-posed solvable. We also prove that if the conjugate function f* of a given continuous convex function f on X is Fréchet differentiable (resp., continuous) on dom(f*), then for every closed convex set K in X with infxεKf(x) > - ∞ the corresponding optimization problem with objective f and constraint set K is well-posed (resp., weakly well-posed) solvable. In the framework of finite-dimensional spaces, several sharper results are established. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We characterize the subdifferential of the supremum function of finitely and infinitely indexed families of convex functions. The main contribution of this paper consists of providing formulas for such a subdifferential under weak continuity assumptions. The resulting formulas are given in terms of the exact subdifferential of the data functions at the reference point, and not at nearby points as in [Valadier, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 268 (1969), pp. 39--42]. We also derive new Fritz John- and KKT-type optimality conditions for semi-infinite convex optimization, omitting the continuity/closedness assumptions in [Dinh et al., ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 13 (2007), pp. 580--597]. When the family of functions is finite, we use continuity conditions concerning only the active functions, and not all the data functions as in [Rockafellar, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 39 (1979), pp. 331--355; Volle, Acta Math. Vietnam., 19 (1994), pp. 137--148]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]