Search

Background: Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (Lifeblood) performs human erythrocyte antigen (HEA) genotyping for a subset of repeat whole‐blood donors through preferential selection which aims to maximise variation of results and possibility of identifying donors lacking high frequency red cell antigens. Materials and Methods: The HEA Molecular Bead chip™ assay is used by Lifeblood for donor genotyping. A review of all donor HEA genotype data from March 2019 to May 2022 (3 years) was conducted. Results: HEA genotyping was performed for 20,185donors. Due to selective genotyping of donors, a higher frequency of R1R1 predicted phenotype was identified. However, frequencies of other red cell phenotypes were relatively similar to previous reported in the Australian population. A small number of donors with rare red cell phenotypes was identified. Conclusion: Genotyping of blood donors provides an available pool of extended matched red blood cell products for matching to recipients. Additionally genotyping can improve the identification of donors with rare phenotypes. Whilst limitations exist, genotyping may reduce the need for labour intensive serotyping, improve blood inventory management, and may be useful in donor recruitment and retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We report an obstetric case involving an RhD‐positive woman who had developed a red blood cell (RBC) antibody that was not detected until after delivery of a newborn, who presented with a positive direct antiglobulin test result. Immunohematology studies suggested that the maternal antibody was directed against a low‐prevalence antigen on the paternal and newborn RBCs. Results: Comprehensive blood group profiling by targeted exome sequencing revealed a novel nonsynonymous single nucleotide variant (SNV) RHCE c.486C>G (GenBank MZ326705) on the RHCE*Ce allele, for both the father and newborn. A subsequent genomic‐based study to profile blood groups in an Indigenous Australian population revealed the same SNV in 2 of 247 individuals. Serology testing showed that the maternal antibody reacted specifically with RBCs from these two individuals. Discussion: The maternal antibody was directed against a novel antigen in the Rh blood group system arising from an RHCE c.486C>G variant on the RHCE*Ce allele linked to RHD*01. The variant predicts a p.Asn162Lys change on the RhCE protein and has been registered as the 56th antigen in the Rh system, ISBT RH 004063. Conclusion: This antibody was of clinical significance, resulting in a mild to moderate hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). In the past, the cause of such HDFN cases may have remained unresolved. Genomic sequencing combined with population studies now assists in resolving such cases. Further population studies have potential to inform the need to design population‐specific red cell antibody typing panels for antibody screening in the Australian population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: A newborn presented with jaundice in Thailand. The cord red cells tested positive by direct antiglobulin test (DAT) for an unknown maternal red cell antibody. Initial blood group sequencing suggested that the infant carried a novel variant RHAG c.140T>C, responsible for a low‐prevalence antigen in the RHAG blood group system (ISBT 030). We report here on testing of samples from the infant's parents and older sibling to define a new antigen in the RHAG system. Materials and Methods: Massive parallel sequencing (MPS) using a custom‐designed panel was performed on all four family members. Extended serological testing was also performed to determine whether family members with the same variant as the infant showed reactivity with the antibody in the maternal plasma. Results: We identified a novel single nucleotide variant (SNV) (RHAG c.140T>C, p.[Phe47Ser]) in samples from three of the four family members tested (the infant, the older sibling and the father). The variant was not detected in the mother's sample. Maternal plasma showed positive agglutination with all family members tested; however, when tested with routine panel cells, no reactivity was observed. Conclusion: This case study showed that the presence of the novel variant (RHAG c.140T>C), encoding a p.(Phe47Ser) change in the RhAG glycoprotein, was the apparent cause of incompatibility between maternal plasma and that of red cells from the proband, father and older sibling of the proband. We propose this variant to be a new low‐prevalence antigen in the RHAG blood group system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the last decade, Australia has experienced an overall decline in red cell demand, but there has been an increased need for phenotyped matched red cells. Lifeblood and mathematicians from Queensland universities have developed a probabilistic model to determine the percentage of the donor panel that would need extended antigen typing to meet this increasing demand, and an estimated timeline to achieve the optimum required phenotyped (genotyped) panel. Mathematical modelling, based on Multinomial distributions, was used to provide guidance on the percentage of typed donor panel needed, based on recent historical blood request data and the current donor panel size. Only antigen combinations determined to be uncommon, but not rare, were considered. Simulations were run to attain at least 95% success percentage. Modelling predicted a target of 38% of the donor panel, or 205,000 donors, would need to be genotyped to meet the current demand. If 5% of weekly returning donors were genotyped, this target would be reached within 12 years. For phenotyping, 35% or 188,000 donors would need to be phenotyped to meet Lifeblood's demand. With the current level of testing, this would take eight years but could be performed within three years if testing was increased to 9% of weekly returning donors. An additional 26,140 returning donors need to be phenotyped annually to maintain this panel. This mathematical model will inform business decisions and assist Lifeblood in determining the level of investment required to meet the desired timeline to achieve the optimum donor panel size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Red cell antigen genotyping is commonly performed on patients requiring chronic transfusion support, such as sickle cell disease and thalassaemia. The Immucor HEA BeadChip™ test, in addition to assessing red cell antigen expression, can also detect the haemoglobin S (HbS) mutation. Our aim was to compare HbS results using HEA BeadChip™ performed at the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood with conventional haemoglobin studies. Materials and Methods: Patients with thalassaemia and sickle cell trait (SCT) or disease (SCD) referred for red cell genotyping between 2017 and 2019 were assessed. The HbS result obtained from HEA BeadChip™ was compared with that obtained from high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) performed by the referring pathology provider. Results: One‐hundred and nineteen cases had comparable HPLC and HEA BeadChip™ results. On HEA BeadChip™ testing, 40 cases showed a negative HbS result, 31 cases showed HbS+ and 47 cases showed HbS++. There was one case with 'low signal' result. Of the negative HbS cases, there was none with SCT. The HbS+ group comprised a mixture of SCT and SCD due to compound heterozygosity for HbS and β‐thalassaemia mutations. The HbS++ group comprised predominantly SCD due to homozygosity for HbS. Conclusion: HEA BeadChip™ is an accurate screening test for the detection of HbS. There were no false positives or false negatives. The identification of donors with the HbS mutation through the targeted genotyping programme would enable early intervention, improved donor management and reduced wastage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (Lifeblood) performs red blood cell (RBC) antibody screening on every whole blood donation. An alternate strategy has been proposed whereby an antibody screen is performed on the first donation and only repeated following pregnancy, transfusion or a significant break between donations (>2 years). We assess the blood safety risks associated with removing antibody screening for every whole blood donation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective desktop analysis included all whole blood donations collected by Lifeblood between 01 May 2018 and 30 April 2019 to quantify the antibodies that would have been undetected with the alternate strategy. The strategy was further assessed using the Alliance of Blood Operators Risk‐Based Decision‐Making framework. Results: One hundred and seventy‐one routine donors had antibodies for the first time, but reported no sensitizing event since their last donation. Forty‐seven of these had antibodies of a clinically significant specificity and titre that have the potential to cause a haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR). The calculated risk of undetected antibodies being transfused to an incompatible recipient is 1 in 82,200. Conclusion: The estimated risk of HTRs with the alternate strategy results in an increased risk. While the alternate strategy is identified as the most cost‐effective option within the Australian setting, this additional residual risk was not deemed to be acceptable. Blood services would need to determine whether the increase in residual risk stemming from implementation of such a strategy is tolerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maternal alloimmunisation against red blood cell antigens can cause haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Although most frequently caused by anti‐D, since the implementation of rhesus D (RhD) immunoglobulin prophylaxis, other alloantibodies have become more prevalent in HDFN. Recent advances in non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) have allowed early prediction of HDFN risk in alloimmunised pregnancies and allow clinicians to focus health resources on those pregnancies that require intervention. This article aims to provide updates on the current status of NIPT in Australia as both a diagnostic and screening tool in pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blood group single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping probes for a limited range of polymorphisms. This study investigated whether massively parallel sequencing (also known as next-generation sequencing), with a targeted exome strategy, provides an extended blood group genotype and the extent to which massively parallel sequencing correctly genotypes in homologous gene systems, such as RH and MNS.Study Design and Methods: Donor samples (n = 28) that were extensively phenotyped and genotyped using single nucleotide polymorphism typing, were analyzed using the TruSight One Sequencing Panel and MiSeq platform. Genes for 28 protein-based blood group systems, GATA1, and KLF1 were analyzed. Copy number variation analysis was used to characterize complex structural variants in the GYPC and RH systems.Results: The average sequencing depth per target region was 66.2 ± 39.8. Each sample harbored on average 43 ± 9 variants, of which 10 ± 3 were used for genotyping. For the 28 samples, massively parallel sequencing variant sequences correctly matched expected sequences based on single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping data. Copy number variation analysis defined the Rh C/c alleles and complex RHD hybrids. Hybrid RHD*D-CE-D variants were correctly identified, but copy number variation analysis did not confidently distinguish between D and CE exon deletion versus rearrangement.Conclusion: The targeted exome sequencing strategy employed extended the range of blood group genotypes detected compared with single nucleotide polymorphism typing. This single-test format included detection of complex MNS hybrid cases and, with copy number variation analysis, defined RH hybrid genes along with the RHCE*C allele hitherto difficult to resolve by variant detection. The approach is economical compared with whole-genome sequencing and is suitable for a red blood cell reference laboratory setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We routinely screen all plasma for transfusion for anti-A and anti-B titres to enable the use of low-titre products for minor ABO-incompatible transfusions. The initial proposal suggested by Romon et al. of dedicating plasma units specifically for transfusion, and screening only those units for irregular antibodies, is a practice that is currently implemented in Australia. The authors have also considered the use of alternative plasma preparations, though we do not issue freeze-dried plasma or liquid plasma (that is never frozen) in Australia. [Extracted from the article]

The article presents a study that determines the effectiveness of a proposed low-frequency antigen in the Augustine (AUG) bloc group system in fetus and newborn children with hemolytic disease. It offers brief description of the method and procedures of the study, as well as the discussion of the result. It outlines the findings of the study which demonstrates the clinical significance of antibodies to antigens in the AUG system.

Background and Objectives Materials and Methods Results Conclusion Some blood operators routinely screen blood donations for high‐titre (HT) anti‐A/B to reduce the risk of a haemolytic transfusion reaction due to out‐of‐group plasma‐rich components. We assessed donor factors associated with an increased likelihood of screening positive and compared routine data between England and Australia.Data were assessed from HT screening during 2018–2020 in Australia and 2018–2021 in England, totalling nearly 6 million blood donations. Screening was performed using a Beckman Coulter PK7300 analyser with a micro‐titre plate saline direct agglutination test in both countries, although different reagent red cells were chosen. HT‐positive was defined as testing positive at a titre of 128 or above.The likelihood of a donor testing HT‐positive was greater for females than males, declined with age and was dependent on the ABO group. However, the proportion of donors testing HT‐positive was consistently higher in Australia than in England: overall, 14% of group O donations and 5% of group A donations in England tested HT‐positive, compared with 51% and 22%, respectively in Australia. English data also showed that donors from Black, Asian or mixed ethnic backgrounds were more likely to test HT‐positive than White donors.These data demonstrate that donor sex, age, ABO group and ethnicity affect the likelihood of testing HT‐positive. Differences in testing methods likely had a significant impact on the proportion of donors testing as HT‐positive or ‐negative rather than any differences in donor populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]