Search

Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-28T19:49:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022-01-01 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) Several studies have reported the relationship of deforestation with increased incidence of infectious diseases, mainly due to the deregulation caused in these environments. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: a) is increased loss of vegetation related to dengue cases in the Brazilian Cerrado? b) how do different regions of the tropical savanna biome present distinct patterns for total dengue cases and vegetation loss? c) what is the projection of a future scenario of deforestation and an increased number of dengue cases in 2030? Thus, this study aimed to assess the relationship between loss of native vegetation in the Cerrado and dengue infection. In this paper, we quantify the entire deforested area and dengue infection cases from 2001 to 2019. For data analyses, we used Poisson generalized linear model, descriptive statistics, cluster analysis, non-parametric statistics, and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to predict loss of vegetation and fever dengue cases for the next decade. Cluster analysis revealed the formation of four clusters among the states. Our results showed significant increases in loss of native vegetation in all states, with the exception of Piauí. As for dengue cases, there were increases in the states of Minas Gerais, São Paulo, and Mato Grosso. Based on projections for 2030, Minas Gerais will register about 4,000 dengue cases per 100,000 inhabitants, São Paulo 750 dengue cases per 100,000 inhabitants, and Mato Grosso 500 dengue cases per 100,000 inhabitants. To reduce these projections, Brazil will need to control deforestation and implement public health, environmental and social policies, requiring a joint effort from all spheres of society. Graduate Program in Agronomy–Cropping Systems São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP Graduate Program in Geography São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Technology and Sciences, SP Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Chapadão do Sul, MS Federal University of Acre (UFAC) Graduate Program in Agronomy State University of Londrina (Uel), PR Graduate Program in Sciences—Nuclear Energy in Agriculture Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura São Paulo University São Paulo State University (Unesp) Engineering School, SP Graduate Program in Geography Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Três Lagoas, MS Graduate Program in Agronomy–Cropping Systems São Paulo State University (Unesp), SP Graduate Program in Geography São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Technology and Sciences, SP São Paulo State University (Unesp) Engineering School, SP CNPq: 303767/2020-0

Schistosomiasis causes severe morbidity in many countries with endemic infection with the schistosome digenean parasites in Africa and Asia. To control and eliminate the disease resulting from infection, regular mass drug administration (MDA) is used, with a focus on school-aged children (SAC; 5–14 years of age). In some high transmission settings, the World Health Organization (WHO) also recommends the inclusion of at-risk adults in MDA treatment programmes. The question of whether ecology (age-dependant exposure) or immunity (resistance to reinfection), or some combination of both, determines the form of observed convex age-intensity profile is still unresolved, but there is a growing body of evidence that the human hosts acquire some partial level of immunity after a long period of repeated exposure to infection. In the majority of past research modelling schistosome transmission and the impact of MDA programmes, the effect of acquired immunity has not been taken into account. Past work has been based on the assumption that age-related contact rates generate convex horizontal age-intensity profiles. In this paper, we use an individual based stochastic model of transmission and MDA impact to explore the effect of acquired immunity in defined MDA programmes. Compared with scenarios with no immunity, we find that acquired immunity makes the MDA programme less effective with a slower decrease in the prevalence of infection. Therefore, the time to achieve morbidity control and elimination as a public health problem is longer than predicted by models with just age-related exposure and no build-up of immunity. The level of impact depends on the baseline prevalence prior to treatment (the magnitude of the basic reproductive number R0) and the treatment frequency, among other factors. We find that immunity has a larger impact within moderate to high transmission settings such that it is very unlikely to achieve morbidity and transmission control employing current MDA programmes., Author summary The question of ‘ecology or immunology’ as determinants of the shape of age intensity profiles of infection is still not resolved, but a degree of immunity is believed to slowly build up over long periods of exposure. In this study we show that acquired immunity dependent on the integral of past exposure to infection has a strong effect on the potential impact of MDA programmes to control morbidity induced by schistosome infection. We employ an individual based stochastic model of parasite transmission and control to demonstrate the effects of acquired immunity. In particular, we show that MDA programmes are less effective if human hosts acquire some level of immunity in proportion to the sum of an individual’s past exposure to infection. If acquired immunity is acting with strength, in some moderate to high transmission settings, we show that the current treatment guidelines are unlikely to achieve morbidity control and elimination as a public health problem. This suggests that programme adaptations to increase the frequency of treatment where at all possible are required. This study aims to provide health workers with quantitative tools to assess what treatment strategies are best applied in given epidemiological settings.

The São Tomé e Príncipe government is committed to achieving neglected tropical disease (NTD) control and elimination as a public health problem by 2025. In 2014, the Ministry of Health led a national survey to determine the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) and schistosomiasis across the country. Following this survey, a preventive chemotherapy (PC) campaign with mebendazole and praziquantel reached 31 501 school-age children in 2015. A follow-up 2017 survey to determine the impact of the intervention showed success in controlling schistosomiasis, as no infections were found, but limited impact on STHs, with prevalence similar to pretreatment levels. The survey also investigated the prevalence of a third NTD, lymphatic filariasis (LF), which was found to be endemic in the country. Since then the Ministry of Health has developed the Strategic Plan for the Fight Against Neglected Tropical Diseases 2019–2025 and identified gaps to be addressed. This narrative review systematises the existing literature reporting on the epidemiology of NTDs for which there are PC programs in São Tomé e Príncipe. PubMed was searched for relevant papers that measured the prevalence of LF, schistosomiasis and STHs. Additionally, data provided by the Ministry of Health surveys were analysed. Finally, we discuss current NTD control, including the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and identify priorities for program strengthening and operational research.