Search

This paper studies grade 7 (age 13) students' expressed understanding about the equal sign/notion of equivalence in order to investigate what aspects of the concept that could be seen as an established knowledge at lower secondary school/middle school. Using items from different instruments and combining these to a new one that covered a broad spectrum of procedural and conceptual knowledge, we collected data from 159 students. The different statistical tests showed that if focusing only on separate items, it could confirm that students could be seen either having operational or relational understanding of the equal sign. However, when taking all results into account using several analyses, students' understanding appear to be much more complex. Instead of a dichotomized view, students' expressed knowledge of mathematical equivalence should be seen as a continuum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Research on mathematical equivalence, and to some extent, on number structure in early grade mathematics, has shown that most students at primary and secondary levels understand these concepts instrumentally rather than relationally. The study reported in this paper uses a design research approach to explore both mathematical equivalence and number structure in a primary pre-service teacher education programme at a university in South Africa and reports on an intervention strategy intended to culminate in developing design principles comprising guidelines for the effective teaching of number structure and mathematics equivalence in primary pre-service teacher education programmes. The mixed method study comprises 70 first-year primary pre-service teachers (PSTs) and a teacher educator. The PSTs wrote pre- and post-tests, and were interviewed following the pre-test. Skemp's notion of relational and instrumental understanding guided the design of the intervention and the analysis of the data. The results from the study indicates that PSTs' understanding of the notion of equivalence is similar to what has been reported for students in schools, and that there were some learning gains in the post-test results. Based on the findings from the study in general, some emergent design principles are proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding of the equal sign is associated with early algebraic competence in the elementary grades and equation-solving success in middle school. Thus, it is important to find ways to build foundational understanding of the equal sign as a relational symbol. Past work promoted a conception of the equal sign as meaning "the same as". However, recent work highlights another dimension of relational understanding—a substitutive conception, which emphasizes the idea that an expression can be substituted for another equivalent one. This work suggests a substitutive conception may support algebra performance above and beyond a sameness conception alone. In this paper, we share a subset of results from an online intervention designed to foster a relational understanding of the equal sign among fourth and fifth graders (n = 146). We compare lessons focused on a sameness conception alone and a dual sameness and substitutive conception to each other, and we compare both to a control condition. The lessons influenced students' likelihood of producing and endorsing sameness and substitutive definitions of the equal sign. However, the impact of the lessons on students' approaches to missing value equations was less clear. We discuss possible interpretations, and we argue that further research is needed to explore the roles of sameness and substitutive views of the equal sign in supporting structural approaches to algebraic equation solving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is important for students to develop a relational understanding of the equal sign, but students often have simultaneous operational and relational conceptions (i.e., SOR conceptions). This case study carefully explored how a student's conception of the equal sign changed during a classroom teaching experiment and analyzed the possibilities and difficulties in developing the student's conception of the equal sign. At first, the student demonstrated her understanding of only those equations in the form a ± b = c by using the operational conception of the equal sign. Given an unfamiliar equation in the form a ± b = c ± d = e, the student revealed the relational conception but still evaluated an incorrect equation as correct using the operational conception. Her SOR conception did not change easily despite considerable classroom discussion. When the teacher explained the meaning of the equal sign and connected it with a pan balance, the student understood the meaning of quantitative sameness of the equal sign and showed a stable relational conception. Later, in equations of the form a ± b = c ± d, the student's conception progressed to the comparative relational conception. Given the progression, this study focused on the noticeable shifts in the student's conceptions of the equal sign, and this article discusses both theoretical and pedagogical implications regarding students' conceptions of the equal sign. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate how the 8th graders interpreted the equal sign in the pan balance activities they created on Scratch. Five eighth graders (4 girls and 1 boy) in Turkey participated in this study. Case study was employed as a qualitative research method. Data was gathered through the Scratch files created by the students and the think-aloud protocol interviews with them. The questions used in the activities were prepared in accordance with the test created by Matthews et al. (2012). For data analysis, content and descriptive analysis methods were employed. Findings showed that participants interpreted the operational questions as operational and relational questions as relational through using Scratch. Another significant finding emerged in Scratch activities was the fact that in order for the code block to provide an equation, the pan balance was supposed to balance. Employing Scratch in the class teachings may provide variety in learning environments for teaching of equal sign. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to determine how prospective middle school mathematics teachers respond to students' errors in the questions about the equal sign. This study utilizes case study method. In this case study, hypothetical scenarios, involving three common error types related to the equal sign, have been prepared by using the possible examples of student work. Through these scenarios, one-to-one interviews were conducted with seven prospective middle school mathematics teachers. In line with the data obtained in these interviews, it was seen that the prospective teachers used seven different ways to respond to students' errors related to the equal sign: showing the error, showing the right solution, guiding to find the right answer, guiding to find the error, re-explaining the concept, in-depth research, and false intervention. In addition, it was determined that two prospective teachers intervened incorrectly by taking an approach that could support the thought that led to the error. In the light of the findings, it was seen that the prospective teachers had a limited understanding of the equal sign. This study suggests that mathematics educators should create appropriate learning opportunities to improve prospective teachers' understanding of the equal sign and their ability to respond to students' errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research focuses on ways in which balance scales mediate students' relational understandings of the equal sign. Participants included 21 Kindergarten–Grade 2 students who took part in an early algebra classroom intervention focused in part on developing a relational understanding of the equal sign through the use of balance scales. Students participated in pre-, mid- and post-intervention interviews in which they were asked to evaluate true-false equations and solve open number sentences. Students often worked with balance scales while solving these tasks. Interview analyses revealed several categories of affordances of these tools for supporting students' productive thinking about equations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]