Search

End-of-treatment (EoT) PET/CT is used as a guide to omit radiotherapy (RT) patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). We present the mature and extended results of a retrospective study evaluating the prognostic significance of EoT-PET/CT after adequate response to R-CHOP. Among 231 consecutive PMLBCL patients, 182 underwent EoT-PET/CT and were evaluated according to the Deauville 5-point scale (D5PS) criteria. Freedom from progression (FFP) was measured from the time of PET/CT examination. Among 182 patients, 72 (40%) had D5PS score 1 (D5PSS-1), 33 (18%) had 2, 28 (15%) had 3, 29 (16%) had 4, and 20 (11%) had 5. The 5-year FFP was 97, 94, 92, 82, and 44% for D5PSS-1, D5PSS-2, D5PSS-3, D5PSS-4, and D5PSS-5, respectively. Among 105 patients with unequivocally negative PET/CT (D5PSS-1/D5PSS-2), 49 (47%) received RT (median dose 3420 cGy) and 56 (53%) did not with relapses in 0/49 vs. 4/56 patients (2 mediastinum and 2 isolated CNS relapses).The 5-year FFP for those who received RT or not was 100% versus 96%, when isolated CNS relapses were censored (p = 0.159). Among D5PSS-3 patients (27/28 irradiated-median dose 3600 cGy), the 5-year FFP was 92%. The 5-year FFP for D5PSS-4 and D5PSS-5 was 82 and 44%; 44/49 patients received RT (median dose 4000 and 4400 cGy for D5PSS-4 and D5PSS-5). Our study supports the omission of RT in a sizeable fraction of PET/CT-negative patients and definitely discourages salvage chemotherapy and ASCT in patients with PMLBCL who conventionally respond to R-CHOP, solely based on PET/CT positivity in the absence of documented progressive or multifocal disease. The persistence of positive PET/CT with D5PSS < 5 after consolidative RT should not trigger the initiation of further salvage chemotherapy in the absence of conventionally defined PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic myelogenous leukemia at blast crisis with a T-cell phenotype (T-ALL CML-BC) at diagnosis, without any prior history of CML is extremely rare. After the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), CML patients have a median survival comparable to general population and accelerated/blast crisis are rarely encountered. Most CML patients (80%) transform into acute myeloid leukemia and the rest into B-ALL. Anecdotal cases of Ph+ T-ALL, either de novo or in the context of CML-BC have been reported. Left shift in the blood, the presence of splenomegaly/extramedullary infiltration and the occurrence of BCR::ABL1 rearrangement in both the blastic population, as well as in the myeloid cell compartment are key points in differentiating de novo Ph+ T-ALL from T-ALL CML-BC. The latter is a rare entity, characterized by extramedullary disease, p210 transcript and clonal evolution. Lack of preceding CML does not rule out the diagnosis of T-ALL CML-BC. Prompt TKI treatment with ALL-directed therapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation may offer long-term survival in this otherwise poor prognosis entity. In this paper, we describe a patient with T-ALL CML-BC at presentation, still alive 51 months after diagnosis and we offer a review of the literature on this rare subject. All clinical and laboratory features are provided in order to distinguish de novo Ph+ T-ALL from T-ALL CML-BC, underscoring the prognostic and therapeutic significance of such a differentiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Yet, the description of a polymorphic cell infiltration in LN biopsy, the absence of clinical lymphadenopathy at presentation, the history of psoriatic arthritis as well as the preceded treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and cyclosporine raised diagnostic concerns. Although the patient could not finally avoid R-CHOP immunochemotherapy, this case highlights that a trial of NBA withdrawal under very close monitoring could be a rational therapeutic choice even in patients with aggressive ID-LPDs. Keywords: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; psoriasis; infliximab; apremilast; novel biologic agent; anti-TNF EN diffuse large B-cell lymphoma psoriasis infliximab apremilast novel biologic agent anti-TNF 1695 1700 6 10/12/23 20231001 NES 231001 The association of psoriasis with cancer has been a matter of debate, especially in the era of the novel biologic agents (NBA). Lastly, taking into consideration our case with the re-appearance of the lymphoma despite the change of NBA as well as all the other cases described in Table 1, the appearance of LPDs in psoriatic patients is a more complex process influenced by clinical disease duration and extension, the time length of immunosuppression and the nature of the various treatments administered. [Extracted from the article]

The long-term survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated according to the current standard of care is excellent. Combined-modality schedules (ABVD plus radiotherapy) in early-stage disease, along with treatment intensity adaptation to early metabolic response assessed by PET/CT in advanced stage HL, have been the cornerstones of risk stratification and treatment decision-making, minimizing treatment-related complications while keeping efficacy. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients are primary refractory or relapse after front-line treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents, namely Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), have already shown outstanding efficacy in a relapsed/refractory setting in recent landmark studies. Several phase 2 single-arm studies suggest that the addition of these agents in the frontline setting could further improve long-term disease control permitting one to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic drugs. However, a longer follow-up is needed. At the time of this writing, the only randomized phase 3 trial so far published is the ECHELON-1, which compares 1 to 1 BV-AVD (Bleomycin is replaced by BV) with standard ABVD in untreated advanced-stage III and IV HL. The ECHELON-1 trial has proven that BV-AVD is safe and more effective both in terms of long-term disease control and overall survival. Just recently, the results of the S1826 SWOG trial demonstrated that the combination nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) is better than BV-AVD, while preliminary results of other randomized ongoing phase 3 trials incorporating anti-PD-1 in this setting will be soon available. The aim of this review is to present the recent data regarding these novel agents in first-line treatment of HL and to highlight current and future trends which will hopefully reshape the overall management of this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R compared with R-CHOP as frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: clinical outcomes of the phase III intergroup trial alliance/CALGB 50303. The latter do not carry concurrent c-myc/bcl-2 and/or bcl-6 rearrangements and usually have the morphology of HGBL with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt lymphoma (HGBL-DLBCL/BL). Dear Editor, In the 2016 WHO classification, HGBL was defined as a separate entity, classified into double/triple-hit lymphomas and HGBL not otherwise specified (HGBL-NOS). [Extracted from the article]

• PMLBCL rarely extends to extranodal subdiaphragmatic (ES) sites at diagnosis. • Among 455 patients, 32 (7%) had such localization at baseline. • Kidney, liver, and adrenals were most frequently involved. • ES site involvement had not independent prognostic impact beyond that of stage IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]