Search

Background Aims: The emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, radically altered the management of GISTs and sparked controversy regarding the role of hepatic resection for metastatic tumors. This study aims to identify whether there is improvement in the overall survival of patients with gastrointestinal liver metastases, undergoing hepatic resection in the context of multimodal treatment strategy, as to those approached only by systemic therapy. Methods: Using a retrospective database, we identified 57 patients treated at our center over a 12-year period: Group A (n=31) underwent hepatic resection alongside systemic therapies, and B (n=26) only systemic therapies. In order to obtain a more robust sample, needed for the survival analysis, we performed a propensity score matching and a bootstrapping selection with Jackknife correction for errors; thus, we created an extended sample of 1000 virtual patients. Results: The overall survival measured in all patients was 47 months (95%CI:34-60); significantly higher for group A (56 months, 95%CI:37-75) compared to group B (38 months, 95%CI:19-56), (p=0.007, Log Rank test). Multivariate analysis identified one risk factor: the presence synchronous liver metastases upon diagnosis of primary. Conclusions: Liver resection following TKI therapy is the current mainstay of treatment strategy for potential cure and prolonged survival, in appropriately selected patients evaluated in an multidisciplinary tumor board., (Celsius.)

Introduction: Laparoscopic techniques have been increasingly adopted in the field of General Surgery in the last decades. The main disadvantages of laparoscopy are related to limited degrees of freedom of instruments and poor ergonomics, which are associated with a steep learning curve. Robotic surgery overcomes most of the technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to expand the indications of minimal access surgery (MAS) in procedures that are difficult to perform using laparoscopy. Methods: Patients who underwent MAS resections of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) between January 2002 and October 2018 in a single Surgical Department were retrospectively analysed. Demographic data as well as the following characteristics were recorded for each patient: age, sex, symptoms, tumour location and size, type of surgical procedure, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, histopathological assessment of resection margins, and incidence of perioperative complications. Results: The mean patient age was 58 (range, 27-81 years). Most lesions were found on the great curvature (7) and in the distal stomach or antrum (7), respectively. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic resection, while five patients had robotic resection of gastric GISTs. Surgical laparoscopic treatment consisted of antrectomy (n=4) and wedge gastrectomy (n=16). In all robotic cases a wedge gastrectomy was performed. One patient was converted to open surgery due to adhesions from previous operation. The mean operative time was 130 minutes (range, 70-210 minutes).The mean tumour size was 3.8 cm (range, 2-7 cm). There were no complications except one case that required reoperation for postoperative bleeding. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: The MAS approach of gastric GISTs is safe and effective and it is associated with low morbidity. Therefore, it should constitute the first option in patients with small tumours and favourable locations. The only limiting factor for the widespread use of MAS resections for gastric GISTs is surgeon expertise in this challenging technique., (Celsius.)

The Romanian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SRED) and the Romanian Association of Endoscopic Surgery (ARCE) have decided to establish a joint working group to elaborate specific recommendations for organizing the diagnostic and the minimally invasive interventional procedures, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recommendations are based on the guidelines of the international societies of endoscopy and gastroenterology (ESGE / BSG / ASGE / ACG / AGA), respectively endoscopic surgery (EAES SAGES) (4-8), on the experience of countries severely affected by the pandemic (Italy, France, Spain, USA, Germany, etc.) and they will be applied within the limits of measures imposed at local and governmental level by the competent authorities. On the other hand, these recommendations should have a dynamic evolution, depending on the upward or downward trend of the COVID-19 pandemic at regional and local level, but also according to the findings of professional and academic societies, requiring regular reviews based on the publica tion of further recommendations or international clinical trials. The objectives of the SRED and ARCE recommendations target the endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery activities, to support their non discriminatory used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, pursuing the demonstrated benefits of these procedures, in safe conditions for patients and medical staff., (Celsius.)

Background: Liver transplant (LT) recipients are at increased risk for developing metabolic syndrome. Early detection of NAFLD and other components of the metabolic syndrome is an important step in reducing morbidity and mortality. Methods: We assessed 60 liver transplant recipients for clinical and biological features, performed abdominal ultrasound and transient elastography (TE) Fibroscan© with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), calculated non-invasive scoring systems APRI, FIB-4, NAFLD score, cardiovascular risk (Framingham risk score) and for the presence of metabolic syndrome and performed two biomarkers: beta 7 integrin and carbonic anhydrase IX. Results: Sixty liver transplant recipients underwent clinical and biochemical evaluation, abdominal ultrasound and TE with CAP. The median age was 56.5 years and the median time from transplantation 35 months. The Spearman correlation coefficient of beta 7 integrin and the liver stiffness measurement values obtained via Fibroscan© we obtained a moderate correlation r=0.31, but a significant association (p=0.01). The univariate analysis showed significant association between both biomarkers and liver fibrosis assessed with a cut-off value of advanced fibrosis of 8.7 kPa. The carbonic anhydrase IX showed a better correlation when compared to the liver stiffness with a correlation coefficient of 0.43 and p-value=0.0007 and a moderate correlation when compared to both FIB-4 (r=0.27) and APRI (r=0.27) score for liver fibrosis but with a significant p value=0.04, respectively 0.03., Conclusion: We consider very important for our patients the development of new non-invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of NAFLD and NASH, as the "gold-standard" of liver biopsy is not easily accepted in clinical practice. Also NAFLD and NASH are dynamic processes that need prospective and repeated assessments, a need that cannot be met by the classical liver biopsy., (Celsius.)

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is usually diagnosed in the 7th decade, but cases diagnosed in younger patients are associated with a greater disease burden, through the potential years of life lost. The aim of our study was to compare the differences in risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment options between patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma below 45 years of age (very early onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma - VEOPC), and those diagnosed over 45 years. Methods: A retrospective study has been conducted by registering in standardized Excel Worksheets all PC cases diagnosed in our tertiary referral center between 01.01.2015 and 31.12.2017. Only patients with a documented diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were included in the statistical analysis that has been conducted using the NCSS v9 Statistical Software package. Categorical data have been compared using Chi2 test or Fisher Exact as appropriate, with a statistical significance p value 0.05. Results: There were 296 patients diagnosed with pancreatic solid tumors during the study period, 183 cases with documented histology: 80.87% PDAC, 17.5% neuroendocrine tumors, 2 cases of LMNH and 1 MANEC tumor. In our study group there were 24 patients (16.22%) with VEOPC. Family history of pancreatic neoplasia (33.3% vs 1.03%, p=0.0004) and alcohol consumption (42.86% vs 5.41%, p=0.01) were significantly more prevalent in young patients. Pain, as primary symptom, was reported at higher rates in patients with VEOPC (60% vs 22.94%, p=0.006). Tumors were more frequently located in the head of the pancreas in younger patients (56.52%) and in the body of the pancreas in older patients (52.07%, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in therapy or death rate during follow-up period between the two study groups, although patients diagnosed under 45 years were more frequently subjected to a radical resection (33.3% vs 22.69%). Conclusions: Our study has identified alcohol consumption and family history of pancreatic neoplasia as risk factors for VEOPC. Pain is the primary symptom at diagnosis in young patients with PDAC. In our cohort, therapeutic options do not differ significantly in PDAC patients with age of onset., (Celsius.)

High resolution manometry (HRM) is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of achalasia and other functional esophageal disorders. All patients accusing dysphagia should be endoscopically evaluated prior to manometric investigations in order to rule out pseudoachalasia. The Chicago HRM classification has led to a subclassification of three manometric types of achalasia that seem to have different results to treatment. None of the actual achalasia treatment options are curative. Type II achalasia patients respond best to all treatment options compared to those with types I and III. Pneumatic dilation (PD) or Heller miotomy (LHM) can be both chosen as initial therapy in type I and II as they have good outcome , while type III achalasia patients respond better to LHM as a first therapeutic option. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising new technique but long-term follow-up studies for its safety and efficacy must be performed. This article reviews the current therapeutic options in achalasia and other functional esophageal disorders, based on the differences in safety and efficacy between approaches, highlighting the impact of HRM to predict the outcome but also the role of the techinque in guiding antireflux surgery., (Celsius.)

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) has become an established treatment for end-stage liver disease, with more than 20.000 procedures yearly worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of Romanian National Program of LT. Methods: Between April 2000 and April 2017, 817 pts received 852 LTs in Romania. Male/female ratio was 487/330, while adult/pediatric ratio was 753/64, with a mean age of 46 years (median 50 yrs; range 7 months - 68 yrs). Main LT indications were HBV cirrhosis (230 pts; 28.2%), HCC (173 pts; 21.2%), and HCV cirrhosis (137 pts; 16.8%). Waiting time and indications for LT, patient and donor demographics, graft features, surgical procedures, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: DDLT was performed in 682 pts (83.9%): whole LT in 662 pts (81%), split LT in 16 pts (2.3%), reduced LT in 2 pts (0.2%), and domino LT in 1 pts (0.1%). LDLT was performed in 135 pts (16.5%): right hemiliver in 93 pts (11.4%), left lateral section in 28 pts (3.4%), left hemiliver in 8 pts (1%), left hemiliver with segment 1 in 4 pts (0.5%), and dual graft LDLT in 2 pts (0.2%). Overall major morbidity rate was 31.4% (268 pts), while perioperative mortality was 7.9% (65 pts). Retransplantation rate was 4.3% (35 pts): 27 whole LTs, 3 reduced LTs, 3 split LTs, and 2 LDLT. Long-term overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimated survival rates for patients were 87.9%, 81.5%, and 79.1%, respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year overall mortality on waiting list also decreased significantly over time from 31.4%, 54.1% and 63.5%, to 4.4%, 13.9% and 23.6%, respectively. Conclusions: The Romanian National program for liver transplantation addresses all causes of acute and chronic liver failure or liver tumors in adults and children, using all surgical techniques, with good long-term outcome. The program constantly evolved over time, leading to decreased mortality rate on the waiting list., (Celsius.)

Introduction: In synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLMs), simultaneous resection (SR) of the primary tumor and liver metastases has not gained wide acceptance. Most authors prefer staged resections (SgR), especially in patients presenting rectal cancer or requiring major hepatectomy. Methods: Morbidity, mortality, survival rates and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups of patients (SR vs. SgR). A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with similar characteristics (e.g. rectal tumor, major hepatectomy, bilobar metastases, metastatic lymph nodes, preoperative chemotherapy). Results: Between 1995 and 2016, SR was performed in 234 patients, while 66 patients underwent SgR. Comparative morbidity (41% vs. 31.8%, respectively, p = 0.1997), mortality (3.8% vs. 3%, respectively, p = 1) and overall survival rates (85.8%, 51.3% and 30% vs. 87%, 49.6% and 22.5%, at 1-, 3- and 5-years, respectively, p = 0.386) were similar between the SR and SgR group. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients undergoing SR than SgR (15.11 ‚+- 8.60 vs. 19.42 ‚+- 7.36 days, respectively, p 0.0001). The characteristics of SR and SgR groups were similar, except the following parameters: rectal tumor (34.1% vs. 19.7%, respectively, p = 0.0245), metastatic lymph nodes (68.1% vs. 86.3%, respectively, p = 0.0383), bilobar liver metastases (22.6% vs. 37.8%, respectively, p = 0.0169), major hepatectomies (13.2% vs. 30.3%, respectively, p= 0.0025) and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (13.2% vs. 77.2%, respectively, p 0.0001). A comparative analysis of morbidity, mortality and survival rates between SR and SgR was performed for subgroups of patients presenting these parameters. In each of these subgroups, SR was associated with similar morbidity, mortality and survival rates compared with SgR (p value 0.05)., Conclusion: In patients with SCLMs, SR provides similar short-term and long-term outcomes as SgR, with a shorter hospital stay. Therefore, in most patients with SCLMs, SR might be considered the treatment of choice., (Celsius.)

Background: Liver resection (LR) is the treatment of choice for most benign and malignant focal liver lesions, as well as in selected patients with liver trauma. Few other therapies can compete with LR in selected cases, such as liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and ablative therapies in small HCCs or liver metastases. The present paper analyses a single center experience in LR, reviewing the indications of LR, the operative techniques and their short-term results., Material and Method: Between January 2000 and December 2016, in "œDan Setlacec" Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation were performed 3165 LRs in 3016 patients, for pathologic conditions of the liver. In the present series, liver resections for living-donor liver transplantation were excluded. The median age of the patients was 56 years (mean 58 years; range 1-88), with male/female ratio 1524/1492 and adult/pediatric patient ratio 2973/43. Results: Malignant lesions were the main indication for LR (2372 LRs; 74.9%). Among these, colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent indication (952 LRs; 30.1%), followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (575 patients, 18.2%). The highest number of resected tumors per patient was 21, and the median diameter of the largest tumor was 40 mm (mean 51 mm; range 3-250). Major resections rate was 18.6% (588 LRs) and anatomical LRs were performed in 789 patients (24.9%). The median operative time was 180 minutes (mean 204 minutes; range 45-920). The median blood loss was 500 ml (mean 850 ml; range 500-9500), with a transfusion rate of 41.6% (1316 LRs). The morbidity rate was 40.1% (1270 LRs) and the rate of major complications (Dindo-Clavien IIIa or more) was 13.2% (418 LRs). Mortality rate was 4.2% (127 pts)., Conclusion: LRs should be performed in specialized high-volume centers to achieve the best results (low morbidity and mortality rates)., (Celsius.)