Search

• Assessment of the performance of WRF-Solar model in 3 AWS in Ghana. • WRF-Solar model performs better in clear skies, uncertainties arise under cloudy conditions. • Poor performance of WRF-Solar under high aerosol levels. • Notable Biases in CFC Predictions from the WRF-Solar model. • WRF-Solar outperforms in predicting 72-hour GHI at Kologo under clear skies. Accurate global horizontal irradiance (GHI) forecasting is critical for integrating solar energy into the power grid and operating solar power plants. The Weather Research and Forecasting model with its solar radiation extension (WRF-Solar) has been used to forecast solar irradiance in different regions around the world. However, the application of the WRF-Solar model to the prediction of GHI in West Africa, particularly Ghana, has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of the WRF-Solar model for predicting GHI in Ghana, focusing on three automatic weather stations (Akwatia, Kumasi and Kologo) for the year 2021. We used two one-way nested domains (D1 = 15 km and D2 = 3 km) to investigate the ability of the fully coupled WRF-Solar model to forecast GHI up to 72-hour ahead under different atmospheric conditions. The initial and lateral boundary conditions were taken from the ECMWF high-resolution operational forecasts. Our findings reveal that the WRF-Solar model performs better under clear skies than cloudy skies. Under clear skies, Kologo performed best in predicting 72-hour GHI, with a first day nRMSE of 9.62 %. However, forecasting GHI under cloudy skies at all three sites had significant uncertainties. Additionally, WRF-Solar model is able to reproduce the observed GHI diurnal cycle under high AOD conditions in most of the selected days. This study enhances the understanding of the WRF-Solar model's capabilities and limitations for GHI forecasting in West Africa, particularly in Ghana. The findings provide valuable information for stakeholders involved in solar energy generation and grid integration towards optimized management in the region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estimates of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) from reanalysis and satellite-based data are the most important information for the design and monitoring of PV systems in Africa, but their quality is unknown due to the lack of in situ measurements. In this study, we evaluate the performance of hourly GHI from state-of-the-art reanalysis and satellite-based products (ERA5, MERRA-2, CAMS, and SARAH-2) with 37 quality-controlled in situ measurements from novel meteorological networks established in Burkina Faso and Ghana under different weather conditions for the year 2020. The effects of clouds and aerosols are also considered in the analysis by using common performance measures for the main quality attributes and a new overall performance value for the joint assessment. The results show that satellite data performs better than reanalysis data under different atmospheric conditions. Nevertheless, both data sources exhibit significant bias of more than 150 W/m2 in terms of RMSE under cloudy skies compared to clear skies. The new measure of overall performance clearly shows that the hourly GHI derived from CAMS and SARAH-2 could serve as viable alternative data for assessing solar energy in the different climatic zones of West Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Savannahs are highly dynamic ecosystems but many of their properties and the related balances of energy, carbon, nitrogen, and water are still poorly understood. A particular scientific issue is the quantification of trace gases emitted from the soil of savannah ecosystems and their interaction with regional and global climate and air chemistry. Therefore it is important to develop and evaluate land-surface models that on the one hand represent vegetation and soil dynamics and on the other hand provide energy and water fluxes in a temporal resolution suitable for the application in climate/air chemistry models. In this paper, we present a consistent coupling between a common land-surface model (OSU) and a widely used biogeochemical model (DNDC) that is a first step for a full coupling of climate/air chemistry and biogeochemical processes. For consistency reasons, both models are linked to a general physiologically based plant model to provide the physical boundary conditions as well as the carbon and nitrogen in- and output variables. Evaluation is carried out with measurements of soil temperature, latent heat flux, soil water content, and soil emission data from two vegetation periods collected at a natural grassland site in Bontioli Nature Reserve, Burkina Faso (Africa). The results demonstrate that simulations of biogeochemical processes based on soil environmental conditions, calculated either with the land-surface model or with the unchanged biogeochemical model, do not differ significantly from each other. The OSU model simulates more realistic day-to-day variation of soil temperature as DNDC but the sensitivity of the biogeochemical simulation to this variation is small. In contrast, the sensitivity to differences in soil water content is high, but simulation results of both models are very similar on the daily scale and hardly depend on spatial soil resolution. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Bias correction (BC) methods can better represent the spatial patterns of the climate and derived agricultural impacts. • Uncertainties from BC can be twice as high compared to the uncertainties from the GCM-RCM combinations. • Climate change impacts studies (CCIS) without BC or relying on any single BC approach should be interpreted with great caution. • In CCIS, a BC ensemble is suggested for generating climate projections following a super-ensemble probabilistic assessment. Many open questions and unresolved issues surround the topic of bias correction (BC) in climate change impact studies (CCIS). One question relates to the contribution of downscaling of climate change scenarios on the uncertainties in results obtained using impact models for agriculture. In particular, for large area or regional agricultural impact assessments, the question of bias correction is of high relevance. Relatively few studies exist looking at the quantification of the impacts of BC methods in general circulation model (GCM) and regional climate model (RCM) data on results of such impact studies. Here, we quantify the impact of different BC methods on temperature (T) and precipitation (P) from different CORDEX GCM-RCM combinations, and how the debiased T&P signal may propagate through agricultural impact models. Specifically, we estimate the impact of BC on (i) an empirical P- and fuzzy rule-based algorithm to estimate the crop planting date, and (ii) a mechanistic T&P-based approach to quantify the crop suitability index (CSI) for the main staple crops in West Africa (i.e. groundnut, maize, pearl millet, sorghum). Both approaches serve as a proxy for more complex process-based ecophysiological crop models. Depending on the choice of the BC method, the uncertainties in the assessment of the CSI can be more than twice as high compared to the uncertainties from the GCM-RCM model selection. Comparing the estimated CSI values with observed harvest area, it is found that BC generally improves the performance for models with low hit rates (< 30 –35%), but decreases the performance for models with relatively high hit rates (> 35 %). Such consequences can also be expected for process-based crop models, which are developed to operate on field-scale but are driven by coarser scale RCMs. It is concluded that such agriculturally oriented climate impact models as investigated here should be interpreted with great caution if applied without BC or relying on a single BC approach only. Rather, we suggest to include different BC approaches in the generation of climate projections for CCIS and quantify their uncertainties following a super-ensemble probabilistic assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]