Search

Exact small sample behavior in two-way contingency tables is investigated for Pearson's chi-square statistic (X²), Light and Margolin's C statistic and its related R² measure of association, Kuliback's minimum discrimination information statistic (2&lcirc;), and Goodman and Kruskal's Lambda. R² is shown to be identical to Goodman and Kruskal's tb, leading to a test for independence based on 4. In small samples from a product of multinomials model, the null distribution of C is better approximated by a x² distribution than is the null distribution of X²; both are considerably better approximated by a x² distribution than is the null distribution of 2&lcirc;. It is proved for tables with two columns and any number of rows that if the column totals are equal, then X² ≤ 2&lcirc;; thus, X² is more conservative than 2&lcirc;. Hence, use of 2&lcirc; should be avoided in testing independence in tables with small samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper deals with certain aspects of variance component estimation for the unbalanced one-way random classification where the number (N[sub I]) of observations in the ith class is treated as a random variable not necessarily independent of the class effect (A[sub iota]). It is assumed that in general P(N[sub I] = 0) > 0. The conditional expectations (given the number of observations in each class) of all estimators of the between variance component (sigma[sup 2, sub alpha]) belonging to a certain class of estimators are derived. A general expression is found for the expected value of that estimator of sigma[sup 2, sub alpha] yielded by analysis of variance of class means. The limit of this expression (as the number of classes arrow right Infinity) is given; and it is shown that, if the bivariate distribution function of A[sub I], N[sub I] belongs to a certain class of distribution functions, then this limit is less than sigma[sup 2, sub a]. Numerical approximations to the expected values of two estimators of sigma[sup 2, sub a] are presented for one subclass of such distribution functions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The experiments to be discussed in this article was designed to investigate empirically the distribution of the sample version of the measure of association (G), &b.gamma;. Professors, William H. Kruskal and Leo A. Goodman have published an article giving interpretive motivation for the coefficient, and have developed the large sample theory for G. In the present research, sampling experiments were performed to test the adequacy of the large sample theory for 5X5 population cross classifications and samples of size ten, twenty-five and fifty. The numerical experiment described in this paper was based on a number of 25 cells multinomial populations, each considered as represented by the probabilities in a 5X5 population cross classification. Gamma is defined by Goodman and Kruskal in terms of probabilities. The 100 population cross classifications were chosen to be representative of practical situations in psychology. The method use to obtain them was to begin with 5X5 cross classification having complete association along the main diagonal and with a variety of marginal distributions.

The article presents information about two alternate formulas for determining the significance of the difference between a certain two correlation coefficients. These coefficients, r13 and r23, denote the correlation of two predictor variables with a predictand within a single sample drawn from a population. A restrictive assumption made in the derivation of statistician Harold Hotelling's formula is that the sets of values associated with the predictor variables must be fixed for all possible samples. In contrast, the restrictive assumption underlying the formula derived by statistician Ingram Olkin is that the three variables have a trivariate normal distribution. However, the sets of values associated with each variable are not fixed. Thus, the results obtained by this procedure can be generalized from the sample to the population from which it was drawn.