The divisions of subject matter and the schedules of counts in sociology present a hodge-podge when a comparison is made between the catalog announcements of different universities. At least this assertion is true if nine leading universities, the announcements of which have been analyzed, afford a fair picture of the situation. No unity exists in organization of the departments, in the courses taught, and in the subjects emphasized; the schemes followed seem to reflect the personal likes of the man in charge, a certain necessity for making something practical or particular conditions through which the school has evolved. The deplorableness of the whole situation is that it reflects the lack of science as applied to the field, the application of personal ambitions and interests which have played a dominating part in the upbuilding of departments, and the impossibility for a discriminating student knowing when he is studying sociology. No unity maintains in the groups of subjects which are listed. On the whole, the subjects seem to fall into groups which are as follows: General Sociology, Anthropology, Social Origins, Social Organization, Social Theory, Social Service, Statistics, Community Organization, Social Problems, Social Psychology, Demography, Research, and Miscellaneous. The last is added because certain courses did not fall under any of the first twelve headings or others that might have been devised. In one institution Anthropology and Social Problems constitute the only two groupings, excepting one course in General Sociology; here there is a department of Anthropology, one of Social Ethics.