Search

• The upper and lower surfaces of the deck are the vibration-induced parts. • The phase raise of lift leads to unsteady galloping instability. • Barriers' porosity or height change aerostability while their processes differ. • Mechanical damping is not a decisive parameter affecting critical wind speed. The long-span bridges with truss beam are widely recognized as typical wind-sensitive structures, and its wind-induced divergence events may become a very predominant issue. This work evaluates the galloping performance of a typical truss beam with wind barriers, which is detected to be susceptible to the infrequent vertical instability at specific attack angles, as evidenced by experimentation and numerical analysis. Since the truss beam constitutes a complex cross section, this study employs energy analysis to distinguish the crucial parts affected by vibration and discovers that the galloping vibration is mostly caused by the surfaces of the deck. Rather than relying on conventional quasi-steady theory, this study explores the unsteady aerodynamic forces to identify the underlying galloping driving mechanism. Our findings reveal that the instigator of galloping instability is the phase rising of lift with increasing wind speed. Additionally, the nonlinear mechanical damping is not a decisive parameter. Furthermore, we have investigated the impact of an essential ancillary facility, the wind barrier, and discovered that its galloping stability can be enhanced by increasing its porousness and decreasing its height. However, the underlying mechanisms behind this improvement are distinct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]