Search

This paper deals with methods aimed at the effective and efficient detection of accidental and/or intentional contaminant intrusion(s) in water distribution systems. The objective of this paper is to present a methodology entitled sensors local optimal transformation system (SLOTS) to address both single-objective and multiobjective sensor layout problems. SLOTS is tested on two benchmark water distribution networks used for the Battle of the Water Sensors Networks challenge (BWSN), held as part of the Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium, in Cincinnati in 2006. The objectives considered are detection likelihood and the expected population affected prior to detection. The results obtained demonstrate that SLOTS sensor placements are often near optimal. For both single-objective and multiobjective cases, SLOTS is shown to be capable of identifying placements which are consistently better performing than one of the best BWSN methodologies, the greedy algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The suitability of genetic algorithms (GAs) for the optimization of water distribution systems (WDSs) has been demonstrated extensively. However, despite many years of application in many different fields, the selection of the GA parameters remains a difficult and time consuming task. In this paper, two methodologies that do not require trial-and-error GA parameter calibration have been tested on a WDS optimization problem to determine their suitability for application in the water resources field and to assess their ability in locating near-optimal solutions. The results indicate that both approaches located solutions that were significantly better than a GA using typical parameter values, while the methodology based on convergence of the GA population located the best solutions overall. This method can be easily applied to assist GA users in identifying suitable GA parameters without requiring a time consuming trial-and-error approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, a number of evolutionary algorithms have been proposed for optimizing the design and operation of water distribution systems (WDSs). These evolutionary algorithms include genetic algorithms, ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization, the shuffled leaping frog algorithm, and differential evolution. Although there have been some comparisons made of the performance of the various algorithms, very few of these comparisons have been carried out in a completely rigorous manner. The main aim of this paper is to introduce a methodology for the rigorous comparison of various algorithms for the optimum design of water distribution systems. The methodology involves comparing the various algorithms in terms of (1) the best solution obtained; (2) the speed of convergence; and (3) the spread and consistency of the solutions obtained over a number of random starting seeds and numbers of evaluations. As a demonstration of the methodology, the techniques of genetic algorithms (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and differential evolution (DE) are applied to two frequently used WDS case studies, namely the New York Tunnels and Hanoi water networks. In addition, the techniques are applied to a real-size water distribution system consisting of 476 pipes. The results obtained show that the algorithm performances depend on the specific problem and the number of function evaluations allowed. Moreover, it is shown that correct calibration is an essential phase for a fair comparison of evolutionary algorithms. In fact, the best parameters are a function of the problem characteristics, of the objective function and of the variants in the algorithm operators. Therefore the adoption of configurations tested on slightly different versions of the algorithms can lead to quite different results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]