Search

Highlights: [•] This paper examines the impacts of rain gauge densities on runoff simulations. [•] Variation of rain gauge densities impacts the areal mean rainfall considerably. [•] The locations of rain gauges impact the model performances considerably. [•] Great impacts on model performances occurring when rain gauges fall below 0.4 station per 1000km2. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Predicting hydrological variables in ungauged catchments has been singled out as one of the major issues in the hydrological sciences. In this study, the conceptual rainfall-runoff model, HBV, was applied to Dongjiang basin and its 13 sub-basins for the purposes of examining the applicability of this well-known model in south China and exploring the possibility of transferring the calibrated parameter values to ungauged basins. For testing the applicability of the model in gauged basins, the model was calibrated for a period of 1978–1983 and validated for a period of 1984–1988. For testing the transferability of parameter values to ungauged basins, two parameter regionalization methods – proxy-basins and global mean – were investigated. The results showed that: 1) the HBV model worked well in the Dongjiang basin with the average indexes of agreement (D) and coefficient of efficiency (ME), respectively, equal to 0.79 and 0.82 in the calibration period, and 0.76 and 0.78 in the validation period; 2) transferring the parameter values from basins that passed the cross-basin test with higher ME values to the hypothetical ungauged catchments produced acceptable results with an average ME value equals to 0.72; 3) compared with the proxy-basin method of parameter estimation, the model produced equally good results for the global mean method with an average ME value equals to 0.74 when using simple arithmetic mean values. Neither the area weighted mean method nor the Thiessen polygon method produced regional parameter values could markedly improve the accuracy of modeling results. It was concluded that both regionalization methods could effectively estimate parameters for ungauged catchments in the Dongjiang basin, and similar model performances were obtained. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Spatial rainfall is a key input to distributed hydrological models, and its precisions heavily affect the accuracy of stream flow predictions from a hydrological model. Traditional interpolation techniques which obtain the spatial rainfall distribution from rain gauge data have some limitations caused by data scarcity and bad quality, especially in developing countries or remote locations. Satellite-based precipitation products are expected to offer an alternative to ground-based rainfall estimates in the present and the foreseeable future. For this purpose, the quality and usefulness of satellite-based precipitation products need to be evaluated. The present study compares the difference of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) rainfall with rain gauges data at different time scales and evaluates the usefulness of the TRMM rainfall for hydrological processes simulation and water balance analysis at the Xinjiang catchment, located in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China. The results show at daily time step TRMM rainfall data are better at determining rain occurrence and mean values than at determining the rainfall extremes, and larger difference exists for the maximal daily and maximal 5-day rainfalls. At monthly time scale, good linear relationships between TRMM rainfall and rain gauges rainfall data are received with the determination coefficients (R 2) varying between 0.81 and 0.89 for the individual stations and 0.88 for areal average rainfall data, respectively. But the slope of regression line ranges between 0.74 for Yingtan and 0.94 for Yushan, indicating that the TRMM satellite is inclined to underestimate the monthly rainfall in this area. The simulation of daily hydrological processes shows that the Water Flow Model for Lake Catchment (WATLAC) model using conventional rain gauge data produces an overall good fit, but the simulation results using TRMM rainfall data are discontented. The evaluation results imply that the TRMM rainfall data are unsuited for daily stream flow simulation in this study area with desired precisions. However, good performance can be received using TRMM rainfall data for monthly stream flow simulations. The comparison of the simulated annual water balance components shows that the different rainfall data sources can change the volume value and proportion of water balance components to some extent, but it generally meets the need of practical use. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Hydrological impact assessments are increasingly performed at fine spatial and temporal resolutions in order to resolve local-scale changes under a future climate. Apart from the uncertainty represented by different climate models, emission scenarios and post-processing methods, the local-scale internal variability of the climate can be a major source of uncertainty for hydrological projections. To assess the latter at the catchment scale, this paper presents a methodology which is particularly suitable for spatially distributed hydrological models. An ensemble of daily precipitation and daily mean temperature realizations on a high-resolution grid is simulated from stochastic weather generators (WGs) trained on historical data and equipped with climate change information obtained from a regional climate model. Based on the resulting simulated daily runoff data, the significance of changes in the runoff regime is assessed using a statistical hypothesis test, and the variability contributed by the two input variables is quantified using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). As a proof of concept, simulations on a 1-km grid over a period of 19 years are carried out for nine catchments in central Norway. Significant changes in runoff regimes are found, indicating that the trends introduced in the WGs are not overwhelmed by the local-scale internal variability. Variability in the runoff simulations varies substantially throughout the year; it is highest in periods with potential snowmelt and lowest during winter. Temperature is the dominant source of variability in the colder months (November–March) due to its influence on rainfall and snowmelt. High variability in May–June is contributed comparably by both temperature and precipitation. In summer and early autumn the runoff variability is precipitation dominated. The results are in line with findings in the literature where the runoff variability is driven by the large-scale internal climate variability. This indicates that ignoring the local-scale internal variability may yield an underestimation of the overall variability in runoff projections and projected changes. • Gridded climate input data simulated using stochastic weather generators. • Significance of changes in runoff regime assessed using a statistical test. • Runoff variability due to input variables quantified using ANOVA. • Results in line with findings based on large-scale internal climate variability. • Runoff projections need to consider local-scale internal variability of climate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]