Search

The role of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease has been questioned by the results of the FREEDOM trial, which showed superiority of coronary artery bypass graft(CABG) over first generation drug-eluting stents (DES) including a reduction in mortality. In the light of safer and more efficacious stents and significantly better medical management, those results that date back to 2012 need to be revisited. TUXEDO-2 is a study designed to compare two contemporary stents in Indian diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. The primary objective of the TUXEDO-2 study is to compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz vs Xience when combined with contemporary optimal medical therapy (OMT) in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. The secondary objective is to compare clinical outcomes between a pooled cohort from both arms of the study (Supraflex Cruz + Xience; PCI arm) vs CABG based on a performance goal derived from the CABG arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical cohort). The tertiary objective is a randomized comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin for the composite of ischemic and bleeding events. In this prospective, open-label, multi-centre, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, controlled study, 1,800 patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease (inclusion criteria similar to FREEDOM trial) with indication for coronary revascularization will be randomly assigned to Supraflex Cruz or Xience stents and also to ticagrelor- or prasugrel- based antiplatelet strategies. All patients will receive guideline directed OMT and optimal PCI including image- and physiology-guided complete revascularization where feasible. The patients will be followed through five years to assess their clinical status and major clinical events. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of target lesion failure at one-year for Supraflex Cruz vs Xience (primary objective) with an expected event rate of 11% and a non-inferiority margin of 4.5%. For PCI vs CABG (secondary objective), the primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke at one-year and yearly up to five years, with a performance goal of 21.6%. For ticagrelor vs prasugrel (tertiary objective), the primary endpoint is composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding as per the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) at one-year with expected event rate of 15% and a non-inferiority margin of 5%. The TUXEDO-2 study is a contemporary study involving state-of-the-art PCI combined with guideline directed OMT in a complex subset of patients with diabetes mellitus and multi-vessel disease. The trial will answer the question as to whether a biodegradable polymer coated ultra-thin Supraflex Cruz stent is an attractive option for PCI in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease. It will also help address the question whether the results of FREEDOM trial would have been different in the current era of safer and more efficacious stents and modern medical therapy. In addition, the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in addition to aspirin will be evaluated. (CTRI/2019/11/022088) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catalytic iron (CI) mediates vascular injury by generating reactive oxygen species. We evaluated role of CI in predicting mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and studied association of contrast nephropathy with CI levels. Methods: We investigated 806 patients with ACS undergoing contrast exposure for a cardiac procedure who were followed up for 30 days. Results: Overall mortality was 1.6% at 30 days. Catalytic iron at baseline predicted mortality with CI levels significantly higher in those who died, 0.45 μmol/L (0.37, 0.68) compared with survivors 0.31 μmol/L (0.21, 0.40); P = .004. Catalytic iron was associated with increased risk of death in the highest quartile compared with lower 3 quartiles (hazard ratio 7.88, P = .001) after adjustment for age, diabetes, ST deviation, Killip class, ejection fraction, baseline creatinine, hemoglobin level, and troponin. Fifty-five patients (6.8%) developed contrast nephropathy. Patients with contrast nephropathy had a 27% increase in median CI levels from baseline up to 48 hours compared with a marginal 2.9% increase in those without contrast nephropathy (0.37, 0.14 μmol/L to 0.47, 0.20 μmol/L versus 0.35, 0.12 μmol/L to 0.36, 0.14 μmol/L, P < .0001). Patients with contrast nephropathy had significantly higher mortality compared with those without contrast nephropathy (9.1% vs 1.1%, P = .001). Conclusion: High baseline CI levels predicted mortality in patients with ACS. Occurrence of contrast nephropathy was associated with rise in CI levels and higher mortality. Therapeutic options to buffer or chelate CI may have beneficial effects on mortality in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]