Search

To present an approach to involving people with communication disorders in research. Background Patient and public involvement (PPI) is promoted at all stages of research, with everyone having a right to be involved. However, the high level of communication skills often required precludes the involvement of people with communication disorders. As people from several healthcare groups have communication difficulties, it is important to establish approaches that can help to involve them. Data source A study involving people with communication difficulties using computerised aphasia treatment. Review methods The paper describes techniques used to help an advisory group comprising people with aphasia and their carers to collaborate. Reflections on participating in a research group were elicited through videoed interviews. A thematic analysis of the video transcripts identified issues important to the group's members. Discussion The approach to patient and public involvement in research enabled collaboration with people with aphasia at all stages of research, including contributing to recruitment, refinement of protocols, new research methods and dissemination of project outcomes. Allowing time for careful preparation of group meetings, facilitation techniques and activities is crucial to achieve this level of involvement. Conclusion The group experienced increased confidence in communicating, stimulation and feelings of empowerment and being able to influence the future treatment of people with aphasia. Implications for practice/research People with communication difficulties need not be excluded from PPI activities designed to inform clinical practice or health research. Inclusion of this group can be made possible by using creative methods of exchanging ideas, reducing reliance on rapid, complex spoken interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To explore the attitudes that doctoral students share with each other in an online postgraduate discussion forum. Background: The supervisory role is pivotal to the successful completion of a PhD. Student satisfaction surveys are implemented by some universities, but there is currently no research that has investigated PhD students’ experiences of supervision in the less formal environment of an online postgraduate discussion forum. Data sources: Data were collected between September and December 2012 from the Postgraduate Forum, which receives posts from the global student community. The keywords used in the search were ‘supervisor(s)’ and ‘supervision’. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. Review methods: All relevant titles and posts from between January 2002 and the end of December 2012 were searched. Discussion: The authors discovered five major themes: communication difficulties, control and engagement, academic bullying, lack of trust, and desertion. The relationship between students and supervisors is vital to successful PhD completion, and this study has provided some of the experiences students share with each other in an online postgraduate discussion forum. Conclusions: The online discussion forum provided an insight into students’ perspectives of supervision but as it is asynchronous, there is limited analysis. Further research incorporating synchronous data collection methods would be helpful to examine students’ experiences in greater detail. Implications for research/practice: This study shows how an online postgraduate forum can be used as a source of data to gain an insight into PhD students’ perspectives of supervision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]