Search

The U.S. health care system is one of the world's most advanced systems. Yet, the health care system suffers from unexplained practice variations, major gaps between evidence and practice, and suboptimal quality. Although information processing, communication, and management are key to health care delivery and considerable evidence links information/communication technology (IT) to improvements in patient safety and quality of care, the health care system has a longstanding gap in its investment. In the Crossing the Quality Chasm and Building a Better Delivery System reports, The Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Engineering identified IT integration as critical to improving health care delivery systems. This paper reviews the state of IT use in the U.S. health care system, its role in facilitating evidence-based practices, and identifies key attributes of an ideal IT infrastructure and issues surrounding IT implementation. We also examine structural, financial, policy-related, cultural, and organizational barriers to IT implementation for evidence-based practice and strategies to overcome them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally in medicine, nearly all prescribing decisions were made by the treating physician. The patient had relatively little input and hardly any access to alternative sources of information bearing on that decision; the cost of the prescription was covered by the patient or by an insurer, and neither was likely to provide any feedback to the physician to shape his or her decision. Now, all that has changed. Beginning with the consumerist movement of recent decades and culminating in the explosion of health-related information on the Internet, patients are increasingly vocal participants in the prescribing decision, on both clinical and economic grounds. Payers have become participants as well, and increasingly seek to influence prescribing decisions in the light of their own economic imperatives. Added to all these cross-currents is an additional wild card: the proliferation of ‘alternative medicines,’ ‘nutraceuticals’ and other nostrums that society has placed beyond the reach of the evidence-based discourse and regulations that govern conventional drug therapy. In a country where patients struggle to cover the cost of prescription therapies proven both safe and effective in rigorous clinical trials, billions of dollars per year are spent on alternative treatments in the US, unencumbered by concerns about whether they actually work or that they might be toxic. While these patterns of communication, education, disinformation and economic influence are much more chaotic than those that prevailed in the ‘good old days,’ this very ferment may also present opportunities for improvement of rational pharmacotherapy and public health. This paper briefly outlines the above changes in patterns of communication and influence as they relate to medication use in today's industrialised world (particularly the US), and suggests both hopeful and terrifying scenarios describing where these trends might lead in the coming decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reflects on the condition of the health care system in the U.S. It is indicated that most patients have not been satisfied with the present medical care. In a similar case, health care professionals are also disgruntled with the intrusive regulatory system. Moreover, a bad financial condition has been evident among health care delivery organizations.

The population in the United States is increasingly multicultural. So, too, is the U.S. physician workforce. The combination of these diversity dynamics sets up the potential for various types of cultural conflict in the nation's examining rooms, including the relationship between religion and medicine. To address the changing patient-physician landscape, we argue for a broad scale intervention: interdisciplinary bioethics training for physicians and other health professionals. This approach seeks to promote a common procedural expectation and language which can lead to an improved, patient-centered approach resulting in better patient-physician relationships that contribute to better health outcomes across the U.S. population. The authors illustrate their thesis and solution using a well-known case of cross-cultural dynamics taken from religion and medicine-Anne Fadiman's The Spirit Catches You And You Fall Down. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) have been a valuable resource for the United States physician workforce, and their contribution to the United States workforce is likely to increase. OBJECTIVE: To describe the historical trends and compare the characteristics of IMGs to United States medical graduates (USMGs) in the United States. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of the American Medical Association Physicians' Professional Data (AMA-PPD) database using the 1978-2004 files and a comparative analysis of the characteristics of a random sample of 1,000 IMGs and a random sample of 1,000 USMGs using the 2004 file. MEASUREMENTS: Historical trends and characteristics of IMGs in the United States. RESULTS: Over the last 26 years, the number of IMGs in the United States grew by 4,873 per year reaching a total of 215,576 in 2004, about 2.4 times its size in 1978. The proportion of IMGs increased 0.12% per year, from 22.2% in 1978 to 25.6% in 2004. In 2004, compared with USMGs, IMGs were older, less likely to be board certified [Odds ratio (OR), 0.68: 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86], less likely to work in group practice (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98), more likely to have Internal Medicine as practice specialty (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.71) and more likely to be residents (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.16). CONCLUSIONS: Over the last quarter century. the IMGs provided a significant and steady supply for the United States physician workforce that continues to grow. Policymakers should consider the consequences for both the United States and source countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Few curricula train medical students to engage in health system reform.Aim: To develop physician activists by teaching medical students the skills necessary to advocate for socially equitable health policies in the U.S. health system.Setting: Montefiore Medical Center, the University Hospital of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.Program Description: We designed a 1-month curriculum in research-based health activism to develop physician activists. The annual curriculum includes a student project and 4 course sections;health policy, research methods, advocacy, and physician activists as role models; taught by core faculty and volunteers from academic institutions, government, and nongovernmental organizations.Program Evaluation: From 2002 to 2005, 47 students from across the country have participated. Students reported improved capabilities to generate a research question, design a research proposal,and create an advocacy plan.Discussion: Our curriculum demonstrates a model for training physician activists to engage in health systems reform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The persistence of a large quality gap between what we know about how to produce high quality clinical care and what the public receives has prompted interest in developing more effective methods to get evidence into practice. Implementation research aims to supply such methods.Purpose: This article proposes a set of recommendations aimed at establishing a common understanding of what implementation research is, and how to foster its development.Methods: We developed the recommendations in the context of a translation research conference hosted by the VA for VA and non-VA health services researchers.Impacts: Health care organizations, journals, researchers and academic institutions can use these recommendations to advance the field of implementation science and thus increase the impact of clinical and health services research on the health and health care of the public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]