Search

Different catalogues of earthquakes are available for the Indian region besides regional catalogues for the Gujarat region. The limitations of these and other historical catalogues have been discussed in this paper for earthquake hazards and other studies. Keeping in view that these historical catalogues have been successful in explaining the recent occurrence of a few earthquakes like Coimbatore (1900), Hyderabad (1983), Bangaluru (1985) and Jabalpur (1997), the study has been extended to the Gujarat region. In this paper, therefore, an attempt has been made to correlate the historical data of the felt earthquakes in the Gujarat region from all the available sources with instrumental data to examine the recurrence of the earthquakes. It has been found that in addition to the seismically active Kutch region and Narmada and Cambay rifts, there is a tendency for earthquakes to recur in many districts of Gujarat for which felt data from historical times is available. The seismicity map prepared by the Institute of Seismological Research (ISR), Gandhinagar based on the Seismic Telemetry (2006–2020) shows scattered seismicity over the whole of Gujarat region besides active seismicity in the Kutch region. This data when combined with that from the catalogue prepared by the National Centre of Seismology provides greater confidence for earthquake hazard studies It has also been found that the coastal regions of Saurashtra and south Gujarat are more prone to swarm types of earthquakes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports results of mathematical modeling applied to the stress and strain in epicentral zones before and after the large earthquakes that occurred on June 22, 2002 in the Qazvin Province, northwestern Iran (Mw = 6.4) and the Gujarat, India earthquake of January 26, 2001 (M = 6.9). The modeling relied on a method for calculating stress and strain in a blocky elastic isotropic heterogeneous medium disturbed by a set of faults that are due to an external tectonic stress field. The boundary conditions were specified based on geological and seismological data. It has been shown that the epicenters of large crustal earthquakes occur in zones of high stress concentration at the ends of tectonic faults. Rupture occurs when the relationship between acting tectonic stresses satisfies the requirement σyy/σxx >3, thus connecting zones of high stress. The evolution of the aftershock process is controlled by the stress drop caused by a new rupture, while the resulting aftershock clusters are in spatial correlation with the stress drop zone. The new rupture propagates in the direction of dominant tectonic fault orientation in the region. We show a relationship to exist between rupture length and the possible retrospectively predicted location and magnitude of the earthquake depending on the elastic energy buildup and its possible release under specified structural tectonic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]