Search

Please cite this paper as: Petukhova et al. (2011) B- and T-cell memory elicited by a seasonal live attenuated reassortant influenza vaccine: assessment of local antibody avidity and virus-specific memory T-cells using trogocytosis-based method. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00279.x. Purpose The main purpose of vaccination is to generate immunological memory providing enhanced immune responses against infectious pathogens. The standard and most commonly used assay for influenza vaccine immunogenicity evaluation is a hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI). It is clear now that HAI assay is unable to properly assess the proven protective immunity elicited by live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV). New methods need to be developed for more accurate LAIV immunogenicity assessment and prediction of vaccine efficacy among target populations. Objective Randomized placebo-controlled study of memory B- and T-cell responses to intranasal LAIV in young adults. Methods A total of 56 healthy young adults 18-20 years old received seasonal monovalent LAIV. Mucosal memory B-cell responses were measured by IgA avidity assessment in nasal swabs. CD4 memory T cells in peripheral blood were examined by the expression of CD45RO marker and in functional test by the ability of virus-specific T cells to maintain the trogocytosis with antigen-loaded target cells. Results Intranasal LAIV immunization enhances mucosal IgA avidity even without reliable increases in antibody titers. At the day 21 after vaccination, up to 40% of subjects demonstrated significant increases in both total and virus-specific CD4 memory T cells that were observed regardless of seroconversion rate measured by HAI assay. Conclusion The data suggest that immunogenicity of LAIV vaccines should be evaluated on the mucosal and cellular immunity basis. The assays applied could be used to support influenza clinical trials through preliminary screening of volunteers and subsequent measurement of anti-influenza in immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Asthmatics in particular have a need for influenza vaccines because influenza infection is a frequent cause of hospitalization of patients with bronchial asthma. Currently, only inactivated influenza vaccines are recommended for influenza prevention in asthma sufferers. Objective The aim of our study was to analyze and compare the effects of influenza infection and vaccination with live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) on different phases of experimental murine allergic bronchial asthma (acute asthma and remission phase) and on subsequent exposure to allergen in sensitized animals. Methods Ovalbumin (OVA)-specific serum IgE levels, IL-4 production by spleen and lung lymphocytes, and histological changes in the lungs of mice infected with pathogenic virus or LAIV were studied at two phases of OVA-induced bronchial asthma (acute asthma and remission). Results Infection with pathogenic virus both in acute asthma and remission led to asthma exacerbation associated with the production of OVA-specific IgE, IL-4 and significant inflammatory infiltration in airways. Infection, even after complete virus clearance, induced the aggravation of lung inflammation and IgE production in asthmatic mice additionally exposed to OVA. Immunization with LAIV at remission did not enhance allergic inflammatory changes in the lung, OVA-specific IgE or IL-4 production. Then after additional OVA exposure, histological and immunological changes in these mice were the same as in the control group. Conclusions Influenza infection provokes asthma exacerbation regardless of the disease phase. Immunization with LAIV during the remission phase of bronchial asthma is safe and does not interfere upon subsequent contact of asthma sufferers with allergen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]