Search

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is treatable by catheter ablation. Advances in mapping‐system technology permit fluoroless workflow during ablations. As national practice trends toward fluoroless approaches, easily obtained, reproducible methods of slow‐pathway identification, and ablation become increasingly important. We present a novel method of slow‐pathway identification and initial ablation results from this method. Methods and Results: We examined AVNRT ablations performed at our institution over a 12‐month period. In these cases, the site of the slow pathway was predicted by latest activation in the inferior triangle of Koch during sinus rhythm. Ablation was performed in this region. Proximity of the predicted site to the successful ablation location, complication rates, and patient outcomes were recorded. Junctional rhythm was seen in 40/41 ablations (98%) at the predicted site (mean, 1.3 lesions and median, 1 lesion per case). One lesion was defined as 5 mm of ablation. The initial ablation was successful in 39/41 cases (95%); in two cases, greater or equal to 2 echo beats were detected after the initial ablation, necessitating further lesion expansion. In 8/41 cases (20%), greater than one lesion was placed during initial ablation before attempted reinduction. Complications included one transient heart block and one transient PR prolongation. During follow‐up (median, day 51), one patient had lower‐extremity deep‐vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus, and one had a lower‐extremity superficial venous thrombosis. There was one tachycardia recurrence, which prompted a redo ablation. Conclusions: Mapping‐system detection of late‐activation, low‐amplitude voltage during sinus rhythm provides an objective, and fluoroless means of identifying the slow pathway in typical AVNRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The PROVE trial was designed to determine if antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is clinically beneficial for primary prevention in patients who have implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds). Background: Use of ICDs and CRT-Ds reduces mortality in patients with ventricular dysfunction and mild to moderate heart failure. However, in studies of the primary prevention population, shock-only ICDs are predominantly used, without ATP programming for less painful termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Methods: We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study using market-released ICDs and CRT-Ds. Patients received devices programmed to deliver ATP for VT cycle lengths of 270-330 ms. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The incidence of VT and the rate of successful termination by ATP were analyzed. Results: Of 830 patients in the study population (men, 73%; mean age, 67.3 ± 12 years), 32% received single-chamber ICDs, 44% dual-chamber ICDs, and 24% CRT-Ds. ATP was attempted for 112 VT episodes in 71 patients, and 103 (92%) of the VT episodes were successfully terminated. Three VT episodes were accelerated by ATP and required termination by ICD shock; 6 episodes terminated spontaneously or by ICD shock. Conclusions: VT is common in patients without a history of this arrhythmia who have received ICDs or CRT-Ds for primary prevention indications. Programming ICDs for ATP therapy at the time of implantation could potentially terminate most VT episodes and reduce the number of painful shocks for these patients. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1349-1354, December 2010) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Assessment of ventricular activation pattern is critical to the successful ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). We have previously shown that the global atrial activation pattern during tachycardia can be rapidly and accurately assessed by calculating the postpacing interval variability (PPIV); PPIV was minimal in circuitous tachycardias and highly variable in centrifugal tachycardias. In the present study, we use the PPIV to determine the ventricular global activation pattern during VT. Methods: Patients with mappable VT were included. We defined global ventricular activation as either centrifugal (arising from a focus with radial expansion) or circuitous (gross macro-reentrant circuit), based on the findings of electroanatomic mapping. PPIV was calculated as the difference in postpacing interval with right ventricular apical overdrive pacing during tachycardia at cycle lengths (CL) 10 ms and 30-ms shorter than tachycardia, regardless of the origin of the tachycardia. We studied 20 patients with 23 VTs (11 centrifugal, mean CL 390 ± 36.1 ms; 12 circuitous, mean CL 418 ± 75.7 ms). Results: The mean PPIV was 45 ± 16 ms for patients with centrifugal VT and 6.7 ± 4.1 ms for patients with circuitous VT. Rank sum analysis of PPIV showed a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the global ventricular activation pattern during VT can be rapidly and accurately defined by assessing the PPIV. This technique allows for a rapid confirmation of the tachycardia activation and significantly facilitates mapping and ablation. (PACE 2010; 33:129–134) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post-pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5-second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro-reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 ± 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 ± 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of ≤10 ms and ≥30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity. Conclusions: Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter (cycle length ≤230 msec) induced at electrophysiologic studies are thought to be nonspecific findings in patients presenting with syncope of unknown origin. However, there are limited data on the prognosis of these patients in long-term follow-up. Methods and Results: We followed 274 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease presenting with syncope or presyncope who underwent electrophysiologic studies from January 1992 to June 1999 and assessed the risk of subsequent arrhythmias stratified by the electrophysiologic result at the time of their presentation with syncope. Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 23 patients (8%); ventricular flutter in 24 (9%), sustained ventricular tachycardia in 41 (15%); and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia 42 (15%). In 37 ± 25 months of follow-up, there have been ventricular arrhythmias in 34 patients, including 3 (13%) of 23 who had induced ventricular fibrillation, and 7 (30%) of 24 with induced ventricular flutter, compared to 13 (32%) of 41 with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 7 (17%) of 42 with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and only 4 (3%) of 144 noninducible patients (P < 0.001 for induced ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter vs noninducible patients). The inducibility of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter were independent risk factors for arrhythmia occurrence in follow-up. Conclusion: Ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter induced at electrophysiologic studies have prognostic significance for arrhythmia occurrence in patients presenting with syncope. These induced arrhythmias may not be as nonspecific as previously thought and treatment should be considered for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]