Search

Purpose: This study investigated the characteristics of oxaliplatin-related hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) and evaluated the efficacy of premedication and desensitization administration for controlling HSR in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Methods: This retrospective study includes oxaliplatin hypersensitivity cases reported to our in-hospital, adverse drug reaction monitoring system between May 2008 and April 2012. We analyzed administration histories of oxaliplatin and premedication treatments, chemotherapy cycle and severity of the initial HSR, and prophylactic measures and their outcomes in subsequent chemotherapy cycles. Results: One hundred and seventy-three patients showed hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HSR developed after mean chemotherapy cycle 6.3 ± 0.3. Specifically, while HSR occurred at cycle 7.6 ± 0.3 in the case of patients previously unexposed to oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy, it occurred at cycle 2.6 ± 0.3 in previously exposed patients. Of the 173 patients who exhibited HSR, premedication was administered in 134 patients and 71.6 % of them succeeded in preventing HSR. Desensitization was attempted in 38 patients, including 20 patients in whom premedication administration was unsuccessful, and 89 % of desensitized patients successfully underwent oxaliplatin chemotherapy without HSR. As severity of HSR increased, the success rate by premedication decreased and the percentage of patients that underwent desensitization increased. Conclusions: Attention should be paid to patients with any prior exposure to oxaliplatin, especially during early chemotherapy cycles. Given the high success rate of preventing HSR by desensitization administration and its apparent safety profile, we suggest that desensitization be considered as the first option for the treatment of grades 3 and 4 HSR cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Although allopurinol is a very effective urate-lowering drug for complicated hyperuricemia, in some patients, it can induce severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Recent investigations suggest that HLA-B*5801 is a very strong marker for allopurinol-induced SCARs, especially in the population with a high frequency of HLA-B*5801. Korea is one of the countries with a high frequency of HLA-B*5801 which is the only subtype of HLA-B58 in the Korean population.Objective. This study was conducted to find out the incidence of allopurinol-induced hypersensitivity on patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) according to HLA-B58 and the clinical implications of HLA-B58 as a risk marker for the development of allopurinol-induced hypersensitivity.Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with CRI who took allopurinol and carried out serologic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing for kidney transplantation between January 2003 and May 2010.Results. Among a total of 448 patients with CRI, 16 (3.6%) patients experienced allopurinol hypersensitivity. Nine of these patients (2.0%) were diagnosed with SCARs (two Stevens–Johnson syndrome and seven allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome) and seven patients (1.6%) had simple maculopapular rashes. The HLA-B58 allele was present in all patients with allopurinol-induced SCARs, while the frequency of HLA-B58 was only 9.5% in allopurinol-tolerant patients (P < 0.05). The incidence of allopurinol-induced SCARs in CRI shows a wide disparity according to HLA-B58 [18% in HLA-B58 (+) versus 0% in HLA-B58 (−)]. Among patients without HLA-B58, most (98.2%) of the CRI patients were tolerant to allopurinol and only 1.8% experienced simple rashes after taking allopurinol.Conclusions. In this study, the incidence of allopurinol-induced SCARs was considerably high in CRI patients with HLA-B58. This finding indicates that the presence of HLA-B58 may increase the risk of allopurinol-induced SCARs. Screening tests for HLA-B58 in CRI patients will be clinically helpful in preventing severe allopurinol hypersensitivity reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: While hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to intravenously administered iodinated contrast media (ICM) have been well studied, not much is known about HSR to intra-arterially administered ICM.Methods: A prospective observational study was performed to evaluate coronary angiography (CAG)-induced ICM hypersensitivity in patients who underwent CAG using ICM including ioversol, a low-osmolar non-ionic monomer, and iodixanol, an iso-osmolar non-ionic dimer. The HSR were investigated through in-patient monitoring after CAG and telephone interview after discharge.Results: A total of 714 patients were enrolled during the observation period, of whom 26 (3.6%) showed immediate HSR and 108 (15.1%) showed delayed HSR. With regard to severity, proportion of immediate HSR grades 1, 2, and 3 was 57.7%, 38.5%, and 3.8%, respectively, whereas that of delayed HSR grades 1, 2, and 3 was 85.2%, 13.9%, and 0.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that previous intra-arterial exposure to ICM was an independent risk factor for immediate HSR (odds ratio (OR) 2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-6.96; p = 0.015). Iodixanol was a significant risk factor for delayed HSR (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.43; p = 0.024) and correlated with a higher incidence of delayed HSR within 24-h post-ICM administration compared to ioversol.Conclusion: The incidence rate of immediate and delayed HSR in intra-arterially administered ICM was 3.6% and 15.1%, respectively. Previous exposure to intra-arterially administered contrast media was a significant risk factor for immediate HSR. Compared to ioversol, iodixanol was associated with relatively earlier and more frequent delayed HSR.Key Points: • In this prospective study, the incidence of immediate and delayed hypersensitivity in intra-arterial injection of contrast media during coronary angiography was 3.6% and 15.1%, respectively. • Delayed hypersensitivity reactions were more common but less severe than immediate hypersensitivity reactions during coronary angiography. • Previous exposure to ICM via intra-arterial route was a significant risk factor for immediate hypersensitivity to intra-arterial contrast medium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]