Search

Background: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the rates of cognitive decline are variable according to underlying pathologies and biomarker status. We conducted an observational study and aimed to investigate baseline characteristics and biomarkers related with cognitive declines in SCD. Our study also assessed whether SCD participants showed different cognitive and biomarker trajectories according to baseline amyloid deposition. Methods: This study is a part of a longitudinal cohort study conducted in multi-centers in South Korea between 2018 and 2021. Individuals (≥ 60 years old) with persistent cognitive complaint despite of normal cognitive functions were eligible for the study. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests, florbetaben PET scans, plasma amyloid markers, and brain MRI scans. Annual follow-up evaluations included neuropsychological tests and assessments for clinical progressions. Regional brain volumetry and amyloid burden represented by PET-based standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) were measured. We compared cognitive and brain atrophic changes over 24 months between amyloid positive-SCD (Aβ + SCD) and amyloid negative-SCD (Aβ-SCD) groups. Baseline factors associated with cognitive outcomes were investigated. Results: A total of 120 participants with SCD were enrolled and 107 completed follow-up evaluations. Aβ + SCD participants (n = 20, 18.5%) were older and more frequently APOE4 carriers compared with Aβ-SCD participants (n = 87). Baseline cognitive scores were not different between the two groups, except the Seoul Verbal Learning Test (SVLT) scores showing lower scores in the Aβ + SCD group. After 24 months, plasma amyloid markers were higher, and regional volumes (entorhinal, hippocampal, and pallidum) were smaller in the Aβ + SCD participants compared with Aβ-SCD participants adjusted by age, sex, and baseline volumes. SVLT delayed recall and controlled oral word association test (COWAT) scores indicated more declines in Aβ + SCD participants. Baseline left entorhinal volumes were related to verbal memory decline, while baseline frontal volumes and global SUVR values were related to frontal functional decline. Conclusion: Aβ + SCD participants showed more cognitive decline and medial temporal atrophic changes during 24 months. Baseline neurodegeneration and amyloid burden were related with future cognitive trajectories in SCD. Trial registration: This study was registered at CRIS (KCT0003397). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a self-perceived cognitive worsening without objective cognitive impairment. Due to its heterogeneity and potential risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), baseline biomarkers to predict progression are clinically important. In the present study, cognitive trajectories during a 24-month period were compared between amyloid-positive SCD (A+SCD) and amyloid-negative SCD (A−SCD) subjects, and biomarkers associated with memory decline were investigated. Methods: Data from a prospective cohort study in Korea between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. SCD subjects ≥50 years of age were eligible. All participants underwent neuropsychological tests, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and florbetaben positron emission tomography scans. Amyloid burden and regional volumes were measured. Cognitive changes corrected for age were compared between A+SCD and A−SCD groups. Biomarkers associated with memory decline were assessed. Results: Forty-seven SCD subjects (69.9 ± 6.7 years, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score 27.5) were enrolled, and 31 completed at least 1 annual follow-up (mean follow-up: 24.7 months). Baseline characteristics except age, hippocampal atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities were similar between A+SCDs (n = 12, 25.6%) and A−SCDs (n = 35). A+SCD subjects showed greater decline in the verbal memory function compared with the A−SCD subjects after adjustment for age. MMSE scores decreased more in the A+SCD (1.1 in the A+SCD; 0.55 in the A−SCD), although it was not statistically significant. Amyloid burden and baseline memory score were associated with memory decline. Conclusions: Within SCD, A+SCD subjects showed faster memory decline compared with the A−SCD subjects and amyloid burden might be associated with future memory decline in SCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background& Objective: Depression frequently combines with dementia, including early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). We investigated differences in prevalence and characteristics of depressive symptoms according to dementia severity in EOAD patients.Methods: The 15-item Korean version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) was administered to 412 EOAD patients. Factor analysis was used to assess GDS-15 factor structure. We subdivided participants into three groups by disease severity, then compared the frequencies and scores of individual GDS-15 items and performed logistic regression analysis to assess associations between depressive symptoms and EOAD stage.Results: Factor analysis yielded three factor categories: 1) "hopelessness and ominousness" (symptoms no. 6, 8, 12, 14, 15); 2) "unhappiness and dissatisfaction" (no. 1, 3, 5, 7, 11); and 3) "monotony and lack of energy" (no. 2, 4, 9, 10, 13). Factor 2 depressive symptoms (no. 1, 5, 11) were less common in moderate EOAD. The risk of Factor 1 symptoms: no. 12 (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.19-3.50; p = 0.010) and 14 (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.07-3.16; p = 0.028) was higher in mild than very mild EOAD. The risk of Factor 2 symptoms: no. 9 (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.08-6.71; p = 0.033) and 13 (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02-4.40; p = 0.043) was higher in moderate than mild EOAD.Conclusion: We confirmed that depressive symptoms differ according to EOAD severity. When assessing depressive symptoms related to dementia progression, we recommend focusing on "hopelessness and ominousness" in very mild EOAD and "unhappiness and dissatisfaction" in mild EOAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: The aims of this study were to determine baseline factors related to the progression of subjective memory impairment (SMI) in elderly subjects and to develop a new modeling scale to predict progression. Methods: Elderly subjects with SMI were recruited from the nationwide Clinical Research Centers for Dementia of South Korea (CREDOS) multicenter cohort and divided into two groups: (1) progressed to mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease or (2) stable without progression. Baseline clinical characteristics were compared between the groups, and the most relevant predictors of progression were assessed. A new modeling scale combining the predictors was developed. Results: In total, 129 subjects with SMI were analyzed. The follow-up duration was 0.5-4.7 years, and the median time to event was 3.64 years. The progressing group (n = 29) differed from the stable group (n = 100) in terms of baseline age, apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) status, and some cognitive domains. Older age, a lower Mini-Mental State Examination recall score, APOE4 carrier, and a lower verbal delayed recall score were the most relevant predictors of progression, and a new modeling scale with these 4 predictors provided a better explanation of progression. Conclusion: SMI subjects with a higher risk of progression can be identified using a new modeling scale and might need further evaluations and more frequent follow-up. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]