Search

The development of high-speed railway networks and the increased running speeds of high-speed trains (HSTs) have made the aerodynamic interference between HSTs and their surrounding environments increasingly important. Compared with a traditional wind tunnel test, systematically understanding the aerodynamic characteristics of HSTs involves relatively more stringent requirements, highlighting the need to develop experimental methods and technologies with enhanced dynamic performance. Central South University (CSU) developed a wireless data acquisition system, named as the in-model sensory and wireless data acquisition — remote control and processing system (ISWDA-RCPS), which can operate onboard a novel moving train and infrastructure rig. The system was developed to meet current wind tunnel data collection needs, and it avoids the physical cables used in conventional devices, which are extremely susceptible to induced noise. The system accepts inputs from various sensors and transfers the data wirelessly to an access point outside a wind tunnel’s test section. To analyze the feasibility of the ISWDA-RCPS concerning its sensing capabilities and wireless communications, we conduct experiments in multiple operating conditions. Finally, pressure measurements are acquired from a moving Fuxing HST model at different points and used to analyze the aerodynamic behavior of the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A running train induces a slipstream around it, which is closely related to its aerodynamic features and crucial for the safety of people and structures near the track. However, the effect of crosswinds is almost inevitable when the train runs on a bridge. In this work, an experimental study using moving model testing technology was conducted to investigate the effects of wind speeds, train speeds, and yaw angles on the aerodynamic performance of a Fuxing Hao high-speed train running on a bridge under the influence of crosswind. The results show that, for the crosswind cases, the slipstream velocities on the leeward side of the train are generally higher than those in the no-crosswind cases. Moreover, the results were compared for the cases with the same effective yaw angle of 21.8° but different wind speeds (6 m/s, 8 m/s) and train speeds (15 m/s, 20 m/s), which suggests the method of the resultant wind's yaw angle is no longer valid when the train runs on a bridge due to the aerodynamic interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-speed trains (HSTs) are being buffeted by accelerating running speed, and with that comes the aerodynamic issues. The slipstream is related to the train aerodynamic characteristics and of importance to the safety of surrounding people and structures. In this study, the ensemble-averaged and instantaneous characteristics of the slipstream of a simplistic high-speed train model with a square-back were experimentally investigated using a novel moving model rig. The present investigation indicates that the double-line substructure causes obvious asymmetry in the slipstream even at locations apart from the bridge surface with a large distance. The square-back of the HST attenuates its slipstream significantly relative to that with a streamlined tail. Besides, the decaying rate of the slipstream is higher in the wake of a square-back HST. The presents results suggest that the trailing vortices downstream of the square-back HST are substantially suppressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the increase of the running speed of the high-speed train (HST), aerodynamic interference between the HST and surrounding structures becomes more and more important. Traditional wind tunnel experiments using the stationary model can not fully reveal the pulsing behavior of the aerodynamic forces on both the HST and surrounding structures. This paper numerically investigates the aerodynamic characteristics of an HST running on a bridge in cross-wind. The simulation results reveal that when there is no wind barrier, the stationary model case with the yaw angle identical to the moving model case can roughly reproduce the main flow structures around the train. However, once the train runs downstream a wind barrier, the stationary model cannot reveal its aerodynamic characteristics regardless of the yaw angle adopted. The moving model scenario successfully captures the pulsing behavior of the forces on both the train and wind barrier, which is concealed in the cases with a stationary model. The present results indicate that only the moving model method can fully reveal the aerodynamic characteristics and interactions between the train and surrounding structures, especially in evaluating their dynamic response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]