Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to show at what rate the technological equipment used in cataract surgery by Turkish ophthalmologists and their knowledge are reflected in practice and how up to date they are. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire conducted using SurveyMonkey was used to evaluate the answers to 17 questions from 823 members of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association. Results were evaluated in subgroups according to the participants' age, occupational status, institutions, and whether they conducted relevant academic activities, and the data were compared as inadequate, standard, and contemporary approaches according to the determined criteria. Results: Optical biometry devices were used at rates of 77.7% and 67.3% for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations and keratometric measurements in preparation for cataract surgery, respectively. For IOL power calculation, third-generation formulas, especially the SRK-T, were used most commonly (46.2%), followed by second-generation formulas (21.9%), and fourth/fifth-generation formulas and multiple evaluations for different axial lengths (31.9%). The most common incision size was 2.8 mm (51.6%), while the percentage of 2.2 mm and shorter incisions considered to be neutral in terms of surgically induced astigmatism was 18.8%. When selecting incision location, approaches to reduce corneal astigmatism were reported by 28.9%, neutral approaches by 26.2%, and insensitive approaches by 44.9%. Additionally, 55.6% of participants never implanted toric IOLs and 50.7% did not use presbyopia-correcting IOLs. The proportion of surgeons who have experience with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was 10.3% and the rate of intracameral antibiotic injection at the end of the operation was 89.4%. Conclusion: It was seen that Turkish cataract surgeons were able to use high technology for surgical preparation and surgery at high rates, but this was not reflected in practice at same rate in terms of achieving contemporary standards of refractive cataract surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our aim was to investigate the effects of two α1-adrenergic blockers—tamsulosin and alfuzosin—on pupil diameter (PD). In this prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial, 64 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia received treatment with either tamsulosin or alfuzosin. The same ophthalmologist, masked to the given medication, evaluated patients prior to, 4 weeks after and 6 months after the start of the medication (day 0, day 28 and month 6). Best corrected visual acuity and PD under mesopic, scotopic, and dilated conditions were measured. t-test, ANOVA, and Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-test were used for statistical analysis. With tamsulosin treatment, both mesopic and scotopic PD decreased, respectively, from 3.9 ± 0.7 and 5.7 ± 0.6 mm at day 0 to 3.6 ± 0.9 and 5.5 ± 0.8 mm at day 28, and 3.6 ± 0.7 and 5.4 ± 0.7 mm at month 6 (ANOVA; P = 0.021 and = 0.040, respectively). However, the difference in dilated PD was not significant (day 0 7.8 ± 0.6 mm, day 28 7.7 ± 0.7 mm, and month 6 7.6 ± 0.6 mm, P = 0.379). In the alfuzosin group, PD did not differ significantly from the baseline except for the scotopic measurements, which decreased from 5.6 ± 0.6 mm at day 0 to 5.5 ± 0.6 mm at day 28 and 5.2 ± 0.8 mm at month 6 ( P = 0.004). Compared to baseline values, small but statistically significant decreases were detected in mesopic and scotopic illumination in patients treated with tamsulosin and in scotopic PD in patients treated with alfuzosin. The clinical significance of these differences needs further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of ophthalmic antibiotic ointment in the anterior chamber following uneventful phacoemulsification surgery. Antibiotic ointment was observed in the superior angle beneath the clear corneal wound one month later. The patient remained asymptomatic for 26 months after surgery until mild iritis developed. The ointment was removed through a limbal incision superiorly via passive expression. Visual acuity declined to 20/200 after explantation on postoperative day one. Fluorescein angiography revealed cystoid macular edema. The treatment was refractory to topical steroid and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, however responded well to intravitreal triamcinolone injection. Ophthalmic ointments may ingress into the anterior chamber through unstable clear corneal incisions. Although a globule of ointment may remain inert for a long time, its delayed extraction may be associated with cystoid macular edema. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare a bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in terms of safety, efficacy and blocking quality in peribulbar anaesthesia for phacoemulsification. Methods: A total of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery with peribulbar anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups of 35 patients each, to receive 5 ml of, respectively, a 1 : 1 mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% (group 1), levobupivacaine 0.75% (group 2), or ropivacaine 1% (group 3). Ocular movement scores were evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mins after injection. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesia were evaluated by verbal pain scores. Duration of surgery, need for supplementary anaesthesia, haemodynamic parameters and the incidence of perioperative complications were recorded. Results: The ocular movement score in min 2 was significantly lower in group 1. There was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3. Ocular movement scores at mins 4 and 6 were significantly decreased in group 1 and 2 compared with group 3. There was no significant difference among the groups in ocular movement scores at mins 8 and 10. Verbal pain scores in postoperative hour 4 were highest in group 3, but scores for the intraoperative period and postoperative hours 1 and 2 were similar among the groups. Duration of surgery and haemodynamic parameters did not differ among the groups. Conclusions: All agents were considered to be convenient for clinical use in cataract surgery with peribulbar anaesthesia. Although the ocular movement scores in the ropivacaine group were higher than in the other groups at mins 4 and 6, this did not imply any clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of brinzolamide 1%, brimonidine 0.2%, acetazolamide 250 mg, intracameral acetylcholine, and timolol 0.5% in preventing intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks during the early period after phacoemulsification in which sodium chondroitin sulfate 4%–sodium hyaluronate 3% (Viscoat) was used as the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey. Methods: This prospective randomized study comprised 185 eyes of 185 patients with uncomplicated cataract scheduled for phacoemulsification using Viscoat as the OVD. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 groups: postoperative application of topical brinzolamide 1%, brimonidine 0.2%, oral acetazolamide 250 mg, intracameral acetylcholine, timolol 0.5%, or no ocular hypotensive agent (control group). The IOP was measured at baseline (preoperatively) as well as 6 hours, 20 to 24 hours, and 1 week after surgery. Results: The mean preoperative IOP values were not significantly different between the groups. Six hours and 20 to 24 hours postoperatively, the mean IOP was significantly lower in all groups receiving an ocular hypotensive agent than in the control group (P<.01). Six hours after surgery, the mean IOP significantly increased in all groups but was higher in the control group. At 20 to 24 hours, the mean IOP decreased significantly in all ocular hypotensive agent groups but remained significantly high in the control group. One week after surgery, there were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Brinzolamide, brimonidine, acetazolamide, intracameral acetylcholine, and timolol had similar effects in reducing IOP increases after phacoemulsification performed using Viscoat. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: To compare 4 methods for intraoperative pupil dilatation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome and insufficient pupil size during phacoemulsification.Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional case series.Participants: Forty eyes of 40 patients with pseudoexfoliation and maximally dilated pupil size smaller than 3.5 mm.Intervention: Mechanical pupil dilatation with iris-retractor hooks (group I), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) pupil dilator-ring (Morcher, Stuttgart, Germany) (group II), Beehler pupil dilator (group III), and bimanual stretching (group IV).Main outcome measures: Performance (pupil size achieved), complications, and added surgical time.Results: The mean pupil sizes achieved with the PMMA pupil-dilator ring, Beehler pupil dilator, and bimanual stretching were 5.9±0.6 mm, 5.5±0.8 mm, and 4.9±0.7 mm, respectively. A square-shaped pupil was achieved with iris-retractor hooks, and the mean size of the largest circle that can fit in this square was 5.6±0.6 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in the postdilatation pupil sizes between the 4 study groups (P>0.05). Apart from self-limited intraoperative hemorrhage from pupil margin, iris sphincter rupture was the only observed complication related to mechanical pupil dilatation. This occurred in 4 eyes in groups I and III, 3 eyes in group IV, and 1 eye in group II (P>0.05). The mean added surgical time for placement of iris-retractor hooks and for implantation of a PMMA pupil-dilator ring was 297±51 and 176±54 seconds, respectively. The additional time required for pupil dilatation with the Beehler pupil dilator and bimanual stretching was 65±8 and 55±10 seconds, respectively. The time needed for pupil dilatation in groups I and II is significantly longer than that in groups III and IV (P<0.001).Conclusions: All 4 methods used in this study were effective procedures for the mechanical dilatation of small pupils secondary to pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Iris-retractor hooks and the PMMA pupil-dilator ring are the most time-consuming techniques but have the advantage of a stable pupil size throughout the surgery. The PMMA pupil-dilator ring causes the least iris trauma. The Beehler pupil dilator and bimanual stretching technique were the least time-consuming methods for mechanical pupil dilatation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]