Search

A total of 241 mitochondrial genomes were assembled and annotated from the SRA database to reconstruct a mtDNA genome phylogeny for the genus Drosophila, the family Drosophilidae, and close relatives. The resulting mtDNA genome phylogeny is largely congruent with previous higher-level analyses of Drosophila species with the exception of the relationships between the melanogaster, montium, anannassae, saltans and obscura groups. Although relationships within these species groups are congruent between nuclear and mtDNA studies, the mtDNA genome phylogeny of the groups is different when compared to earlier studies. Monophyly of known species groups within the genus Drosophila are highly supported and, as in previous work, the genera Lordiphosa, Hirtodrosophila, Zaprionus and Scaptomya are all imbedded within the genus Drosophila. Incongruence and partitioned support analyses indicate that DNA sequences are better at resolving the phylogeny than their translated protein sequences. Such analyses also indicate that genes on the minus strand of the circular molecule (Lrrna, Srrna, ND4, ND4L and ND5) provide most of the support for the overall phylogenetic hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Hawaiian Drosophilidae are comprised of an estimated 1000 species, all arising from a single common ancestor in the last 25 million years. This group, because of its species diversity, marked sexual dimorphism and complex mating behavior, host plant specificity, and the well-known chronology of the Hawaiian Archipelago, is an excellent model system for evolutionary studies. Here we present a phylogeny of this group based on ∼2.6kb of mitochondrial DNA sequence. Our taxon sampling is the most extensive to date, with nearly 200 species representing all species groups and most subgroups from the larger clades. Our results suggest that the picture wing and modified mouthpart species, long believed to be derived within this radiation, may actually occupy a basal position in the phylogeny. The haleakale species group, in contrast, is strongly supported as sister to the AMC clade. We use the phylogenetic results to examine the evolution of two important ecological characters, the host family and type of substrate used for oviposition and larval development. Although both host and substrate transitions are common in the group, oviposition substrate is more conserved among species groups than host plant family. While the ancestral host plant family is equivocally reconstructed, our results suggest that the ancestor of this group may have used rotting bark as a primary oviposition substrate. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]