Search

Background: The extended endonasal approach has been utilized in the resection of anterior skull base lesions in the pediatric population. There are unique challenges to these patients in the post‐operative setting, including patient compliance with medical therapy and post‐operative debridements, and a smaller nasal airway that may increase propensity toward scarring. Our objective for this study is to evaluate the incidence of post‐operative radiographic inflammation in this patient population using the Lund‐Mackay (LM) score. Methods: A single‐center, retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing endoscopic approach to the skull base between 2009 and 2021 was performed. Demographic and clinicopathologic data and pre‐ and post‐operative imaging were analyzed. One‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple pairwise comparisons statistical tests were used to compare mean LM scores between groups. Results: Seventy‐two patients (52 males, 20 females) were identified with a median follow‐up of 27 months. All patients underwent an extended endonasal approach for resection of skull base lesions. The mean LM scores were compared between pre‐operative MRI, first post‐operative MRI > 30 days after surgery, and most recent post‐operative MRI. One‐way ANOVA was performed with significant differences noted between the groups (p < 0.001). Tukey multiple pairwise comparisons test was then performed and noted significant differences between the pre‐operative and first post‐operative LM (p < 0.0001) and the first post‐operative and most recent LM (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference noted between the pre‐operative LM score and most recent LM score (p = 0.14). Conclusion: Despite concerns regarding possible subsequent development of chronic rhinosinusitis following endoscopic skull base surgery in pediatric patients, the current study suggests that transient radiographic evidence of sinus inflammation can be seen up to six months postoperatively, which appears to resolve by approximately two years after surgery. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2014–2017, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine in-hospital costs associated with performing an EEA to anterior skull base pathology and to identify drivers of cost variability for patients undergoing endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Methods: All endoscopic anterior skull base surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 24th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using Stata software. Results: An EEA was associated with an average total in-hospital cost of $44 545. Compared to patients undergoing a transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumor resection, EEA patients incurred higher in-hospital costs across all variables including a total cost increase of $15 921 (95% confidence interval $5720-26 122, P =.002). Univariate analysis of all endoscopic anterior skull base surgery patients showed a cost increase of $30 616 associated with post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak ($10 420-50 811, P =.004), $14 610 with post-operative diabetes insipidus (DI) ($4610-24 609, P =.004), and $11 522 with African-American patients relative to Caucasian patients ($3049-19 995, P =.008). Conclusions: Patients who undergo endoscopic EEA for resection of anterior skull base tumors typically incur greater in-hospital costs than patients undergoing a standard TSA. Post-operative complications such as CSF leak and DI, as well as ethnicity, are significant drivers of cost-variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction  Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) are often associated with loss of smell following resection. Loss of smell has a measurable impact on quality of life. Smell preservation has been previously described in open approaches for early stage or unilateral OGMs. Evidence of smell preservation in endoscopic approaches is lacking. Design  A multi-institutional retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients who underwent unilateral endoscopic endonasal resection of OGM. A gross total resection was achieved with preservation of the contralateral olfactory cleft and bulb. Olfactory function was assessed with a six-point olfactory symptom score and the Sniffin' Sticks 12-item smell identification test (SS-12). Contralateral olfactory bulb volume was measured on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Results  Four patients (age 42.0 ± 7.5, 75% female) were assessed. Olfactory function was assessed at 21.8 ± 5.6 months following surgery. All patients reported some degree of smell preservation (75% described a slight/mild impairment in smell or better). Olfactory identification was preserved with an SS-12 score of 9 ± 1.4 (anosmia defined as ≤6). The olfactory bulb volume was calculated to be 47.4 ± 15.9 mm 3 (normal >40 mm 3). Conclusion  Smell preservation is possible following unilateral endoscopic endonasal resection of carefully selected OGM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Postoperative CSF leak is the most common complication of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to skull base lesions. Endoscopic multilayer closure of skull base defect using pedicled nasoseptal flaps (NSF) based off the sphenopalatine artery reduces CSF leaks. EEA robustly expands in surgical arena, yet postoperative imaging evaluation remains poorly studied. This work illustrates normal MR imaging appearance of skull base reconstruction utilizing NSFs during immediate postoperative period. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who had skull base reconstructions utilizing NSFs following EEAs and immediate postoperative-enhanced brain MRI. NSFs and free grafts were evaluated for signal intensity, thickness, configuration, enhancement, vascular pedicle of NSF, relationship in multilayer reconstruction, and defect coverage. Imaging findings were correlated with surgical technique and CSF leaks. Results: Twenty-eight patients had 26 multilayer reconstructions and 34 NSFs. Twenty-nine NSFs showed enhancing C-shaped arc at the skull base. Of those, 26 flaps (90%) were confidently identified by visualization of their vascular pedicles, 3 were not distinguishable from adjacent mucosa and pedicles were not identified. Five NSFs showed no enhancement (1 CSF leak). Twenty-seven enhancing NSFs approximated defects with close abutment to free grafts. One flap was displaced; one incompletely covered the defect (2 CSF leaks). Fisher exact test demonstrated an association between incomplete defect coverage and displacement of NSFs with CSF leak (P =0.05). Conclusion: Endoscopic skull base reconstruction utilizing NSF has characteristic MR imaging appearance. Non-enhancing mucosal gap or displacement of NSF may indicate incomplete defect coverage, identifying patients at risk for CSF leak. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background/Aims: Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) are challenging tumors for surgical resection. Endoscopic endonasal (EE) approaches to these lesions have not been directly compared to open craniotomy in a controlled trial. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase online databases for English-language articles containing key words related to TSMs. Data were pooled, including 5 of our own patients reported here for the first time. Metaregression was used and a decision-analytical model was constructed to compare outcomes between open microsurgery and EE approaches. Results: The overall quality of life (QOL) was not significantly different between the approaches (p = 0.410); however, there were large differences in individual complication rates. The Monte Carlo simulation yielded an overall average QOL in craniotomy patients of 0.915 and in endoscopic patients of 0.952. Endoscopy had a higher CSF leak rate (26.8 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001) but a lower rate of injury to the optic apparatus (1.4 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001) compared with craniotomy. The 3-year recurrence rates were not statistically different (p = 0.529). Conclusion: EE resection of TSMs appears to be a comparable alternative to traditional open microsurgical resection with respect to overall QOL based on available publications. A meaningful comparison of recurrence rates will require a longer follow-up. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are adverse effects after surgery, which may increase the risk of complications. Aprepitant is a neurokinin‐1 receptor blocker and has been shown to reduce chemotherapy‐related nausea and vomiting and PONV. However, its role in endoscopic skull base surgery remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of aprepitant in reducing PONV in endoscopic transsphenoidal (TSA) pituitary surgery. Methods: A retrospective chart review between July 2021 and January 2023 of 127 consecutive patients who underwent TSA was performed at a tertiary academic institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative aprepitant use. Two groups were matched based on known risk factors of PONV (age, sex, nonsmoking, and history of PONV). The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcome measures included the number of anti‐emetic use, length of stay, and postoperative cererebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Results: After matching, 48 patients were included in each group. The aprepitant group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of vomiting than the non‐aprepitant group (2.1% vs 22.9%, p = 0.002). The number of nausea episodes and anti‐emetic use decreased with aprepitant use (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of nausea, length of stay, or postoperative CSF leak. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that aprepitant decreased the incidence of postoperative vomiting with odds ratio of 0.107. Conclusion: Aprepitant may serve as a useful preoperative treatment to reduce PONV in patients undergoing TSA. Further studies are needed to evaluate its impact in other arenas of endoscopic skull base surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of a study which examined patients undergoing extended endoscopic approach (EEA) for skull base tumors is presented.

Background: Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence‐based guidance. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated. Results: A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction. Conclusion: The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high‐quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea; natural orifice endoscopic surgery; skull base; therapeutics EN cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea natural orifice endoscopic surgery skull base therapeutics 321 323 3 02/22/22 20220301 NES 220301 INTRODUCTION The last decade has seen the utilization of endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in resection of tumors with intradural components.1 EEA for intracranial masses is both possible and effective.2-4 When compared to transcranial approach, EEA has demonstrated superior vision outcomes, equivalent rates of total resection and complication, and stable quality of life outcomes.5,6 Successful EEA requires adequate skull base closure to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. There was no significant difference in postoperative CSF leak rates between pediatric and adult groups, underscoring EEA with NSF repair as a successful and safe technique in the surgical resection of pediatric anterior skull base tumors. One recent study examined NSF skull base reconstruction in a cohort of 12 post-EEA pediatric patients.9 Complications included one CSF leak, with a leak rate of 8.33%. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Patients undergoing endoscopic resection of neoplasms with both sinonasal and skull base involvement can develop chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after treatment and may occasionally benefit from additional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We investigate risk factors and outcomes associated with revision ESS (rESS) after endoscopic skull‐base surgery (SBS) for neoplasms with combined sinonasal and skull base involvement. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with neoplasms with both sinonasal and skull base involvement who underwent endoscopic resection at a single tertiary care academic institution from 2004 through 2017 was performed. Eighty‐three patients were included. Main outcome measures included incidence and timing of revision surgery, Lund‐Mackay (LM) scores, and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) scores. Results: rESS was performed in 21 (25%) cases, 15 (18%) of which were due to CRS. Time between initial resection and rESS was an average of 42 months (range, 6 to 142 months). Pre‐SBS and post‐SBS LM scores were not significantly different (5.0 vs 4.7, p = 0.640), although pre‐SBS and post‐SBS SNOT‐22 scores showed significant improvement (32.6 vs 24.5, p = 0.030). Malignant pathology correlated with need for rESS (odds ratio [OR] 5.07, p = 0.04), as well as treatment including chemotherapy (OR 5.10, p = 0.003) and radiation (OR 4.15, p = 0.013). Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients develop clinically significant sinusitis after endoscopic SBS for neoplasms with combined sinonasal and skull base involvement and may benefit from rESS. Intervention occurred, on average, 3.5 years after initial tumor resection. Malignant pathology, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy correlate with need for rESS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]