Search

In this paper, the first real-time implementation and perceptual evaluation of a singular value decomposition (SVD)-based optimal filtering technique for noise reduction in a dual microphone behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid is presented. This evaluation was carried out for a speech weighted noise and multitalker babble, for single and multiple jammer sound source scenarios. Two basic microphone configurations in the hearing aid were used. The SVD-based optimal filtering technique was compared against an adaptive beamformer, which is known to give significant improvements in speech intelligibility in noisy environment. The optimal filtering technique works without assumptions about a speaker position, unlike the two-stage adaptive beamformer. However this strategy needs a robust voice activity detector (VAD). A method to improve the performance of the VAD was presented and evaluated physically. By connecting the VAD to the output of the noise reduction algorithms, a good discrimination between the speech-and-noise periods and the noise-only periods of the signals was obtained. The perceptual experiments demonstrated that the SVD-based optimal filtering technique could perform as well as the adaptive beamformer in a single noise source scenario, i.e., the ideal scenario for the latter technique, and could outperform the adaptive beamformer in multiple noise source scenarios. Index Terms--Adaptive beamformer, hearing aids, noise reduction algorithms, optimal filtering technique, singular value decomposition, voice activity detector.

A multi-channel noise reduction technique is presented based on a Speech Distortion-Weighted Multi-channel Wiener Filter (SDW-MWF) approach that incorporates the conditional Speech Presence Probability (SPP). A traditional SDW-MWF uses a fixed parameter to a trade-off between noise reduction and speech distortion without taking speech presence into account. Consequently, the improvement in noise reduction comes at the cost of a higher speech distortion since the speech dominant segments and the noise dominant segments are weighted equally. Incorporating the conditional SPP in SDW-MWF allows to exploit the fact that speech may not be present at all frequencies and at all times, while the noise can indeed be continuously present. In speech dominant segments it is then desirable to have less noise reduction to avoid speech distortion, while in noise dominant segments it is desirable to have as much noise reduction as possible. Experimental results with hearing aid scenarios demonstrate that the proposed SDW-MWF incorporating the conditional SPP improves the signal-to-noise ratio compared to a traditional SDW-MWF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a binaural hearing aid system, output signals need to be generated for the left and the right ear. Using the binaural multichannel Wiener filter (MWF), which exploits all microphone signals from both hearing aids, a significant reduction of background noise can be achieved. However, due to power and bandwidth limitations of the binaural link, it is typically not possible to transmit all microphone signals between the hearing aids. To limit the amount of transmitted information, this paper presents reduced-bandwidth MWF-based noise reduction algorithms, where a filtered combination of the contralateral microphone signals is transmitted. A first scheme uses a signal-independent beamformer, whereas a second scheme uses the output of a monaural MWF on the contralateral microphone signals and a third scheme involves an iterative distributed MWF (DB-MWF) procedure. It is shown that in the case of a rank-1 speech correlation matrix, corresponding to a single speech source, the DB-MWF procedure converges to the binaural MWF solution. Experimental results compare the noise reduction performance of the reduced-bandwidth algorithms with respect to the benchmark binaural MWF. It is shown that the best performance of the reduced-bandwidth algorithms is obtained by the DB-MWF procedure and that the performance of the DB-MWF procedure approaches quite well the optimal performance of the binaural MWF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper evaluates the influence of three multimicrophone noise reduction algorithms on the ability to localize sound sources. Two recently developed noise reduction techniques for binaural hearing aids were evaluated, namely, the binaural multichannel Wiener filter (MWF) and the binaural multichannel Wiener filter with partial noise estimate (MWF-N), together with a dual-monaural adaptive directional microphone (ADM), which is a widely used noise reduction approach in commercial hearing aids. The influence of the different algorithms on perceived sound source localization and their noise reduction performance was evaluated. It is shown that noise reduction algorithms can have a large influence on localization and that (a) the ADM only preserves localization in the forward direction over azimuths where limited or no noise reduction is obtained; (b) the MWF preserves localization of the target speech component but may distort localization of the noise component. The latter is dependent on signal-to-noise ratio and masking effects; (c) the MWF-N enables correct localization of both the speech and the noise components; (d) the statistical Wiener filter approach introduces a better combination of sound source localization and noise reduction performance than the ADM approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, solutions for combined feedback and noise suppression in hearing aids are developed. The techniques presented are based on the generalized sidelobe canceller (GSC) and adaptive feedback canceller (AFC), with a prediction error method (PEM) adaptation to avoid speech distortion. Two possible cascades of GSC-based noise reduction and AFC, namely an ldquoAFC firstrdquo and a ldquoGSC first,rdquo as well as a truly integrated solution that jointly suppresses feedback and noise are discussed. The integrated solution (called PEM-GFIC) achieves optimum synergies between noise and feedback suppression at the lowest computational cost. In addition, it cancels more feedback than the generalized echo and interference canceller, a joint solution for echo and noise suppression. In the cascaded solutions, the feedback and noise suppression filters are not always optimally exploited. For high input SNRs, ldquoAFC firstrdquo scheme generally may achieve better feedback cancellation because of its larger number of degrees of freedom. However, noise reduction by the GSC-stage seriously affects the feedback cancellation performance. At low SNRs, ldquoGSC firstrdquo generally achieves more feedback cancellation than PEM-GFIC at the expense of worse noise reduction. At high hearing aid gains and/or large SNRs, the noise reduction stage however negatively affects the performance of the feedback cancellation filter, resulting in a worse feedback and noise suppression compared to PEM-GFIC. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

This paper studies the effect of bilateral hearing aids on directional hearing in the frontal horizontal plane. Localization tests evaluated bilateral hearing aid users using different stimuli and different noise scenarios. Normal hearing subjects were used as a reference. The main research questions raised in this paper are: (i) How do bilateral hearing aid users perform on a localization task, relative to normal hearing subjects? (ii) Do bilateral hearing aids preserve localization cues, and (iii) Is there an influence of state of the art noise reduction algorithms, more in particular an adaptive directional microphone configuration, on localization performance? The hearing aid users were tested without and with their hearing aids, using both a standard omnidirectional microphone configuration and an adaptive directional microphone configuration. The following main conclusions are drawn. (i) Bilateral hearing aid users perform worse than normal hearing subjects in a localization task, although more than one-half of the subjects reach normal hearing performance when tested unaided. For both groups, localization performance drops significantly when acoustical scenarios become more complex. (ii) Bilateral, i.e., independently operating hearing aids do not preserve localization cues. (iii) Overall, adaptive directional noise reduction can have an additional and significant negative impact on localization performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We introduce a new SVD-based (singular value decomposition) strategy for noise reduction in hearing aids. This technique is evaluated for noise reduction in a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid where two omnidirectional microphones are mounted in an endfire configuration. The behaviour of the SVD-based technique is compared to a two-stage adaptive beamformer for hearing aids developed by Vanden Berghe and Wouters (1998). The evaluation and comparison is done with a performance metric based on the speech intelligibility index (SII). The speech and noise signals are recorded in reverberant conditions with a signal-to-noise ratio of 0 dB and the spectrum of the noise signals is similar to the spectrum of the speech signal. The SVD-based technique works without initialization nor assumptions about a look direction, unlike the two-stage adaptive beamformer. Still, for different noise scenarios, the SVD-based technique performs as well as the two-stage adaptive beamformer, for a similar filter length and adaptation time for the filter coefficients. In a diffuse noise scenario, the SVD-based technique performs better than the two-stage adaptive beamformer and hence provides a more flexible and robust solution under speaker position variations and reverberant conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Double-talk (DT)-robust acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) and acoustic feedback cancellation (AFC) are needed in speech communication systems, e.g., in hands-free communication systems and hearing aids. In this paper, we derive a practical and computationally efficient algorithm based on the frequency-domain adaptive filter prediction error method using row operations (FDAF-PEM-AFROW) for DT-robust AEC and AFC. The proposed algorithm features two main modifications: (a) the Wiener variable step size (WVSS) and (b) the gradient spectral variance smoothing (GSVS). In AEC simulations, the WVSS-GSVS-FDAF-PEM-AFROW algorithm obtains outstanding robustness and smooth adaptation in highly adverse scenarios such as in bursting DT at high levels, and in a change of acoustic path during continuous DT. Similarly, in AFC simulations, the algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms when using a low-order near-end speech model and in colored non-stationary noise. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Recently, a generalized multi-microphone noise reduction scheme, referred to as the spatially pre-processed speech distortion weighted multichannel Wiener filter (SP-SDW-MWF), has been presented. This scheme consists of a fixed spatial pre-processor and a multichannel adaptive noise canceler (ANC) optimizing the SDW-MWF cost function. By taking speech distortion explicitly into account in the design criterion of the multichannel ANC, the SP-SDW-MWF adds robustness to the standard generalized sidelobe canceler (GSC). In this paper, we present a multichannel frequency-domain criterion for the SDW-MWF, from which several – existing and novel – adaptive frequency-domain algorithms can be derived. The main difference between these adaptive algorithms consists in the calculation of the step size matrix (constrained vs. unconstrained, block-structured vs. diagonal) used in the update formula for the multichannel adaptive filter. We investigate the noise reduction performance, the robustness and the tracking performance of these adaptive algorithms, using a perfect voice activity detection (VAD) mechanism and using an energy-based VAD. Using experimental results with a small-sized microphone array in a hearing aid, it is shown that the SP-SDW-MWF is more robust against signal model errors than the GSC, and that the block-structured step size matrix gives rise to a faster convergence and a better tracking performance than the diagonal step size matrix, only at a slightly higher computational cost. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]