Search

Diverse Tc1/mariner elements with the DD37E signature have been detected. However, their evolutionary relationship and profiles are largely unknown. Using bioinformatics methods, we defined the evolution profile of a Tc1/Mariner family, which harbors the catalytic domain with the DD37E signature, and renamed it DD37E/Mosquito (MS). MS transposons form a separate monophyletic clade in the phylogenetic tree, distinct from the other two groups of elements with the DD37E signature, DD37E/L18 and DD37E/TRT (transposon related to Tc1), and represent a very different taxonomic distribution from that of DD37E/TRT. MS is only detected in invertebrate and is mostly present in Arthropoda, as well as in Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Mollusca, Nematoda, and Platyhelminthes, with a total length of about 1.3 kb, containing an open reading frame (ORF) encoding about 340 amino acids transposases, with a conserved DD37E catalytic domain. The terminal inverted repeat (TIR) lengths range from 19 bp to 203 bp, and the target site duplication (TSD) is TA. We also identified few occurrences of MS horizontal transfers (HT) across lineages of diptera. In this paper, the distribution characteristics, structural characteristics, phylogenetic evolution, and horizontal transfer of the MS family are fully analyzed, which is conducive to supplementing and improving the Tc1/Mariner superfamily and excavating active transposons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Despite the discovery of the Tigger family of pogo transposons in the mammalian genome, the evolution profile of this family is still incomplete. Here, we conducted a systematic evolution analysis for Tigger in nature. The data revealed that Tigger was found in a broad variety of animals, and extensive invasion of Tigger was observed in mammal genomes. Common horizontal transfer events of Tigger elements were observed across different lineages of animals, including mammals, that may have led to their widespread distribution, while parasites and invasive species may have promoted Tigger HT events. Our results also indicate that the activity of Tigger transposons tends to be low in vertebrates; only one mammalian genome and fish genome may harbor active Tigger. The data of this study revealed that Tigger was found in a wide variety of animal genomes, including 180 species from 36 orders of invertebrates and 145 species from 29 orders of vertebrates. An extensive invasion of Tigger was observed in mammals, with a high copy number. Almost 61% of those species contain more than 50 copies of Tigger; however, 46% harbor intact Tigger elements, although the number of these intact elements is very low. Common HT events of Tigger elements were discovered across different lineages of animals, including mammals, that may have led to their widespread distribution, whereas Helogale parvula and arthropods may have aided Tigger HT incidences. The activity of Tigger seems to be low in the kingdom of animals, most copies were truncated in the mammal genomes and lost their transposition activity, and Tigger transposons only display signs of recent and current activities in a few species of animals. The findings suggest that the Tigger family is important in structuring mammal genomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Buster transposons display a widely taxonomic distribution across vertebrates and invertebrates. • Horizontal transfer events of Buster transposons were detected across multiple phyla and classes of animals. • Both parasites and invasive species may facilitate HT events of Buster. • Currently, activities of Buster transposons are detected in multiple lineages of animals. Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic elements in the genome and broadly distributed across both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and play an important role in shaping the genome evolution of their hosts. hAT elements are thought to be the most widespread cut-and-paste DNA transposon found throughout the tree of life. Buster is a recently recognized family of hAT. However, the evolutionary profile of the Buster family, such as its taxonomic distribution, evolutionary pattern, and activities, remains largely unknown. We conducted a systematic analysis of the evolutionary landscape of the Buster family and found that most Buster transposons are 1.72–4.66 kilobases (kb) in length, encode 500–736-amino acid (aa) transposases and are flanked by short (10–18 bp) terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) and 8 bp target site duplications (TSDs). Buster family is widely distributed in 609 species, involving eight classes of invertebrates and most lineage of vertebrates (including mammals). Horizontal transfer events were detected across multiple phyla and classes of animals, which may have contributed to their wide distribution, and both parasites and invasive species may facilitate HT events of Buster in vertebrates. Our data also suggest that Buster transposons are young, highly active, and appear as intact copies in multiple lineages of animals. High percentages of intact copies (>30%) were identified in some Arthropoda, Actinopterygii, Agnatha, and reptile species, and some of these may be active. These data will help increase understanding of the evolution of the hAT superfamily and its impact on eukaryotic genome evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • maTs , GTs and VSs showed differential evolution patterns in eukaryotes. • DD37D and DD39D family composed an independent clade, with close to DD41D and DD34D. • HT might exist a lower rate of maTs between invertebrates and GTs between land plant. • Most of maTs and GTs might encoded active transposases possess intact characters. DNA transposons play a significant role in shaping the size and structure of eukaryotic genomes. The Tc1/mariner transposons are the most diverse and widely distributed superfamily of DNA transposons and the structure and distribution of several Tc1/mariner families, such as DD35E/ TR , DD36E/ IC , DD37E/ TRT , and DD41D/ VS, have been well studied. Nonetheless, a greater understanding of the structure and diversity of Tc1/mariner transposons will provide insight into the evolutionary history of eukaryotic genomes. Here, we conducted further analysis of DD37D/ maT and DD39D (named Guest , GT), which were identified by the specific catalytic domains DD37D and DD39D. Most transposons of the maT family have a total length of approximately 1.3 kb and harbor a single open reading frame encoding a ~ 346 amino acid (range 302–398 aa) transposase protein, flanked by short terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) (13–48 base pairs, bp). In contrast, GT s transposons were longer (2.0–5.8 kb), encoded a transposase protein of ~400 aa (range 140–592 aa), and were flanked by short TIRs (19–41 bp). Several conserved motifs, including two helix–turn–helix (HTH) motifs, a GRPR (GRKR) motif, a nuclear localization sequence, and a DDD domain, were also identified in maT and GT transposases. Phylogenetic analyses of the DDD domain showed that the maT and GT families each belong to a monophyletic clade and appear to be closely related to DD41D/ VS and DD34D/ mariner. In addition, maT s are mainly distributed in invertebrates (144 species), whereas GT s are mainly distributed in land plants through a small number of GT s are present in Chromista and animals. Sequence identity and phylogenetic analysis revealed that horizontal transfer (HT) events of maT and GT might occur between kingdoms and phyla of eukaryotes; however, pairwise distance comparisons between host genes and transposons indicated that HT events involving maT s might be less frequent between invertebrate species and HT events involving GT s may be less frequent between land plant species. Overall, the DD37D/ maT and DD39D/ GT families display significantly different distribution and tend to be identified in more ancient evolutionary families. The discovery of intact transposases, perfect TIRs, and target site duplications (TSD) of maT s and GT s illustrates that the DD37D/ maT and DD39D/ GT families may be active. Together, these findings improve our understanding of the diversity of Tc1 / mariner transposons and their impact on eukaryotic genome evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]