47 results on '"Moore, Sarah A."'
Search Results
2. Additional blood meals increase sporozoite infection in Anopheles mosquitoes but not Plasmodium falciparum genetic diversity
- Author
-
Hofer, Lorenz M., Kweyamba, Prisca A., Sayi, Rajabu M., Chabo, Mohamed S., Mwanga, Rehema, Maitra, Sonali L., Somboka, Mariam M., Schnoz, Annina, Golumbeanu, Monica, Schneeberger, Pierre H. H., Ross, Amanda, Habtewold, Tibebu, Nsanzabana, Christian, Moore, Sarah J., and Tambwe, Mgeni M.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Complete series method (CSM): a convenient method to reduce daily heterogeneity when evaluating the regeneration time (RT) of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs)
- Author
-
Lugenge, Aidi Galus, Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Mseti, Jilly Jackson, Swai, Johnson Kyeba, Skovmand, Ole, and Moore, Sarah Jane
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Evaluating human landing catches as a measure of mosquito biting and the importance of considering additional modes of action
- Author
-
Fairbanks, Emma L, Tambwe, Mgeni M., Moore, Jason, Mpelepele, Ahmed, Lobo, Neil F., Mashauri, Rajabu, Chitnis, Nakul, and Moore, Sarah J.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Time of exposure and assessment influence the mortality induced by insecticides against metabolic resistant mosquitoes
- Author
-
Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Bradley, John, Ngonyani, Safina, Mpelepele, Ahmadi Bakari, Matanila, Isaya, Muganga, Joseph B., Bosselmann, Rune, Skovmand, Ole, Mboma, Zawadi Mageni, and Moore, Sarah Jane
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Insecticide-treated eave nets and window screens for malaria control in Chalinze district, Tanzania: a study protocol for a household randomised control trial
- Author
-
Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Moore, Sarah Jane, Mboma, Zawadi Mageni, Mbuba, Emmanuel, Muganga, Joseph Barnabas, Moore, Jason, Philipo, Rose, Rashid, Mohammed Ally, Bosselmann, Rune, Skovmand, Ole, and Bradley, John
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. “In starvation, a bone can also be meat”: a mixed methods evaluation of factors associated with discarding of long-lasting insecticidal nets in Bagamoyo, Tanzania
- Author
-
Madumla, Edith P., Moore, Sarah J., Moore, Jason, Mbuba, Emmanuel, Mbeyela, Edgar M., Kibondo, Ummi A., C, Selemani, Mmbaga, Kobe, Dickson, Baraka, Jitihada, Msellemu, Daniel, Swai, Johnson K., Mboma, Zawadi M., and Odufuwa, Olukayode G.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Comparison of cone bioassay estimates at two laboratories with different Anopheles mosquitoes for quality assurance of pyrethroid insecticide-treated nets
- Author
-
Mbwambo, Stephen G., Bubun, Nakei, Mbuba, Emmanuel, Moore, Jason, Mbina, Kasiani, Kamande, Dismas, Laman, Moses, Mpolya, Emmanuel, Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Freeman, Tim, Karl, Stephan, and Moore, Sarah J.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Screening of malaria infections in human blood samples with varying parasite densities and anaemic conditions using AI-Powered mid-infrared spectroscopy.
- Author
-
Mshani, Issa H., Jackson, Frank M., Mwanga, Rehema Y., Kweyamba, Prisca A., Mwanga, Emmanuel P., Tambwe, Mgeni M., Hofer, Lorenz M., Siria, Doreen J., González-Jiménez, Mario, Wynne, Klaas, Moore, Sarah J., Okumu, Fredros, Babayan, Simon A., and Baldini, Francesco
- Subjects
MID-infrared spectroscopy ,ARTIFICIAL intelligence ,MALARIA ,MEDICAL screening ,BLOOD sampling - Abstract
Background: Effective testing for malaria, including the detection of infections at very low densities, is vital for the successful elimination of the disease. Unfortunately, existing methods are either inexpensive but poorly sensitive or sensitive but costly. Recent studies have shown that mid-infrared spectroscopy coupled with machine learning (MIRs-ML) has potential for rapidly detecting malaria infections but requires further evaluation on diverse samples representative of natural infections in endemic areas. The aim of this study was, therefore, to demonstrate a simple AI-powered, reagent-free, and user-friendly approach that uses mid-infrared spectra from dried blood spots to accurately detect malaria infections across varying parasite densities and anaemic conditions. Methods: Plasmodium falciparum strains NF54 and FCR3 were cultured and mixed with blood from 70 malaria-free individuals to create various malaria parasitaemia and anaemic conditions. Blood dilutions produced three haematocrit ratios (50%, 25%, 12.5%) and five parasitaemia levels (6%, 0.1%, 0.002%, 0.00003%, 0%). Dried blood spots were prepared on Whatman
™ filter papers and scanned using attenuated total reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) for machine-learning analysis. Three classifiers were trained on an 80%/20% split of 4655 spectra: (I) high contrast (6% parasitaemia vs. negative), (II) low contrast (0.00003% vs. negative) and (III) all concentrations (all positive levels vs. negative). The classifiers were validated with unseen datasets to detect malaria at various parasitaemia levels and anaemic conditions. Additionally, these classifiers were tested on samples from a population survey in malaria-endemic villages of southeastern Tanzania. Results: The AI classifiers attained over 90% accuracy in detecting malaria infections as low as one parasite per microlitre of blood, a sensitivity unattainable by conventional RDTs and microscopy. These laboratory-developed classifiers seamlessly transitioned to field applicability, achieving over 80% accuracy in predicting natural P. falciparum infections in blood samples collected during the field survey. Crucially, the performance remained unaffected by various levels of anaemia, a common complication in malaria patients. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the AI-driven mid-infrared spectroscopy approach holds promise as a simplified, sensitive and cost-effective method for malaria screening, consistently performing well despite variations in parasite densities and anaemic conditions. The technique simply involves scanning dried blood spots with a desktop mid-infrared scanner and analysing the spectra using pre-trained AI classifiers, making it readily adaptable to field conditions in low-resource settings. In this study, the approach was successfully adapted to field use, effectively predicting natural malaria infections in blood samples from a population-level survey in Tanzania. With additional field trials and validation, this technique could significantly enhance malaria surveillance and contribute to accelerating malaria elimination efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The consequences of declining population access to insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) on net use patterns and physical degradation of nets after 22 months of ownership
- Author
-
Mboma, Zawadi M., Festo, Charles, Lorenz, Lena M., Massue, Dennis J., Kisinza, William N., Bradley, John, Moore, Jason D., Mandike, Renata, Akim, Ikupa, Lines, Jo, Overgaard, Hans J., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Effect of interventions to reduce malaria incidence among military personnel on active duty: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the impact of etofenprox-treated uniforms, permethrin-treated uniforms and DEET insect repellent
- Author
-
Msellemu, Daniel, Ross, Amanda, Temu, Lucky, Moshi, Irene, Hofer, Lorenz, Mwanziva, Charles, Kohi, Yadon M., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Predicting the impact of outdoor vector control interventions on malaria transmission intensity from semi-field studies
- Author
-
Denz, Adrian, Njoroge, Margaret M., Tambwe, Mgeni M., Champagne, Clara, Okumu, Fredros, van Loon, Joop J. A., Hiscox, Alexandra, Saddler, Adam, Fillinger, Ulrike, Moore, Sarah J., and Chitnis, Nakul
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA® topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania
- Author
-
Mbuba, Emmanuel, Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Tenywa, Frank C., Philipo, Rose, Tambwe, Mgeni M., Swai, Johnson K., Moore, Jason D., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Household factors associated with access to insecticide-treated nets and house modification in Bagamoyo and Ulanga districts, Tanzania
- Author
-
Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Ross, Amanda, Mlacha, Yeromin P., Juma, Omary, Mmbaga, Selemani, Msellemu, Daniel, and Moore, Sarah
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors in Zanzibar and implications for malaria elimination efforts
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Msaky, Dickson, Kiware, Samson, Tarimo, Brian B., Moore, Sarah, Haji, Khamis, Koenker, Hannah, Harvey, Steven, Finda, Marceline, Ngowo, Halfan, Mihayo, Kimberly, Greer, George, Ali, Abdullah, and Okumu, Fredros
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Long-lasting insecticidal nets retain bio-efficacy after 5 years of storage: implications for malaria control programmes
- Author
-
Musa, Jeremiah J., Moore, Sarah J., Moore, Jason, Mbuba, Emmanuel, Mbeyela, Edgar, Kobe, Dickson, Swai, Johnson K., and Odufuwa, Olukayode G.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Can trials of spatial repellents be used to estimate mosquito movement?
- Author
-
Malinga, Josephine, Maia, Marta, Moore, Sarah, and Ross, Amanda
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Human behaviour and residual malaria transmission in Zanzibar: findings from in-depth interviews and direct observation of community events
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Mihayo, Kimberly, Okumu, Fredros, Finda, Marceline, Moore, Sarah, Koenker, Hannah, Lynch, Matthew, Haji, Khamis, Abbas, Faiza, Ali, Abdullah, Greer, George, and Harvey, Steven
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Life expectancy of Anopheles funestus is double that of Anopheles arabiensis in southeast Tanzania based on mark-release-recapture method.
- Author
-
Ntabaliba, Watson, Vavassori, Laura, Stica, Caleb, Makungwa, Noel, Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Swai, Johnson Kyeba, Lekundayo, Ruth, and Moore, Sarah
- Subjects
ANOPHELES arabiensis ,INSECTICIDE resistance ,LIFE expectancy ,ANOPHELES ,MOSQUITO vectors ,MALARIA ,MARK & recapture (Population biology) ,INSECT traps - Abstract
Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus sensu stricto mosquitoes are major East African malaria vectors. Understanding their dispersal and population structure is critical for developing effective malaria control tools. Three mark-release-recapture (MRR) experiments were conducted for 51 nights to assess daily survival and flight range of An. arabiensis and An. funestus mosquitoes in south-eastern, Tanzania. Mosquitoes were marked with a fluorescent dye as they emerged from breeding sites via a self-marking device. Mosquitoes were collected indoors and outdoors using human landing catches (HLC) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps (CDC-LT). In total, 4210 An. arabiensis and An. funestus were collected with 316 (7.5%) marked and recaptured (MR). Daily mean MR was 6.8, standard deviation (SD ± 7.6) for An. arabiensis and 8.9 (SD ± 8.3) for An. funestus. Probability of daily survival was 0.76 for An. arabiensis and 0.86 for An. funestus translating into average life expectancy of 3.6 days for An. arabiensis and 6.5 days for An. funestus. Dispersal distance was 654 m for An. arabiensis and 510 m for An. funestus. An. funestus life expectancy was substantially longer than that of An. arabiensis. The MRR method described here could be routinely utilized when evaluating the impact of new vector control tools on mosquito survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Hearing of malaria mosquitoes is modulated by a beta-adrenergic-like octopamine receptor which serves as insecticide target.
- Author
-
Georgiades, Marcos, Alampounti, Alexandros, Somers, Jason, Su, Matthew P., Ellis, David A., Bagi, Judit, Terrazas-Duque, Daniela, Tytheridge, Scott, Ntabaliba, Watson, Moore, Sarah, Albert, Joerg T., and Andrés, Marta
- Subjects
OCTOPAMINE ,MOSQUITOES ,MALARIA ,INSECTICIDES ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,INSECTICIDE resistance ,MOSQUITO control - Abstract
Malaria mosquitoes acoustically detect their mating partners within large swarms that form transiently at dusk. Indeed, male malaria mosquitoes preferably respond to female flight tones during swarm time. This phenomenon implies a sophisticated context- and time-dependent modulation of mosquito audition, the mechanisms of which are largely unknown. Using transcriptomics, we identify a complex network of candidate neuromodulators regulating mosquito hearing in the species Anopheles gambiae. Among them, octopamine stands out as an auditory modulator during swarm time. In-depth analysis of octopamine auditory function shows that it affects the mosquito ear on multiple levels: it modulates the tuning and stiffness of the flagellar sound receiver and controls the erection of antennal fibrillae. We show that two α- and β-adrenergic-like octopamine receptors drive octopamine's auditory roles and demonstrate that the octopaminergic auditory control system can be targeted by insecticides. Our findings highlight octopamine as key for mosquito hearing and mating partner detection and as a potential novel target for mosquito control. Malaria mosquitoes use their ears to detect the flight tones of mating partners in the swarm as part of the courtship ritual. Here, the authors describe the auditory role of octopamine as a modulator of auditory plasticity in malaria mosquitoes and identify the main receptors involved in this process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Modified World Health Organization (WHO) Tunnel Test for Higher Throughput Evaluation of Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) Considering the Effect of Alternative Hosts, Exposure Time, and Mosquito Density.
- Author
-
Kamande, Dismas S., Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Mbuba, Emmanuel, Hofer, Lorenz, and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,HIGH throughput screening (Drug development) ,MOSQUITOES ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,MALARIA ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,INSECTICIDE resistance - Abstract
Simple Summary: Membrane feeding assays have been widely used in malaria transmission research and insectary colony maintenance. Here, we investigate whether a membrane feeder can replace animal baits for evaluating insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) bio-efficacy in the World Health Organization (WHO) tunnel test. The effect of (1) alternative baits, (2) exposure time, and (3) mosquito density on the endpoints of mosquito mortality and feeding inhibition or feeding success was investigated. Our results show that similar mortality at 24-h (M24) or 72-h (M72) is estimated using either a membrane feeder or a rabbit bait with an overnight (12 h) exposure. However, the membrane measured higher blood feeding inhibition than the rabbit, likely due to the absence of host cues, notably carbon dioxide. Therefore, the membrane feeder may be used instead of an animal bait to test mortality endpoints in WHO tunnel tests and blood feeding rates need to be improved. Experimental results demonstrated that using 50 or 100 mosquitoes per replicate measure the same for mortality and feeding inhibition endpoints with an animal bait. Therefore, WHO tunnel tests may be run with lower mosquito densities. This will reduce strain on insectaries to produce sufficient mosquitoes to meet the large sample sizes needed for bio-efficacy durability monitoring of chlorfenapyr ITNs that must be evaluated in "free-flying" bioassays. The standard World Health Organization (WHO) tunnel test is a reliable laboratory bioassay used for "free-flying" testing of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) bio-efficacy where mosquitoes pass through a ITN sample to reach a live animal bait. Multiple parameters (i.e., bait, exposure time, and mosquito density) may affect the outcomes measured in tunnel tests. Therefore, a comparison was conducted of alternative hosts, exposure time, and lower mosquito density against the current gold standard test (100 mosquitoes, animal bait, and 12-h exposure) as outlined in the WHO ITN evaluation guideline. This was done with the aim to make the tunnel test cheaper and with higher throughput to meet the large sample sizes needed for bio-efficacy durability monitoring of chlorfenapyr ITNs that must be evaluated in "free-flying" bioassays. Methods: A series of experiments were conducted in the WHO tunnel test to evaluate the impact of the following factors on bio-efficacy endpoints of mosquito mortality at 24-h (M24) and 72-h (M72) and blood-feeding success (BFS): (1) baits (rabbit, membrane, human arm); (2) exposure time in the tunnel (1 h vs. 12 h); and (3) mosquito density (50 vs. 100). Finally, an alternative bioassay using a membrane with 50 mosquitoes (membrane-50) was compared to the gold standard bioassay (rabbit with 100 mosquitoes, rabbit-100). Pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis and pyrethroid susceptible Anopheles gambiae were used to evaluate Interceptor
® and Interceptor® G2 ITNs. Results: Using a human arm as bait gave a very different BFS, which impacted measurements of M24 and M72. The same trends in M24, M72 and BFS were observed for both Interceptor® ITN and Interceptor® G2 unwashed and washed 20 times measured using the gold standard WHO tunnel test (rabbit-100) or rabbit with 50 mosquitoes (rabbit-50). M24, M72 and BFS were not statistically different when either 50 or 100 mosquitoes were used with rabbit bait in the tunnel bioassay for either the susceptible or resistant strains. No systematic difference was observed between rabbit-50 and rabbit-100 in the agreement by the Bland and Altman method (B&A). The mean difference was 4.54% (−22.54–31.62) in BFS and 1.71% (−28.71–32.12) in M72 for rabbit-50 versus rabbit-100. Similar M24, M72 and lower BFS was measured by membrane-50 compared to rabbit-100. No systematic difference was observed in the agreement between membrane-50 and rabbit-100, by B&A. The mean difference was 9.06% (−11.42–29.64) for BSF and −5.44% (−50.3–39.45) for M72. Both membrane-50, rabbit-50 and rabbit-100 predicted the superiority of Interceptor® G2 over Interceptor® ITN for the resistant strain on M72. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that WHO tunnel tests using rabbit bait may be run with 50 mosquitoes to increase sample sizes needed for bio-efficacy durability monitoring of ITNs in "free-flying" bioassays. Using a membrane feeder with 50 mosquitoes is a potential replacement for the WHO tunnel bioassay with animal bait if control blood feeding rates can be improved to 50% because blood feeding impacts mosquito survival after exposure to insecticides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Strain Characterisation for Measuring Bioefficacy of ITNs Treated with Two Active Ingredients (Dual-AI ITNs): Developing a Robust Protocol by Building Consensus.
- Author
-
Lees, Rosemary S., Armistead, Jennifer S., Azizi, Salum, Constant, Edi, Fornadel, Christen, Gimnig, John E., Hemingway, Janet, Impoinvil, Daniel, Irish, Seth R., Kisinza, William, Lissenden, Natalie, Mawejje, Henry D., Messenger, Louisa A., Moore, Sarah, Ngufor, Corine, Oxborough, Richard, Protopopoff, Natacha, Ranson, Hilary, Small, Graham, and Wagman, Joseph
- Subjects
INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,INSECTICIDES ,MALARIA ,PYRETHROIDS ,MALARIA prevention - Abstract
Simple Summary: New types of bed nets are being developed which contain a pyrethroid plus a second chemical because of the development and increased frequency of mosquito mechanisms to avoid being killed by pyrethroids. When insecticide-treated bed nets are being trialed for efficacy or released onto the market it is essential to measure how effective the net is in killing mosquitoes, which includes testing how quickly insecticide is lost or degraded due to routine wear and tear. Pyrethroid-resistant mosquitoes are needed to test the effectiveness and insecticidal persistence of the second chemical, because they are not all killed by the pyrethroid, allowing the killing effect of the two chemicals to be evaluated independently. However, because resistance status varies between populations of mosquitoes that possess different resistance mechanisms, and because resistance intensity in a population can change over time, a method is needed to characterise the resistant mosquitoes. A focus group of experts discussed how this should best be done, considering pros and cons of different approaches, and co-wrote a protocol, which will be valuable for malaria control programmes and stakeholders wanting to test the effective lifespan of a new bed net in terms of the active ingredient bioefficacy. Durability monitoring of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) containing a pyrethroid in combination with a second active ingredient (AI) must be adapted so that the insecticidal bioefficacy of each AI can be monitored independently. An effective way to do this is to measure rapid knock down of a pyrethroid-susceptible strain of mosquitoes to assess the bioefficacy of the pyrethroid component and to use a pyrethroid-resistant strain to measure the bioefficacy of the second ingredient. To allow robust comparison of results across tests within and between test facilities, and over time, protocols for bioefficacy testing must include either characterisation of the resistant strain, standardisation of the mosquitoes used for bioassays, or a combination of the two. Through a series of virtual meetings, key stakeholders and practitioners explored different approaches to achieving these goals. Via an iterative process we decided on the preferred approach and produced a protocol consisting of characterising mosquitoes used for bioefficacy testing before and after a round of bioassays, for example at each time point in a durability monitoring study. We present the final protocol and justify our approach to establishing a standard methodology for durability monitoring of ITNs containing pyrethroid and a second AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Influence of testing modality on bioefficacy for the evaluation of Interceptor® G2 mosquito nets to combat malaria mosquitoes in Tanzania.
- Author
-
Kibondo, Ummi Abdul, Odufuwa, Olukayode G., Ngonyani, Saphina H., Mpelepele, Ahmadi B., Matanilla, Issaya, Ngonyani, Hassan, Makungwa, Noel O., Mseka, Antony P., Swai, Kyeba, Ntabaliba, Watson, Stutz, Susanne, Austin, James W., and Moore, Sarah Jane
- Subjects
MOSQUITO nets ,AEDES aegypti ,MOSQUITOES ,INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,INSECTICIDE resistance ,MALARIA - Abstract
Background: Insecticide-treated net (ITN) durability is evaluated using longitudinal bioefficacy and fabric integrity sampling post-distribution. Interceptor
® G2 was developed for resistance management and contains two adulticides: alpha-cypermethrin and chlorfenapyr; it is a pro-insecticide that is metabolized into its active form by mosquito-detoxifying enzymes and may be enhanced when the mosquito is physiologically active. To elucidate the impact of bioassay modality, mosquito exposures of the alphacypermethrin ITN Interceptor® and dual adulticide Interceptor® G2 were investigated. Methods: This study evaluated the performance of Interceptor® G2 compared to Interceptor® against local strains of mosquitoes in Tanzania. Unwashed and 20× times washed nets were tested. Efficacy of ITNs was measured by four bioassay types: (1) World Health Organisation (WHO) cone test (cone), (2) WHO tunnel test (tunnel), (3) Ifakara ambient chamber test (I-ACT) and (4) the WHO gold standard experimental hut test (hut). Hut tests were conducted against free-flying wild pyrethroid metabolically resistant Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus. Cone, tunnel and I-ACT bioassays used laboratory-reared metabolically resistant An. arabiensis and Cx. quinquefasciatus and pyrethroid susceptible Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Aedes aegypti. Results: Against resistant strains, superiority of Interceptor® G2 over Interceptor® was observed in all "free-flying bioassays". In cone tests (which restrict mosquito flight), superiority of Interceptor® over Interceptor® G2 was recorded. Mortality of unwashed Interceptor® G2 among An. arabiensis was lowest in hut tests at 42.9% (95% CI: 37.3–48.5), although this increased to 66.7% (95% CI: 47.1–86.3) by blocking hut exit traps so mosquitoes presumably increased frequencies of contact with ITNs. Higher odds of mortality were consistently observed in Interceptor® G2 compared to Interceptor® in "free-flying" bioassays using An. arabiensis: tunnel (OR = 1.42 [95% CI:1.19–1.70], p < 0.001), I-ACT (OR = 1.61 [95% CI: 1.05–2.49], p = 0.031) and hut (OR = 2.53 [95% CI: 1.96–3.26], p < 0.001). Interceptor® and Interceptor® G2 showed high blood-feeding inhibition against all strains. Conclusion: Both free-flying laboratory bioassays (WHO Tunnel and I-ACT) consistently measured similarly, and both predicted the results of the experimental hut test. For bioefficacy monitoring and upstream product evaluation of ITNs in situ, the I-ACT may provide an alternative bioassay modality with improved statistical power. Interceptor G2® outperformed Interceptor® against pyrethroid-resistant strains, demonstrating the usefulness of chlorfenapyr in mitigation of malaria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Multi-site comparison of factors influencing progress of African insecticide testing facilities towards an international Quality Management System certification.
- Author
-
Begg, Sara, Wright, Alex, Small, Graham, Kirby, Matt, Moore, Sarah, Koudou, Ben, Kisinza, William, Abdoulaye, Diabate, Moore, Jason, Malima, Robert, Kija, Patrick, Mosha, Frank, Edi, Constant, and Bates, Imelda
- Subjects
TOTAL quality management ,TESTING laboratories ,MALARIA prevention ,MOSQUITO vectors ,VECTOR control ,MALARIA ,INSECTICIDES - Abstract
Background: Insecticidal mosquito vector control products are vital components of malaria control programmes. Test facilities are key in assessing the effectiveness of vector control products against local mosquito populations, in environments where they will be used. Data from these test facilities must be of a high quality to be accepted by regulatory authorities, including the WHO Prequalification Team for vector control products. In 2013–4, seven insecticide testing facilities across sub-Saharan Africa, with technical and financial support from Innovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), began development and implementation of quality management system compliant with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) to improve data quality and reliability. Methods and principle findings: We conducted semi-structured interviews, emails, and video-call interviews with individuals at five test facilities engaged in the IVCC-supported programme and working towards or having achieved GLP. We used framework analysis to identify and describe factors affeting progress towards GLP. We found that eight factors were instrumental in progress, and that test facilities had varying levels of control over these factors. They had high control over the training programme, project planning, and senior leadership support; medium control over infrastructure development, staff structure, and procurement; and low control over funding the availability and accessibility of relevant expertise. Collaboration with IVCC and other partners was key to overcoming the challenges associated with low and medium control factors. Conclusion: For partnership and consortia models of research capacity strengthening, test facilities can use their own internal resources to address identified high-control factors. Project plans should allow additional time for interaction with external agencies to address medium-control factors, and partners with access to expertise and funding should concentrate their efforts on supporting institutions to address low-control factors. In practice, this includes planning for financial sustainability at the outset, and acting to strengthen national and regional training capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Evaluating putative repellent 'push' and attractive 'pull' components for manipulating the odour orientation of host-seeking malaria vectors in the peri-domestic space.
- Author
-
Njoroge, Margaret Mendi, Fillinger, Ulrike, Saddler, Adam, Moore, Sarah, Takken, Willem, van Loon, Joop J. A., and Hiscox, Alexandra
- Subjects
VECTOR spaces ,REPELLENTS ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,MALARIA prevention ,HUMAN beings ,MALARIA ,MOSQUITO vectors - Abstract
Background: Novel malaria vector control approaches aim to combine tools for maximum protection. This study aimed to evaluate novel and re-evaluate existing putative repellent 'push' and attractive 'pull' components for manipulating the odour orientation of malaria vectors in the peri-domestic space. Methods: Anopheles arabiensis outdoor human landing catches and trap comparisons were implemented in large semi-field systems to (i) test the efficacy of Citriodiol
® or transfluthrin-treated fabric strips positioned in house eave gaps as push components for preventing bites; (ii) understand the efficacy of MB5-baited Suna-traps in attracting vectors in the presence of a human being; (iii) assess 2-butanone as a CO2 replacement for trapping; (iv) determine the protection provided by a full push-pull set up. The air concentrations of the chemical constituents of the push–pull set-up were quantified. Results: Microencapsulated Citriodiol® eave strips did not provide outdoor protection against host-seeking An. arabiensis. Transfluthrin-treated strips reduced the odds of a mosquito landing on the human volunteer (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.12–0.23). This impact was lower (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.52–0.66) during the push-pull experiment, which was associated with low nighttime temperatures likely affecting the transfluthrin vaporisation. The MB5-baited Suna trap supplemented with CO2 attracted only a third of the released mosquitoes in the absence of a human being; however, with a human volunteer in the same system, the trap caught < 1% of all released mosquitoes. The volunteer consistently attracted over two-thirds of all mosquitoes released. This was the case in the absence ('pull' only) and in the presence of a spatial repellent ('push-pull'), indicating that in its current configuration the tested 'pull' does not provide a valuable addition to a spatial repellent. The chemical 2-butanone was ineffective in replacing CO2 . Transfluthrin was detectable in the air space but with a strong linear reduction in concentrations over 5 m from release. The MB5 constituent chemicals were only irregularly detected, potentially suggesting insufficient release and concentration in the air for attraction. Conclusion: This step-by-step evaluation of the selected 'push' and 'pull' components led to a better understanding of their ability to affect host-seeking behaviours of the malaria vector An. arabiensis in the peri-domestic space and helps to gauge the impact such tools would have when used in the field for monitoring or control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Repellents and New 'Spaces of Concern' in Global Health
- Author
-
Kelly, Ann H., Koudakossi, Hermione N. Boko, and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
Insecticides ,Mosquito Control ,Anthropology, Medical ,fungi ,domestic space ,global health innovation ,malaria ,vector control ,Articles ,vector-control ,Global Health ,Article ,United States ,resistance ,South Africa ,parasitic diseases ,Animals ,Humans ,Insecticide-Treated Bednets ,Domestic space - Abstract
Today, malaria prevention hinges upon two domestic interventions: insecticide-treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying. As mosquitoes grow resistant to these tools, however, novel approaches to vector control have become a priority area of malaria research and development. Spatial repellency, a volumetric mode of action that seeks to reduce disease transmission by creating an atmosphere inimical to mosquitoes, represents one way forward. Drawing from research that sought to develop new repellent chemicals in conversation with users from sub-Saharan Africa and the United States, we consider the implications of a non-insecticidal paradigm of vector control for how we understand the political ecology of malaria.
- Published
- 2017
27. Methods and indicators for measuring patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors.
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Moore, Sarah, Okumu, Fredros, Kiware, Samson, Lobo, Neil F., Koenker, Hannah, Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Gimnig, John, and Killeen, Gerry F.
- Subjects
- *
MALARIA , *POPULATION , *VECTOR control , *PERSONAL belongings , *ANOPHELES - Abstract
Background: Effective targeting and evaluation of interventions that protect against adult malaria vectors requires an understanding of how gaps in personal protection arise. An improved understanding of human and mosquito behaviour, and how they overlap in time and space, is critical to estimating the impact of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and determining when and where supplemental personal protection tools are needed. Methods for weighting estimates of human exposure to biting Anopheles mosquitoes according to where people spend their time were first developed over half a century ago. However, crude indoor and outdoor biting rates are still commonly interpreted as indicative of human-vector contact patterns without any adjustment for human behaviour or the personal protection effects of ITNs. Main text: A small number of human behavioural variables capturing the distribution of human populations indoors and outdoors, whether they are awake or asleep, and if and when they use an ITN over the course of the night, can enable a more accurate representation of human biting exposure patterns. However, to date no clear guidance is available on what data should be collected, what indicators should be reported, or how they should be calculated. This article presents an integrated perspective on relevant indicators of human-vector interactions, the critical entomological and human behavioural data elements required to quantify human-vector interactions, and recommendations for collecting and analysing such data. Conclusions: If collected and used consistently, this information can contribute to an improved understanding of how malaria transmission persists in the context of current intervention tools, how exposure patterns may change as new vector control tools are introduced, and the potential impact and limitations of these tools. This article is intended to consolidate understanding around work on this topic to date and provide a consistent framework for building upon it. Additional work is needed to address remaining questions, including further development and validation of methods for entomological and human behavioural data collection and analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. The development and evaluation of a self-marking unit to estimate malaria vector survival and dispersal distance.
- Author
-
Saddler, Adam, Kreppel, Katharina S., Chitnis, Nakul, Smith, Thomas A., Denz, Adrian, Moore, Jason D., Tambwe, Mgeni M., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,MALARIA ,COUMARINS ,DISEASE vectors ,CULEX - Abstract
Background: A clear understanding of mosquito biology is fundamental to the control efforts of mosquito-borne diseases such as malaria. Mosquito mark-release-recapture (MMRR) experiments are a popular method of measuring the survival and dispersal of disease vectors; however, examples with African malaria vectors are limited. Ethical and technical difficulties involved in carrying out MMRR studies may have held back research in this area and, therefore, a device that marks mosquitoes as they emerge from breeding sites was developed and evaluated to overcome the problems of MMRR. Methods: A modified self-marking unit that marks mosquitoes with fluorescent pigment as they emerge from their breeding site was developed based on a previous design for Culex mosquitoes. The self-marking unit was first evaluated under semi-field conditions with laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis to determine the marking success and impact on mosquito survival. Subsequently, a field evaluation of MMRR was conducted in Yombo village, Tanzania, to examine the feasibility of the system. Results: During the semi-field evaluation the self-marking units successfully marked 86% of emerging mosquitoes and there was no effect of fluorescent marker on mosquito survival. The unit successfully marked wild male and female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) in sufficiently large numbers to justify its use in MMRR studies. The estimated daily survival probability of An. gambiae s.l. was 0.87 (95% CI 0.69–1.10) and mean dispersal distance was 579 m (95% CI 521–636 m). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the successful use of a self-marking device in an MMRR study with African malaria vectors. This method may be useful in investigating population structure and dispersal of mosquitoes for deployment and evaluation of future vector control tools, such as gene drive, and to better parameterize mathematical models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Mosquito feeding behavior and how it influences residual malaria transmission across Africa.
- Author
-
Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Skarp, Janetta E., Beale, Andrew D., Fornadel, Christen, Norris, Laura C., Moore, Sarah J., Mihreteab, Selam, Charlwood, Jacques Derek, Bhatt, Samir, Winskill, Peter, Griffin, Jamie T., and Churcher, Thomas S.
- Subjects
MALARIA ,MOSQUITOES ,HUMAN behavior ,VECTOR control ,META-analysis - Abstract
The antimalarial efficacy of the most important vector control interventions--long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS)--primarily protect against mosquitoes' biting people when they are in bed and indoors. Mosquito bites taken outside of these times contribute to residual transmission which determines the maximum effectiveness of current malaria prevention. The likelihood mosquitoes feed outside the time of day when LLINs and IRS can protect people is poorly understood, and the proportion of bites received outdoors may be higher after prolonged vector control. A systematic review of mosquito and human behavior is used to quantify and estimate the public health impact of outdoor biting across Africa. On average 79% of bites by the major malaria vectors occur during the time when people are in bed. This estimate is substantially lower than previous predictions, with results suggesting a nearly 10% lower proportion of bites taken at the time when people are beneath LLINs since the year 2000. Across Africa, this higher outdoor transmission is predicted to result in an estimated 10.6 million additional malaria cases annually if universal LLIN and IRS coverage was achieved. Higher outdoor biting diminishes the cases of malaria averted by vector control. This reduction in LLIN effectiveness appears to be exacerbated in areas where mosquito populations are resistant to insecticides used in bed nets, but no association was found between physiological resistance and outdoor biting. Substantial spatial heterogeneity in mosquito biting behavior between communities could contribute to differences in effectiveness of malaria control across Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Correction: Methods and indicators for measuring patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors.
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Moore, Sarah, Okumu, Fredros, Kiware, Samson, Lobo, Neil F., Koenker, Hannah, Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Gimnig, John, and Killeen, Gerry F.
- Subjects
- *
MALARIA , *HUMAN beings , *APOLOGIZING , *MEASUREMENT - Abstract
Methods and indicators for measuring patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors. B Correction: Malaria J (2020) 19:207 b https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03271-z Following publication of the article [[1]], the authors flagged that there were some minor errors in the formulas of Additional file 1. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Multiple insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae from Tanzania: a major concern for malaria vector control.
- Author
-
Kisinza, William N., Nkya, Theresia E., Kabula, Bilali, Overgaard, Hans J., Massue, Dennis J., Mageni, Zawadi, Greer, George, Kaspar, Naomi, Mohamed, Mahdi, Reithinger, Richard, Moore, Sarah, Lorenz, Lena M., and Magesa, Stephen
- Subjects
INSECTICIDE resistance ,ANOPHELES ,PYRETHROIDS ,DELTAMETHRIN ,MOSQUITO vectors - Abstract
Background: Malaria vector control in Tanzania is based on use of long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), which both rely on the use of chemical insecticides. The effectiveness of these control tools is endangered by the development of insecticide resistance in the major malaria vectors. This study was carried out to monitor the susceptibility status of major malaria vectors to insecticides used for IRS and LLINs in mainland Tanzania. Methods: Mosquito larvae were collected in 20 sites of Tanzania mainland in 2015. Phenotypic resistance was determined using standard WHO susceptibility tests. Molecular assay were used to determine distribution of Anopheles gambiae sub-species. A microplate assay approach was used for identifying enzyme levels on single mosquitoes from each sites compared with a susceptible reference strain, An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) Kisumu strain. Results: Anopheles arabiensis was the dominant malaria specie in the country, accounting for 52% of the sibling species identified, while An. gambiae s.s. represented 48%. In Arumeru site, the dominant species was An. arabiensis, which was resistant to both pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin), and pirimiphos-methyl, and had significant elevated levels of GSTs, non-specific esterases, and oxidase enzymes. An. arabiensis was also a dominant species in Kilombero and Kondoa sites, both were resistant to permethrin and deltamethrin with significant activity levels of oxidase enzymes. Resistance to bendiocarb was recorded in Ngara site where specie composition is evenly distributed between An. gambiae s.s. and An.arabiensis. Also bendiocarb resistance was recorded in Mbozi site, where An. gambiae s.s. is the dominant species. Conclusions: Overall, this study confirmed resistance to all four insecticide classes in An. gambiae sensu lato in selected locations in Tanzania. Results are discussed in relation to resistance mechanisms and the optimization of resistance management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. A crossover study to evaluate the diversion of malaria vectors in a community with incomplete coverage of spatial repellents in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania.
- Author
-
Maia, Marta Ferreira, Kreppel, Katharina, Mbeyela, Edgar, Roman, Deogratius, Mayagaya, Valeriana, Lobo, Neil F., Ross, Amanda, and Moore, Sarah Jane
- Subjects
MALARIA ,MOSQUITO vectors ,MOSQUITO control ,INSECT baits & repellents - Abstract
Background: Malaria elimination is unlikely to occur if vector control efforts focus entirely on transmission occurring indoors without addressing vectors that bite outdoors and outside sleeping hours. Additional control tools such as spatial repellents may provide the personal protection required to fill this gap. However, since repellents do not kill mosquitoes it is unclear if vectors will be diverted from households that use spatial repellents to those that do not. Methods: A crossover study was performed over 24 weeks in Kilombero, Tanzania. The density of resting and blood-engorged mosquitoes and human blood index (HBI) of malaria vector species per household was measured among 90 households using or not using 0.03 % transfluthrin coils burned outdoors under three coverage scenarios: (i) no coverage (blank coils); (ii) complete coverage of repellent coils; and (iii) incomplete coverage of repellent and blank coils. Mosquitoes were collected three days a week for 24 weeks from the inside and outside of all participating households using mosquito aspirators. Paired indoor and outdoor human landing collections were performed in three random households for six consecutive nights to confirm repellent efficacy of the coils and local vector biting times. Results: The main vectors were Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus (sensu stricto), which fed outdoors, outside sleeping hours, on humans as well as animals. Anopheles arabiensis landings were reduced by 80 % by the spatial repellent although household densities were not reduced. The HBI for An. arabiensis was significantly higher among households without repellents in the incomplete coverage scenario compared to houses in the no coverage scenario (Odds ratio 1.71; 95 % CI: 1.04-2.83; P = 0.03). This indicated that An. arabiensis mosquitoes seeking a human blood meal were diverted from repellent users to non-users. The repellent coils did not affect An. funestus densities or HBI. Conclusions: Substantial malaria vector activity is occurring outside sleeping hours in the Kilombero valley. Repellent coils provided some protection against local An. arabiensis but did not protect against local (and potentially pyrethroid-resistant) An. funestus. Pyrethroid-based spatial repellents may offer a degree of personal protection, however the overall public health benefit is doubtful and potentially iniquitous as their use may divert malaria vectors to those who do not use them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Comparative performance of three experimental hut designs for measuring malaria vector responses to insecticides in Tanzania.
- Author
-
Massue, Dennis J., Kisinza, William N., Malongo, Bernard B., Mgaya, Charles S., Bradley, John, Moore, Jason D., Tenu, Filemoni F., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
INSECTICIDE application ,MALARIA prevention equipment ,HUTS ,PESTICIDE monitoring ,APPLICATION of pesticides ,BUILDING design & construction - Abstract
Background: Experimental huts are simplified, standardized representations of human habitations that provide model systems to evaluate insecticides used in indoor residual spray (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to kill disease vectors. Hut volume, construction materials and size of entry points impact mosquito entry and exposure to insecticides. The performance of three standard experimental hut designs was compared to evaluate insecticide used in LLINs. Methods: Field studies were conducted at the World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES) testing site in Muheza, Tanzania. Three East African huts, three West African huts, and three Ifakara huts were compared using Olyset
® and Permanet 2.0® versus untreated nets as a control. Outcomes measured were mortality, induced exophily (exit rate), blood feeding inhibition and deterrence (entry rate). Data were analysed using linear mixed effect regression and Bland-Altman comparison of paired differences. Results: A total of 613 mosquitoes were collected in 36 nights, of which 13.5 % were Anopheles gambiae sensu lato, 21 % Anopheles funestus sensu stricto, 38 % Mansonia species and 28 % Culex species. Ifakara huts caught three times more mosquitoes than the East African and West African huts, while the West African huts caught significantly fewer mosquitoes than the other hut types. Mosquito densities were low, very little mosquito exit was measured in any of the huts with no measurable exophily caused by the use of either Olyset or Permanet. When the huts were directly compared, the West African huts measured greater exophily than other huts. As unholed nets were used in the experiments and few mosquitoes were captured, it was not possible to measure difference in feeding success either between treatments or hut types. In each of the hut types there was increased mortality when Permanet or Olyset were present inside the huts compared to the control, however this did not vary between the hut types. Conclusions: Both East African and Ifakara huts performed in a similar way although Ifakara huts allowed more mosquitoes to enter, increasing data power. The work convincingly demonstrates that the East African huts and Ifakara huts collect substantially more mosquitoes than the West African huts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Combining Synthetic Human Odours and Low-Cost Electrocuting Grids to Attract and Kill Outdoor-Biting Mosquitoes: Field and Semi-Field Evaluation of an Improved Mosquito Landing Box.
- Author
-
Matowo, Nancy S., Koekemoer, Lizette L., Moore, Sarah J., Mmbando, Arnold S., Mapua, Salum A., Coetzee, Maureen, and Okumu, Fredros O.
- Subjects
COST analysis ,INSECT bites & stings ,ELECTRIC power distribution grids ,MALARIA ,DISEASE vectors - Abstract
Background: On-going malaria transmission is increasingly mediated by outdoor-biting vectors, especially where indoor insecticidal interventions such as long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) are widespread. Often, the vectors are also physiologically resistant to insecticides, presenting major obstacles for elimination. We tested a combination of electrocuting grids with synthetic odours as an alternative killing mechanism against outdoor-biting mosquitoes. Methods: An odour-baited device, the Mosquito Landing Box (MLB), was improved by fitting it with low-cost electrocuting grids to instantly kill mosquitoes attracted to the odour lure, and automated photo switch to activate attractant-dispensing and mosquito-killing systems between dusk and dawn. MLBs fitted with one, two or three electrocuting grids were compared outdoors in a malaria endemic village in Tanzania, where vectors had lost susceptibility to pyrethroids. MLBs with three grids were also tested in a large semi-field cage (9.6×9.6×4.5m), to assess effects on biting-densities of laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis on volunteers sitting near MLBs. Results: Significantly more mosquitoes were killed when MLBs had two or three grids, than one grid in wet and dry seasons (P<0.05). The MLBs were highly efficient against Mansonia species and malaria vector, An. arabiensis. Of all mosquitoes, 99% were non-blood fed, suggesting host-seeking status. In the semi-field, the MLBs reduced mean number of malaria mosquitoes attempting to bite humans fourfold. Conclusion: The improved odour-baited MLBs effectively kill outdoor-biting malaria vector mosquitoes that are behaviourally and physiologically resistant to insecticidal interventions e.g. LLINs. The MLBs reduce human-biting vector densities even when used close to humans, and are insecticide-free, hence potentially antiresistance. The devices could either be used as surveillance tools or complementary mosquito control interventions to accelerate malaria elimination where outdoor transmission is significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Evaluating preservation methods for identifying Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis complex mosquitoes species using near infra-red spectroscopy.
- Author
-
Simon Mayagaya, Valeriana, Ntamatungiro, Alex John, Moore, Sarah Jane, Wirtz, Robert Andrew, Dowell, Floyd Ercell, and Ferreira Maia, Marta
- Subjects
INFRARED spectroscopy ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,MALARIA ,RNA - Abstract
Background Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been successfully used on fresh and RNAlater®-preserved members of the Anopheles gambiae complex to identify sibling species and age. No preservation methods other than using RNAlater® have been tested to preserve mosquitoes for species identification using NIRS. However, RNAlater® is not the most practical preservative for field settings because it is expensive, requires basic laboratory conditions for storage and is not widely available in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to test several cheaper and more field-friendly preservation methods for identifying sibling species of the An. gambiae complex using NIRS. Methods In this study we describe the use of NIRS to identify sibling species of preserved An. gambiae s. s. and An. arabiensis. Mosquitoes of each species were placed in sample tubes and preserved using one of the following preservation methods: (i) refrigeration at 4°C, (ii) freezing at -20°C, (iii) drying over a silica-gel desiccant, (iv) submersion in RNAlater® at room temperature, (v) submersion in RNAlater® at 4°C, and (vi) submersion in RNAlater® at -20°C. Mosquitoes were preserved for 1, 4, 10, 32 or 50 weeks before they were scanned. Results Storage at 4°C was the only preservation method that, up to 32 weeks, did not result in significantly lower predicted values than those obtained from fresh insects. After 50 weeks, however, refrigerated samples did not give meaningful results. When storing for 50 weeks, desiccating samples over silica gel was the best preservation method, with a partial least squares regression cross-validation of >80%. Predictive data values were analyzed using a generalized linear model. Conclusion NIRS can be used to identify species of desiccated Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis for up to 50 weeks of storage with more than 80% accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Experimental hut evaluation of linalool spatial repellent agar gel against Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto mosquitoes in a semi-field system in Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
- Author
-
Mohamed Tambwe, Mgeni, Mtaki Mbeyela, Edgar, Migamyo Massinda, Brian, Moore, Sarah Jane, and Maia, Marta Ferreira
- Subjects
MALARIA prevention ,MALARIA ,MOSQUITO control equipment ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,EVALUATION utilization ,TERPENE alcohols ,DISEASE vectors ,INFECTIOUS disease transmission - Abstract
Background Malaria vector control is in need of new tools to face its current challenges such as the spread of pyrethroid-resistance and the increase of outdoor feeding mosquitoes. New strategies such as spatial repellents need to be evaluated as supplemental tools to existing control measures such as insecticide treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying. Linalool is a naturally occurring terpene alcohol commonly found in flowers and spices with reportedly repellent properties. Methods Four experimental huts fitted with exit traps and enclosed inside a large screened semi-field system were used for the evaluation. The tested spatial repellent product consisted of an agar gel emanator containing 73% linalool. Two rounds of experiments using a Latin square design were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the linalool emanators compared to no treatment (negative control) and a transfluthrin coil (positive) against lab-reared disease free Anopheles gambiae s.s.. The emanators were hung inside experimental huts where two volunteers were sleeping unprotected. The outcome measures were repellency, % feeding inhibition, %mortality and post 24 h % mortality. Results Unlike the mosquito coil, the linalool emanators did not show any feeding inhibition, repellency or induced mortality compared to the negative control. On the other hand mosquitoes kept for 24 h post exposure were 3 times more likely to die after being exposed to two 73% linalool emanators than the negative control. Conclusions Our results indicate that linalool agar gel emanators are not adequate as a spatial repellent against Anopheles gambiae s.s.. However adding linalool to known repellent formulations could be advantageous, not only because of its pleasant scent but also because of the delayed mortality effect it has on mosquitoes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Feasibility of repellent use in a context of increasing outdoor transmission: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania.
- Author
-
Sangoro, Onyango, Kelly, Ann H., Mtali, Sarah, and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
INSECT baits & repellents ,MALARIA transmission ,INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,RURAL geography ,MOSQUITO vectors - Abstract
Background: Extensive employment of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has substantially reduced malaria morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. These tools target indoor resting and biting vectors, and may select for vectors that bite and rest outdoors. Thus, to significantly impact this residual malaria transmission outdoors, tools targeting outdoor transmission are required. Repellents, used for personal protection, offer one solution. However, the effectiveness of this method hinges upon its community acceptability. This study assessed the feasibility of using repellents as a malaria prevention tool in Mbingu village, Ulanga, Southern Tanzania. Methodology: Change in knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in relation to repellent use was assessed before and after the implementation of a cluster randomized clinical trial on topical repellents in rural Tanzania where repellent and placebo lotion were provided free of charge to 940 households for a period of 14 months between July 2009 and August 2010. Compliance, defined as the number of evenings that participants applied the recommended dose of repellent every month during the study period, was assessed using questionnaires, administered monthly during follow up of participants in the clinical trial. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in the same community three years later to assess the community's KAP in relation to repellents and preference to different repellent formats. Results: At baseline, only 0.32% (n = 2) households in the intervention arm and no households in the control arm had ever used topical repellents. During follow-up surveys, significantly more households, 100% (n = 457) in intervention arm relative to the control, 84.03% (n = 379), (p = <0.001) perceived the repellent to be effective. Post-study, 99.78% (n = 462) and 99.78% (n = 463), (p = 0.999) in the intervention and control arms respectively, were willing to continue repellent use. Mosquito nuisance motivated repellent use. From the FGDs, it emerged that most respondents preferred bed nets to repellents because of their longevity and cost effectiveness. Conclusion: High repellent acceptability indicates their feasibility for malaria control in this community. However, to improve the community's uptake of repellents for use complimentary to LLINs for early evening and outdoor protection from mosquito bites, longer lasting and cheap formats are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Use of a semi-field system to evaluate the efficacy of topical repellents under user conditions provides a disease exposure free technique comparable with field data.
- Author
-
Sangoro, Onyango, Lweitojera, Dickson, Simfukwe, Emmanuel, Ngonyani, Hassan, Mbeyela, Edgar, Lugiko, Daniel, Kihonda, Japhet, Maia, Marta, and Moore, Sarah
- Subjects
ARTHROPODA ,MOSQUITOES ,BITES & stings ,TOLUAMIDES ,ANOPHELES arabiensis ,MALARIA - Abstract
Background Before topical repellents can be employed as interventions against arthropod bites, their efficacy must be established. Currently, laboratory or field tests, using human volunteers, are the main methods used for assessing the efficacy of topical repellents. However, laboratory tests are not representative of real life conditions under which repellents are used and fieldtesting potentially exposes human volunteers to disease. There is, therefore, a need to develop methods to test efficacy of repellents under real life conditions while minimizing volunteer exposure to disease. Methods A lotion-based, 15% N, N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) repellent and 15% DEET in ethanol were compared to a placebo lotion in a 200 sq m (10 m × 20 m) semi-field system (SFS) against laboratory-reared Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes and in full field settings against wild malaria vectors and nuisance-biting mosquitoes. The average percentage protection against biting mosquitoes over four hours in the SFS and field setting was determined. A Poisson regression model was then used to determine relative risk of being bitten when wearing either of these repellents compared to the placebo. Results Average percentage protection of the lotion-based 15% DEET repellent after four hours of mosquito collection was 82.13% (95% CI 75.94-88.82) in the semi-field experiments and 85.10% (95% CI 78.97-91.70) in the field experiments. Average percentage protection of 15% DEET in ethanol after four hours was 71.29% (CI 61.77-82.28) in the semi-field system and 88.24% (84.45-92.20) in the field. Conclusions Semi-field evaluation results were comparable to full-field evaluations, indicating that such systems could be satisfactorily used in measuring efficacy of topically applied mosquito repellents, thereby avoiding risks of exposure to mosquito-borne pathogens, associated with field testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Taxis assays measure directional movement of mosquitoes to olfactory cues.
- Author
-
Lorenz, Lena M., Keane, Aidan, Moore, Jason D., Munk, Cristina J., Seeholzer, Laura, Mseka, Antony, Simfukwe, Emmanuel, Ligamba, Joseph, Turner, Elizabeth L., Biswaro, Lubandwa R., Okumu, Fredros O., Killeen, Gerry F., Mukabana, Wolfgang R., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
MOSQUITO vectors ,MALARIA transmission ,DISEASE vectors ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,CARBOXYLIC acids ,ARTHROPODA - Abstract
Background: Malaria control methods targeting indoor-biting mosquitoes have limited impact on vectors that feed and rest outdoors. Exploiting mosquito olfactory behaviour to reduce blood-feeding outdoors might be a sustainable approach to complement existing control strategies. Methodologies that can objectively quantify responses to odour under realistic field conditions and allow high-throughput screening of many compounds are required for development of effective odour-based control strategies. Methods: The olfactory responses of laboratory-reared Anopheles gambiae in a semi-field tunnel and A. arabiensis females in an outdoor field setting to three stimuli, namely whole human odour, a synthetic blend of carboxylic acids plus carbon dioxide and CO
2 alone at four distances up to 100 metres were measured in two experiments using three-chambered taxis boxes that allow mosquito responses to natural or experimentally-introduced odour cues to be quantified. Results: Taxis box assays could detect both activation of flight and directional mosquito movement. Significantly more (6-18%) A. arabiensis mosquitoes were attracted to natural human odour in the field up to 30 metres compared to controls, and blended synthetic human odours attracted 20% more A. gambiae in the semi-field tunnel up to 70 metres. Whereas CO2 elicited no response in A. arabiensis in the open field, it was attractive to A. gambiae up to 50 metres (65% attraction compared to 36% in controls). Conclusions: We have developed a simple reproducible system to allow for the comparison of compounds that are active over medium- to long-ranges in semi-field or full-field environments. Knowing the natural range of attraction of anopheline mosquitoes to potential blood sources has substantial implications for the design of malaria control strategies, and adds to the understanding of olfactory behaviour in mosquitoes. This experimental strategy could also be extended from malaria vectors to other motile arthropods of medical, veterinary and agricultural significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Mathematical evaluation of community level impact of combining bed nets and indoor residual spraying upon malaria transmission in areas where the main vectors are Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes.
- Author
-
Okumu, Fredros O., Kiware, Samson S., Moore, Sarah J., and Killeen, Gerry F.
- Subjects
ANOPHELES arabiensis ,MOSQUITOES ,MALARIA ,INFECTIOUS disease transmission ,INSECTICIDES ,PARAMETERIZATION - Abstract
Background: Indoor residual insecticide spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) are commonly used together even though evidence that such combinations confer greater protection against malaria than either method alone is inconsistent. Methods: A deterministic model of mosquito life cycle processes was adapted to allow parameterization with results from experimental hut trials of various combinations of untreated nets or LLINs (Olyset®, PermaNet 2.0®, Icon Life® nets) with IRS (pirimiphos methyl, lambda cyhalothrin, DDT), in a setting where vector populations are dominated by Anopheles arabiensis, so that community level impact upon malaria transmission at high coverage could be predicted. Results: Intact untreated nets alone provide equivalent personal protection to all three LLINs. Relative to IRS plus untreated nets, community level protection is slightly higher when Olyset® or PermaNet 2.0® nets are added onto IRS with pirimiphos methyl or lambda cyhalothrin but not DDT, and when Icon LifeW nets supplement any of the IRS insecticides. Adding IRS onto any net modestly enhances communal protection when pirimiphos methyl is sprayed, while spraying lambda cyhalothrin enhances protection for untreated nets but not LLINs. Addition of DDT reduces communal protection when added to LLINs. Conclusions: Where transmission is mediated primarily by An. arabiensis, adding IRS to high LLIN coverage provides only modest incremental benefit (e.g. when an organophosphate like pirimiphos methyl is used), but can be redundant (e.g. when a pyrethroid like lambda cyhalothin is used) or even regressive (e.g. when DDT is used for the IRS). Relative to IRS plus untreated nets, supplementing IRS with LLINs will only modestly improve community protection. Beyond the physical protection that intact nets provide, additional protection against transmission by An. arabiensis conferred by insecticides will be remarkably small, regardless of whether they are delivered as LLINs or IRS. The insecticidal action of LLINs and IRS probably already approaches their absolute limit of potential impact upon this persistent vector so personal protection of nets should be enhanced by improving the physical integrity and durability. Combining LLINs and non-pyrethroid IRS in residual transmission systems may nevertheless be justified as a means to manage insecticide resistance and prevent potential rebound of not only An. arabiensis, but also more potent, vulnerable and historically important species such as Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Screening Mosquito House Entry Points as a Potential Method for Integrated Control of Endophagic Filariasis, Arbovirus and Malaria Vectors.
- Author
-
Ogoma, Sheila B., Lweitoijera, Dickson W., Ngonyani, Hassan, Furer, Benjamin, Russell, Tanya L., Mukabana, Wolfgang R., Killeen, Gerry F., and Moore, Sarah J.
- Subjects
MEDICAL screening ,RIFT Valley fever ,FILARIASIS ,NEGLECTED diseases ,MALARIA - Abstract
Background: Partial mosquito-proofing of houses with screens and ceilings has the potential to reduce indoor densities of malaria mosquitoes. We wish to measure whether it will also reduce indoor densities of vectors of neglected tropical diseases. Methodology: The main house entry points preferred by anopheline and culicine vectors were determined through controlled experiments using specially designed experimental huts and village houses in Lupiro village, southern Tanzania. The benefit of screening different entry points (eaves, windows and doors) using PVC-coated fibre glass netting material in terms of reduced indoor densities of mosquitoes was evaluated compared to the control. Findings: 23,027 mosquitoes were caught with CDC light traps; 77.9% (17,929) were Anopheles gambiae sensu lato, of which 66.2% were An. arabiensis and 33.8% An. gambiae sensu stricto. The remainder comprised 0.2% (50) An. funestus, 10.2% (2359) Culex spp. and 11.6% (2664) Mansonia spp. Screening eaves reduced densities of Anopheles gambiae s. l. (Relative ratio (RR) = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.84, 0.98; P = 0.01); Mansonia africana (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.26, 0.76; P<0.001) and Mansonia uniformis (RR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.25, 0.56; P<0.001) but not Culex quinquefasciatus, Cx. univittatus or Cx. theileri. Numbers of these species were reduced by screening windows and doors but this was not significant. Significance: This study confirms that across Africa, screening eaves protects households against important mosquito vectors of filariasis, Rift Valley Fever and O'Nyong nyong as well as malaria. While full house screening is required to exclude Culex species mosquitoes, screening of eaves alone or fitting ceilings has considerable potential for integrated control of other vectors of filariasis, arbovirus and malaria. Author Summary: Mosquito vectors that transmit filariasis and several arboviruses such as Rift Valley Fever, Chikungunya and O'Nyong nyong as well as malaria co-occur across tropical Africa. These diseases are co-endemic in most rural African countries where they are transmitted by the same mosquito vectors. The only control measure currently in widespread use is mass drug administration for filariasis. In this study, we used controlled experiments to evaluate the benefit of screening the main mosquito entry points into houses, namely, eaves, windows and doors. This study aims to illustrate the potential of screening specific house openings with the intention of preventing endophagic mosquitoes from entering houses and thus reducing contact between humans and vectors of neglected tropical diseases. This study confirms that while full house screening is effective for reducing indoor densities of Culex spp. mosquitoes, screening of eaves alone has a great potential for integrated control of neglected tropical diseases and malaria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Near-infrared spectroscopy as a complementary age grading and species identification tool for African malaria vectors.
- Author
-
Sikulu, Maggy, Killeen, Gerry F., Hugo, Leon E., Ryan, Peter A., Dowell, Kayla M., Wirtz, Robert A., Moore, Sarah J., and Dowell, Floyd E.
- Subjects
SPECTRUM analysis ,QUALITATIVE chemical analysis ,ANOPHELES gambiae ,ANOPHELES ,MALARIA ,PROTOZOAN diseases ,PARASITES ,DISEASE vectors ,INFECTIOUS disease transmission - Abstract
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was recently applied to age-grade and differentiate laboratory reared Anopheles gambiae sensu strico and Anopheles arabiensis sibling species of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato complex. In this study, we report further on the accuracy of this tool for simultaneously estimating the age class and differentiating the morphologically indistinguishable An. gambiae s.s. and An. arabiensis from semi-field releases and wild populations. Nine different ages (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16 d) of An. arabiensis and eight different ages (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 d) of An. gambiae s.s. maintained in 250 × 60 × 40 cm cages within a semi-field large-cage system and 105 wild-caught female An. gambiae s.l., were included in this study. NIRS classified female An. arabiensis and An. gambiae s.s. maintained in semi-field cages as <7 d old or ≥7 d old with 89% (n = 377) and 78% (n = 327) accuracy, respectively, and differentiated them with 89% (n = 704) accuracy. Wild caught An. gambiae s.l. were identified with 90% accuracy (n = 105) whereas their predicted ages were consistent with the expected mean chronological ages of the physiological age categories determined by dissections. These findings have importance for monitoring control programmes where reduction in the proportion of older mosquitoes that have the ability to transmit malaria is an important outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Establishment of a large semi-field system for experimental study of African malaria vector ecology and control in Tanzania.
- Author
-
Ferguson, Heather M., Ng'habi, Kija R., Walder, Thomas, Kadungula, Demetrius, Moore, Sarah J., Lyimo, Issa, Russell, Tanya L., Urassa, Honorathy, Mshinda, Hassan, Killeen, Gerry F., and Knols, Bart G. J.
- Subjects
MALARIA ,DISEASE vectors ,ANIMAL ecology ,VECTOR control ,PREVENTION of communicable diseases - Abstract
Background: Medical entomologists increasingly recognize that the ability to make inferences between laboratory experiments of vector biology and epidemiological trends observed in the field is hindered by a conceptual and methodological gap occurring between these approaches which prevents hypothesis-driven empirical research from being conducted on relatively large and environmentally realistic scales. The development of Semi-Field Systems (SFS) has been proposed as the best mechanism for bridging this gap. Semi-field systems are defined as enclosed environments, ideally situated within the natural ecosystem of a target disease vector and exposed to ambient environmental conditions, in which all features necessary for its life cycle completion are present. Although the value of SFS as a research tool for malaria vector biology is gaining recognition, only a few such facilities exist worldwide and are relatively small in size (< 100 m²). Methods: The establishment of a 625 m² state-of-the-art SFS for large-scale experimentation on anopheline mosquito ecology and control within a rural area of southern Tanzania, where malaria transmission intensities are amongst the highest ever recorded, is described. Results: A greenhouse frame with walls of mosquito netting and a polyethylene roof was mounted on a raised concrete platform at the Ifakara Health Institute. The interior of the SFS was divided into four separate work areas that have been set up for a variety of research activities including mass-rearing for African malaria vectors under natural conditions, high throughput evaluation of novel mosquito control and trapping techniques, short-term assays of host-seeking behaviour and olfaction, and longer-term experimental investigation of anopheline population dynamics and gene flow within a contained environment that simulates a local village domestic setting. Conclusion: The SFS at Ifakara was completed and ready for use in under two years. Preliminary observations indicate that realistic and repeatable observations of anopheline behaviour are obtainable within the SFS, and that habitat and climatic features representative of field conditions can be simulated within it. As work begins in the SFS in Ifakara and others around the world, the major opportunities and challenges to the successful application of this tool for malaria vector research and control are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. A low-cost repellent for malaria vectors in the Americas: results of two field trials in Guatemala and Peru.
- Author
-
Moore, Sarah J., Darling, Samuel T., Sihuincha, Moisés, Padilla, Norma, and Devine, Gregor J.
- Subjects
- *
MALARIA , *INSECT baits & repellents , *LEMONGRASS oil , *EVAPORATION (Chemistry) - Abstract
Background: The cost of mosquito repellents in Latin America has discouraged their wider use among the poor. To address this problem, a low-cost repellent was developed that reduces the level of expensive repellent actives by combining them with inexpensive fixatives that appear to slow repellent evaporation. The chosen actives were a mixture of para-menthane-diol (PMD) and lemongrass oil (LG). Methods: To test the efficacy of the repellent, field trials were staged in Guatemala and Peru. Repellent efficacy was determined by human-landing catches on volunteers who wore the experimental repellents, control, or 15% DEET. The studies were conducted using a balanced Latin Square design with volunteers, treatments, and locations rotated each night. Results: In Guatemala, collections were performed for two hours, commencing three hours after repellent application. The repellent provided >98% protection for five hours after application, with a biting pressure of >100 landings per person/hour. The 15% DEET control provided lower protection at 92% (p < 0.0001). In Peru, collections were performed for four hours, commencing two hours after repellent application. The PMD/LG repellent provided 95% protection for six hours after application with a biting pressure of >46 landings per person/hour. The 20% DEET control provided significantly lower protection at 64% (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In both locations, the PMD/LG repellent provided excellent protection up to six hours after application against a wide range of disease vectors including Anopheles darlingi. The addition of fixatives to the repellent extended its longevity while enhancing efficacy and significantly reducing its cost to malaria-endemic communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Correction to: Methods and indicators for measuring patterns of human exposure to malaria vectors.
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Moore, Sarah, Okumu, Fredros, Kiware, Samson, Lobo, Neil F., Koenker, Hannah, Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Gimnig, John, and Killeen, Gerry F.
- Subjects
- *
MALARIA - Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Measuring and characterizing night time human behaviour as it relates to residual malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the published literature.
- Author
-
Monroe, April, Moore, Sarah, Koenker, Hannah, Lynch, Matthew, and Ricotta, Emily
- Subjects
- *
MALARIA , *VECTOR control , *INSECTICIDES , *LANGUAGE & languages - Abstract
Background: Malaria cases and deaths decreased dramatically in recent years, largely due to effective vector control interventions. Persistence of transmission after good coverage has been achieved with high-quality vector control interventions, namely insecticide-treated nets or indoor residual spraying, poses a significant challenge to malaria elimination efforts. To understand when and where remaining transmission is occurring, it is necessary to look at vector and human behaviour, and where they overlap. To date, a review of human behaviour related to residual malaria transmission has not been conducted. Methods: Studies were identified through PubMed and Google Scholar. Hand searches were conducted for all references cited in articles identified through the initial search. The review was limited to English language articles published between 2000 and 2017. Publications with primary data from a malaria endemic setting in sub-Saharan Africa and a description of night time human behaviours were included. Results: Twenty-six publications were identified that met inclusion criteria. Study results fit into two broad categories: when and where people are exposed to malaria vectors and what people are doing at night that may increase their contact with malaria vectors. Among studies that quantified human-vector interaction, a majority of exposure occurred indoors during sleeping hours for unprotected individuals, with some variation across time, contexts, and vector species. Common night time activities across settings included household chores and entertainment during evening hours, as well as livelihood and large-scale socio-cultural events that can last throughout the night. Shifting sleeping patterns associated with travel, visitors, illness, farming practices, and outdoor sleeping, which can impact exposure and use of prevention measures, were described in some locations. Conclusions: While the importance of understanding human-vector interaction is well-established, relatively few studies have included human behaviour when measuring exposure to malaria vectors. Broader application of a standardized approach to measuring human-vector interaction could provide critical information on exposure across settings and over time. In-depth understanding of night time activities that occur during times when malaria vectors are active and barriers to prevention practices in different contexts should also be considered. This information is essential for targeting existing interventions and development and deployment of appropriate complementary prevention tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Malaria infection in mosquitoes decreases the personal protection offered by permethrin-treated bednets.
- Author
-
Thiévent, Kevin, Hofer, Lorenz, Rapp, Elise, Tambwe, Mgeni Mohamed, Moore, Sarah, and Koella, Jacob C.
- Subjects
MALARIA ,MOSQUITOES ,PERMETHRIN ,INSECTICIDE-treated mosquito nets ,PLASMODIUM berghei ,ANOPHELES arabiensis - Abstract
Background: Insecticides targeting adult mosquitoes are the main way of controlling malaria. They work not only by killing mosquitoes, but also by repelling and irritating them. Indeed their repellent action gives valuable personal protection against biting mosquitoes. In the context of malaria control this personal protection is especially relevant when mosquitoes are infectious, whereas to protect the community we would prefer that the mosquitoes that are not yet infectious are killed (so, not repelled) by the insecticide. As the infectious stage of malaria parasites increases the motivation of mosquitoes to bite, we predicted that it would also change their behavioural response to insecticides. Results: With two systems, a laboratory isolate of the rodent malaria
Plasmodium berghei infectingAnopheles gambiae and several isolates ofP. falciparum obtained from schoolchildren in Tanzania that infectedAnopheles arabiensis , we found that mosquitoes harbouring the infectious stage (the sporozoites) of the parasite were less repelled by permethrin-treated nets than uninfected ones. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, at least in the laboratory, malaria infection decreases the personal protection offered by insecticide-treated nets at the stage where the personal protection is most valuable. Further studies must investigate whether these results hold true in the field and whether the less effective personal protection can be balanced by increased community protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.