Search

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are routinely accompanied by peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis of the primary appendiceal tumor. In contrast, liver metastases and lymph node metastases are unusual. From an extensive database, patients with lymph node metastases identified at the time of primary appendiceal cancer resection were selected for special study. The clinical, treatment-related and histologic variables of this group of patients were statistically analyzed for their impact on overall survival. From a prospectively maintained database of 685 patients with a complete cytoreduction of a mucinous appendiceal neoplasm with peritoneal dissemination, 39 patients (5.6%) had lymph node metastases at the time of primary diagnosis. The median follow-up was 5.0 years and overall median survival was 6.0 years. Histologically, 6 of these patients (15.4%) had an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm – Intermediate type (MACA-Int). In 5 patients, the involved lymph nodes were not within the ileocolic lymph node group. The 7 patients (17.9%) who had a complete or near complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to definite cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) showed prolonged survival (HR 4.8 (1.1, 20.5) p = 0.0323). A prior right colon resection required repeat resection in 87% of patients. Long-term survival is unusual but occasionally seen in this group of patients. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important determinant of a favorable outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with colorectal cancer die as a result of metastases to liver, lymph nodes or the peritoneal surfaces. The primary is almost always controlled by colon or rectal cancer resection. Consecutive patients with isolated metastases to peritoneal surfaces (no lymph node, liver or systemic metastases) were referred to the Washington Cancer Institute from all over the United States and abroad. The study of this particular group of patients was to determine the impact of clinical and histologic features on overall survival. These variables were collected from the primary colorectal cancer resection performed at the referring institute and from the cytoreductive surgery (CRS) performed at the Washington Hospital Center. The data was prospectively accumulated and retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-one consecutive patients had a complete cytoreduction. This restricted cohort of patients was studied in an attempt to eliminate confounding variables. The median age was 47 years (range 19–80). There were 14 (45%) males. The median overall survival following CRS was 67.9 months with a 5-year and 10-year survival of 51.9% and 43.6%, respectively. None of the clinical or histologic features, including peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and presence of signet ring cells, significantly predicted survival except for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (p = 0.0033). None of the involved abdominopelvic regions predicted a guarded outcome. In this restricted group of lymph node negative colorectal PM patients with a complete cytoreduction, a high PCI or the presence of signet ring cells should not exclude patients from CRS and perioperative chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peritoneal metastases is the second most common colorectal cancer dissemination. The anatomic sites at which colorectal peritoneal metastases are located within the abdomen and pelvis has not been previously determined. A prospective database has been maintained on patients treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative chemotherapy. The patients in this current study all had peritoneal metastases histologically confirmed, and a complete cytoreduction. The patterns of dissemination of the peritoneal metastases recorded after a prior left colon resection or right colon resection at the time of the CRS were analyzed. The major goal was to identify the location of colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases at abdominopelvic anatomic sites. In these 77 patients, by the abdominopelvic regions, the highest incidence of histologically documented cancer was the pelvis (85.7%), central region (75.3%), right upper quadrant (50.6%) and right lower (53.2%). Specific anatomic sites free of disease at the time of primary resection at which cancer was documented at the time of CRS was the abdominal incision or laparoscopy port sites at 57.1% and the anatomic site for the primary cancer resection at 76.6%. Right colon cancer had a statistically significant increase in the right flank region 8 (p = 0.0350) and borderline significant increase of left colon cancer in the left lower region 5 (p = 0.0699). When data is pooled from many patients, physiology of the peritoneal spaces and tumor cell entrapment contribute to the distribution of disease within the abdomen and pelvis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A rare appendiceal malignancy is characterized by both glandular and neuroendocrine histology. It often presents with dissemination of the perforated tumor to peritoneal surfaces. Current treatments involve systemic chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The impact of clinical, histological and treatment-related characteristics on survival were evaluated and subjected to univariate statistical analyses. All patients had stage IV disease and were treated by a uniform treatment strategy. Survival was determined from onset of disease until death or most recent follow-up. There were 47 patients available for study of whom 17 were male. Median age was 48 with a range of 27–65. None or a single symptom vs. 2 or more symptoms had a significant effect on survival. Median survival of the entire cohort was 45 months and 34.88% and 8.72% of patients survived 5 and 10 years, respectively. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no impact on survival. Patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 0–20 as compared to PCI > 20 survived longer (p = 0.012). The survival of patients able to have a complete resection as compared to an incomplete resection of disease was significant (p = 0.0087). The type of perioperative chemotherapy did not alter survival. These data show that patients with a lesser extent of disease with a complete cytoreduction had an improved prognosis. No benefit from systemic or perioperative regional chemotherapy was apparent. With long-term follow-up, patients with the combined glandular and neuroendocrine histology exhibiting peritoneal metastases have a guarded prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peritoneal carcinomatosis may be diagnosed by cytology or CT-guided biopsy, but routine radiologic and endoscopic workup not reveal a primary site. The clinical condition is referred to as peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site. Over a 30-year time interval all patients treated with an initial diagnosis of carcinomatosis of unknown primary site were managed on a special clinical pathway. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy, and abdominal and pelvic CT were performed. Immunostains suggested a gastrointestinal origin of the carcinomatosis. After these tests, exploratory laparotomy was performed. Twenty-five patients fulfilled the criteria for peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site and all 25 of these patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Special attention to the anatomic site of the appendix occurred during the exploratory laparotomy. No site within the gastrointestinal tract including a non-cancerous appendix was observed in 9 patients (36%). In 7 patients (28%), the carcinomatosis was so extensive that an adequate exploration to determine a primary site was not possible. In a third group of 9 patients (36%), exploratory laparotomy revealed an occult appendiceal malignancy. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site was caused by an occult appendiceal adenocarcinoma in 36% of our patients. This error in diagnosis may lead to suboptimal treatment. Surgical exploration to visualize the anatomic site of the appendix should occur prior to making a definitive diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown primary site. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Peritoneal metastasis (PM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without distant spread are rare. The related prognosis is poor without standard treatment available. The role of cytoreduction surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly documented. Methods An international multicentric cohort was constituted by retrospective analysis of 21 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PM of HCC between 1992 and 2016 from 10 reference centers of PSOGI. Data on clinical features, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results The median time interval from the diagnosis of PM to the procedure was 4.5 months. The median peritoneal cancer index was 14. Sixteen patients had complete cytoreduction (CCR0-1). Ten patients had grades 3 to 4 complications. The median duration of follow-up was 52.2 months. The median OS was 46.7 months. The projected 3y-OS and 5y-OS were 88.9 and 49.4% respectively. The median OS for patients with CCR0-1 resection was not reached whereas it was 5.9 months for those with CCR2-3 resection after CRS (p = 0.0005). The median RFS was 26.3 months and projected RFS at 3 years of 36.5 months Three prognostic factors were associated with improved RFS in the univariate analysis: preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.0156), PCI >15 (p = 0.009), Number of chemotherapy agents used for HIPEC (p = 0.005). Conclusion CRS/HIPEC is a safe and effective approach in selected patients with PM of HCC. CRS/HIPEC gives the patient a chance for a good relapse free and overall survival and should be considered as an option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms have a pattern of metastases that is different from the other gastrointestinal cancers. The first site for cancer dissemination is the peritoneal space surrounding the primary tumor and this is followed by increasingly extensive peritoneal spread. Invasion of the psoas and iliacus muscle is an unusual phenomenon. Method: From a prospective database of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC), patients with psoas muscle invasion were reviewed. Their clinical features and treatments were tabulated. Results: Three patients with ages 33, 60, and 63 were identified. Two patients had disease progression into the psoas muscle 33 and 95 months after CRS plus HIPEC. One had dissecting mucinous tumor into psoas, iliacus and quadratus lumborum muscle at the time of diagnosis of the appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. All three survived at least five years from their initial treatment. Conclusion: Despite the fact that mucinous tumor invasion was outside the peritoneal cavity, long term benefit from psoas muscle resection with a mucinous appendiceal neoplasm is possible and resection possibly with HIPEC should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:During the Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy in Milan in 2008, a consensus was reached that contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) was the principal imaging modality for patients being evaluated for treatment of peritoneal metastases. This fact being accepted, the radiologic criteria for that may exclude patients from a high value cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been reliably determined. Methods:From a consensus of surgeons and radiologists, radiologic images were selected and their determinant radiologic characteristics described. The anatomic pathology causing the abnormal images were identified and characterised. The cytoreductive surgical procedures that may, in selected patients, result in a complete resection of the pathology identified were presented. Results:Radiographs of 15 CT images that cause concern when a patient is being evaluated for CRS were listed. The anatomic pathology these images define and possible surgical resections they require were reviewed. The surgical implications of the absence or presence of a single, or of multiple concerning CT features was extracted from the surgical and radiologic literature. Conclusions:There is a definite need to identify new pre-operative imaging parameters to define optimal indication of CRS with HIPEC. The presence of a single concerning radiologic feature is associated with the possibility of an adverse outcome or technically more complex resections associated with increased morbidity and mortality. If two or more of the concerning radiologic features are described from the CT, suboptimal cytoreduction will usually occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim:The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients operated on for peritoneal metastases from unusual cancer sites of origin, meaning apart from peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal, gastric and epithelial ovarian carcinomas, pseudomyxoma peritonei and mesothelioma. Patients and methods:A questionnaire concerning patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for PM arising from unusual cancer sites of origin was sent to all centres, which routinely performed HIPEC, through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International and the RENAPE network. Results:Between September 1990 and June 2016, 850 procedures for unusual cases were performed in 781 patients, in 53 centres worldwide. Nearly two-thirds of the procedures were performed for three indications: rare ovarian carcinoma (n = 224), sarcoma (n = 189) and neuroendocrine tumours (n = 127). The median PCI was 12 [0–39]. Grade III–IV postoperative complications occurred in 272 patients (41%). Nineteen patients (2.9%) died postoperatively. After a median follow-up of 46 months, median overall survival (OS) was 39 months [33.18–44.05]. Five-year OS rate was 38.7%. For the three main indications, 5-year OS was significantly greater in patients with PM from rare ovarian carcinoma (57.7%), than that of patients with PM from neuroendocrine tumours (39.9%), and from sarcoma (29.3%) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions:CRS and HIPEC appear to be safe and effective in patients with peritoneal metastases from unusual cancer sites of origin, especially from rare ovarian carcinomas, PM from neuroendocrine tumours. The respective roles of CRS and HIPEC remain unclear and should be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM. Materials and methods:The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised. Results:The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC groupvs.5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC groupvs.7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC. Conclusions:The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The peritoneal surface remains an important failure site for patients with gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. During the last 2 decades, novel therapeutic approaches, combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative intracavitary and intravenous chemotherapy, have emerged for peritoneal carcinomatosis patients. This has resulted in remarkable clinical successes in contrast with prior failures. Although further clinical data from phase II and III trials supporting this combined treatment protocols are necessary, an optimalization of the wide variety of different perioperative cancer chemotherapy protocols used in these treatment regimens is equally important. To this date, a clear understanding of the pharmacology of perioperative chemotherapy is still lacking. The efficacy of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapy protocols is governed as much by nonpharmacokinetic variables (tumor nodule size, density, vascularity, interstitial fluid pressure, and binding) as by the pharmacokinetic variables (dose, volume, duration, pressure, and carrier solution). Our recent data support the importance of the tumor nodule as the most meaningful pharmacologic end point. Timing of perioperative intravenous chemotherapy may substantially influence the pharmacokinetics. This review aims to clarify the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data currently available regarding the intraperitoneal delivery of cancer chemotherapy agents in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Use of regional chemotherapy in addition to cytoreductive surgery in patients with established gastric cancer peritoneal metastases should have limited expectations for an improved outcome. 10.1245/s10434-016-5306-0 4 Bonnot P.E., Piessen G., Kepenekian V., Decullier E., Pocard M., Meunier B., Bereder J.M., Abboud K., Marchal F., Quenet F. Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A propensity score analysis. Common knowledge would suggest that regional treatments for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer would not be successful. [Extracted from the article]

The authors focus on the emergence of a combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a standard of care for colorectal and appendiceal malignancy. An overview of the first meeting of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International held at the Royal College of Surgeons in London, England in 1998 is offered. Also mentioned is the development in efforts to develop centers of excellence for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis in the U.S.

The author reflects on the article by Akaishi and colleagues titled "Peritonectomy for peritoneal carcinomatosis: long-term outcomes from a single Brazilian institution," which discusses treatment strategies for patients with carcinomatosis. He congratulates the authors for their work at Hospital Sirio Libanes in São Paulo, Brazil, and calls on others professionals to follow their example and conduct research in treating carcinomatosis throughout South America.