Search

Current therapies for Head and Neck cancer treatment are extremely advanced. Though, they cause oral complications which have deleterious effects on basic life functions, affect oral and overall health, may lead to significant morbidity and treatment discontinuation and have an impact on survivorship and quality of life. As new therapies are introduced, a new spectrum of oral complications is rising, compromising the mucosal integrity and the salivary function, that may not be recognized, reported and treated properly. Oral complications, often permanent and extremely painful, may include mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia, infections, trismus and fibrosis, risk of dental disease and necrosis of the jaw, neurosensory disorders and when targeted therapies and immunotherapy are involved, aphthoid and lichenoid lesions can also be reported. Increased awareness is required for the prevention and management of these complications, which can be best provided by a multidisciplinary team.

Objectives Neuropathic pain (NP) is a complex condition that impairs the patients’ quality of life. Registries are useful tools, increasingly used as they provide high-quality data. This article aims to describe the Greek Neuropathic Pain Registry (Gr.NP.R.) design, the patients’ baseline data, and real-world treatment outcomes. Methods The Gr.NP.R. collects electronically, stores, and shares real-world clinical data from Pain and Palliative Care centers in Greece. It is a web-based application, which ensures security, simplicity, and transparency. VAS, DN4, and Pain Detect were used for pain and NP assessment. Results From 2016 to 2020, 5980 patients with chronic pain, of cancer or non-cancer origin, were examined and 2334 fulfilled the NP inclusion criteria (VAS > 5, DN4 > 4, and Pain Detect >= 19). At the first visit, the mean age was 64.8 years, 65.5% were female patients, and 97.9% were Greek. The mean (SD) time from pain initiation to visiting the pain clinics was 1.5 (3.8) years. Most patients were undertreated. Following the patients’ registration, the national guidelines were implemented. The majority of the prescribed medications were gabapentinoids (70.2%), especially pregabalin (62.6%), and opioids (tramadol, 55.3%). At visits 1 and 6, mean VAS was 7.1 and 5, and mean DN4 score was 5.6 and 3.5, respectively. Conclusions The Gr.NP.R. provides information on the demographics, clinical progress, treatment history, treatment responses, and the drugs of choice for patients with cancer and non-cancer NP. The collected data may help physicians plan the management of their patients.

Purpose: The Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) represents a diagnostic tool concerning patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The application of such a tool in the Greek clinical praxis requires validation. Methods: Validation consists of three stages - translation, reverse translation, and patient application. Hundred oncologic patients were assessed by comparing the PNQ to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) at the chemotherapy onset and second, fourth, and sixth sessions. The diagnostic tool’s specific requirements (compliance, validity, concordance, sensitivity, specificity, reliability) were statistically evaluated. Results: Differences between translated texts and between the reverse translation and the original were considered negligible. At the second, fourth, and sixth session compliance was 98%, 95%, and 93% while Cronbach’s a was 0,57 0,69, and 0,81, respectively. Cohen’s weighted. was 0,67 and 0,58, Spearman’s. was 0,7 and 0,98, while the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was 1 and 0,9 for the sensory and the motor part, respectively. The variance’s linear regression analysis confirmed CIPN worsening over time (P

Current therapies for Head and Neck cancer treatment are extremely advanced. Though, they cause oral complications which have deleterious effects on basic life functions, affect oral and overall health, may lead to significant morbidity and treatment discontinuation and have an impact on survivorship and quality of life. As new therapies are introduced, a new spectrum of oral complications is rising, compromising the mucosal integrity and the salivary function, that may not be recognized, reported and treated properly. Oral complications, often permanent and extremely painful, may include mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia, infections, trismus and fibrosis, risk of dental disease and necrosis of the jaw, neurosensory disorders and when targeted therapies and immunotherapy are involved, aphthoid and lichenoid lesions can also be reported. Increased awareness is required for the prevention and management of these complications, which can be best provided by a multidisciplinary team. © 2021 Maria Kouri et al., published by Sciendo 2021.

Introduction: Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is defined as the neuropathic pain that arises either acutely or in the chronic phase of a cerebrovascular event and is a result of central lesions of the somatosensory tract. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the prevalence of CPSP, to describe its characteristics, and to discuss the associated management challenges. Methods: After a systematic Medline search, we identified 69 papers eligible to be included. Results: The pooled prevalence of CPSP in patients with stroke at any location was 11% (95% CI 7–18%), which can increase to more than 50% in the subgroups of patients with medullary or thalamic strokes. CPSP onset coincides with stroke occurrence in 26% of patients (95% CI 18–35%); CPSP manifests within a month since symptom onset in 31% of patients (95% CI 22–42%), and occurs between the first month and the first year in 41% of patients (95% CI 33.9–49.0%). CPSP develops more than 12 months after stroke onset in 5% of patients (95% CI 3–8%). Conclusions: Clinicians should look for any evidence of central neuropathic pain for at least 12 months after stroke. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can be used for the management of CPSP. Lamotrigine has the strongest evidence (Level II of evidence, derived from small randomized controlled trials) for being effective in the management of CPSP. Future research should focus on well-designed trials of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions aiming to relief CPSP, which is a very common but often neglected pain syndrome. © 2020, The Author(s).

Background: The Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (CPGQ) was developed to assess the global severity of chronic pain based on pain intensity and pain-related disability. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Greek version of the CPGQ (CPGQ-Gr). Methods: Adaptation into Greek followed established guidelines. We invited orthopedic outpatients suffering from chronic hip pain to participate in the study. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the CPGQ-Gr were assessed. Results: Factor analysis yielded two factors (subscales), disability score (DS) and characteristic pain intensity (CPI). CPGQ-Gr items, total and subscale scores were highly correlated with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component summary score, and slightly correlated or not correlated with the SF-12 mental component summary score. Cronbach’s alpha correlation coefficients for the CPGQ-Gr total scale, DS, and CPI subscales were 0.90, 0.95, and 0.83 respectively. All measures showed excellent temporal stability (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.84, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively). Cliff’s delta effect sizes ranged from 0.47 to 0.82. The values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were consistent with good to excellent discriminatory ability (range: 0.747-0.902). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the Greek version of the CPGQ is a valid, reliable, and sensitive to changes, instrument for grading the severity of chronic hip pain. HIPPOKRATIA 2018, 22(1): 37-42.

Background and Aim: The Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) is a brief, simple, and straightforward self-administered questionnaire that was developed by Perrot et al. for the detection of fibromyalgia syndrome in patients with diffuse chronic pain. The aim of our study was to develop and validate the Greek version of FiRST. Methods: The study was set up as a prospective observational study. The original French version of FiRST was adapted into Greek using forward and backward translation. Patients with chronic diffuse pain with a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis based on the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology were invited to participate to the study. Results: Of the 101 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 42 were diagnosed with fibromyalgia and 59 with osteoarthritis. The 2 groups did not differ significantly regarding gender and pain characteristics (duration, intensity). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 89% (95% confidence interval = 83 to 95%; SE: 0.032, P

Fibromyalgia is characterized by widespread pain, sleep problems, fatigue, functional impairment, psychological distress, and cognitive dysfunction. The objective of this meta-analysis is to synthesize the available data on the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions across all domains included in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT-10) fibromyalgia response definitions, and to examine response based on these definitions. We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and the reference lists of articles for randomized controlled trials of any drug formulation or non-pharmacological intervention used for fibromyalgia treatment. We extracted efficacy data regarding pain, sleep, physical function, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and cognition. The available data were insufficient to draw definite conclusions regarding response. Indirect evidence indicates that it may be expected with the use of serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), and multidisciplinary treatment. © 2015, International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).

Background and Aims: Regional anesthesia (RA) techniques (central neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks [CNBs and PNBs]) are well-established anesthesia/analgesia modalities. However, information on their nationwide use is sparse. The aim of the survey was to assess the utility of RA techniques in Greece, during 2011. Materials and Methods: A nationwide, cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted (March to June, 2012), using a structured questionnaire that was sent to 128 Greek Anesthesia Departments. Results: Sixty-six completed questionnaires (response rate 51.56%) were analyzed. The data corresponded to 187,703 operations and represented all hospital categories and geographical regions of Greece. On the whole, RA was used in 45.5% of performed surgical procedures (85,386/187,703). Spinal anesthesia was the technique of choice (51.9% of all RA techniques), mostly preferred in orthopedics (44.8%). Epidural anesthesia/analgesia (application rate of 23.2%), was mostly used in obstetrics and gynecology (50.4%). Combined spinal-epidural and PNBs were less commonly instituted (11.24% and 13.64% of all RA techniques, respectively). Most PNBs (78.5%) were performed with a neurostimulator, while elicitation of paresthesia was used in 16% of the cases. Conversely, ultrasound guidance was quite limited (5%). The vast majority of consultant anesthesologists (94.49%) were familiar with CNBs, whereas only 46.4% were familiar with PNBs. The main reported limitations to RA application were lack of equipment (58.23%) and inadequate education/training (49.29%). Conclusion: Regional modalities were routinely used by Greek anesthesiologists during 2011. Neuraxial blocks, especially spinal anesthesia, were preferred over PNBs. The underutilization of certain RA techniques was attributed to lack of equipment and inadequate training.

Objective: Pain is one of the most undertreated medical complaints, with barriers to effective pain management lying in poor education of health professionals and misconceptions regarding patients in pain. The aim of this study was to assess whether an elective undergraduate course on chronic pain offered in Greek medical schools influences knowledge and attitudes of medical undergraduates about chronic pain and helps them clarify pain-related concepts. Methods: An electronic questionnaire with 6 demographic and 21 pain-related items was uploaded on SurveyMonkey. The questionnaire was open to medical students in every Greek medical school for 1 month. Students were asked to respond to questions regarding various aspects of pain taught in the aforementioned course. In specific, they were asked to respond to questions regarding the definition, types, and adequacy of treatment of chronic cancer and non-cancer pain. They were queried about their knowledge of pain clinics, health practitioners who run them, and types of treatment available there. There were also questions about opioid use in cancer and non-cancer chronic pain patients and regarding the likelihood of opioid addiction. Results: According to their responses, medical students had good knowledge about the definition and consequences of pain, and those who attended the pain course had greater knowledge regarding the adequacy of treatment of chronic pain and were more familiar with the recent classification of types of pain. Students who did not have exposure to the undergraduate pain course had little information regarding pain clinics and had poor knowledge regarding the use of opioids in cancer and in nonmalignant chronic pain. All students expressed concerns regarding addiction to opioids. Conclusions: Although students enter medical school with little knowledge about pain issues, pain awareness can be positively influenced by education. A curriculum about pain should not only teach the basic science of pain but also present treatment strategies available and address the socio-emotional dimensions of pain. Additionally, if misconceptions about opioid use and addiction are properly elucidated early in medical education, the future health practitioners will be one step forward in achieving the goal of alleviating suffering patients' pain. © 2015 American Academy of Pain Medicine.

Background: The Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) was developed by the French Neuropathic Pain Group and is a simple and objective tool, primarily designed to screen for neuropathic pain. The aim of our study is to validate the DN4 in the Greek language. Methods: The study was set up as a prospective observational study. Two pain specialists independently examined patients and diagnosed them with neuropathic, nociceptive, or mixed pain, according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definitions. A third and a fourth physician administered the DN4 questionnaire to the patients. Results: Out of the 237 patients who met our inclusion criteria and had identical diagnoses regarding the type of pain, 123 were diagnosed with neuropathic, 59 with nociceptive, and 55 with mixed pain. Among patients with identical diagnoses of neuropathic or nociceptive pain, using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92. A cutoff point of equal or greater than 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 78%. Among patients suffering from pain with neuropathic element (neuropathic or mixed pain) or pain with no neuropathic element (nociceptive pain), using a ROC curve analysis, the AUC was 0.89. A cutoff point of equal or greater than 4 resulted in a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 78%. Conclusion: The Greek version of DN4 is a valid tool for discriminating between neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions in daily practice. © 2015 World Institute of Pain.

Objectives: Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is a common manifestation of cancer and/or its treatment. Treatment following the WHO analgesic ladder provides relief for the majority of cancer pain patients; however, concern remains that opioids may be less efficacious for neuropathic pain (NP) compared with nociceptive pain, often necessitating the use of higher doses. Adjuvants, such as pregabalin, have shown to be efficacious for the treatment of NP, although data come mostly from noncancer studies. The comparative efficacy and safety of opioids versus adjuvants has not been studied for NCP. The aim of this study was to directly compare pregabalin versus a strong opioid for the treatment of NCP. Methods: A total of 120 patients, diagnosed with "definite" NCP, were randomized into two groups and received increasing doses of either oral pregabalin or transdermal fentanyl for 28 days. VAS score, patient satisfaction, need for opioid rescue, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: In the pregabalin group, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved at least 30% reduction in VAS compared with the fentanyl group (73.3%, 95% CI: 60.3%-83.93 vs. 36.7%, 95% CI: 24.5%-50.1%, P

Little is known of cancer rehabilitation needs in Europe. EUROCHIP-3 organised a group of experts to propose a list of population-based indicators used for describing cancer rehabilitation across Europe. The aim of this study is to present and discuss these indicators. A EUROCHIP-3 expert panel reached agreement on two types of indicators. (a) Cancer prevalence indicators. These were proposed as a means of characterising the burden of cancer rehabilitation needs by time from diagnosis and patient health status. These indicators can be estimated from cancer registry data or by collecting data on follow-up and treatments for samples of cases archived in cancer registries. (b) Indicators of rehabilitation success. These include: return to work, quality of life, and satisfaction of specific rehabilitation needs. Studies can be performed to estimate these indicators in individual countries, but to obtain comparable data across European countries it will be necessary to administer a questionnaire to randomly selected samples of patients from population-based cancer registry databases. However, three factors complicate questionnaire studies: patients may not be aware that they have cancer; incomplete participation in surveys could lead to bias; and national confidentiality laws in some cases prohibit cancer registries from approaching patients. Although these studies are expensive and difficult to perform, but as the number of cancer survivors increases, it is important to document their needs in order to provide information on cancer control. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Exposure to various types of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) affects pain specificity (nociception) and pain inhibition (analgesia). Previous study of ours has shown that exposure to the resonant spectra derived from biologically active substances' NMR may induce to live targets the same effects as the substances themselves. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential analgesic effect of the resonant EMFs derived from the NMR spectrum of morphine. Twenty five Wistar rats were divided into five groups: control group; intraperitoneal administration of morphine 10 mg/kg body wt; exposure of rats to resonant EMFs of morphine; exposure of rats to randomly selected non resonant EMFs; and intraperitoneal administration of naloxone and simultaneous exposure of rats to the resonant EMFs of morphine. Tail Flick and Hot Plate tests were performed for estimation of the latency time. Results showed that rats exposed to NMR spectrum of morphine induced a significant increase in latency time at time points (p < 0.05), while exposure to the non resonant random EMFs exerted no effects. Additionally, naloxone administration inhibited the analgesic effects of the NMR spectrum of morphine. Our results indicate that exposure of rats to the resonant EMFs derived from the NMR spectrum of morphine may exert on animals similar analgesic effects to morphine itself. © 2012 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP), commonly encountered in clinical practice, may be cancer-related, namely resulting from nervous system tumor invasion, surgical nerve damage during tumor removal, radiation-induced nerve damage and chemotherapy-related neuropathy, or may be of benign origin, unrelated to cancer. A neuropathic component is evident in about 1/3 of cancer pain cases. Although from a pathophysiological perspective NCP may differ from chronic neuropathic pain (NP), such as noncancer-related pain, clinical practice, and limited publications have shown that these two pain entities may share some treatment modalities. For example, co-analgesics have been well integrated into cancer pain-management strategies and are often used as First-Line options for the treatment of NCP. These drugs, including antidepressants and anticonvulsants, are recommended by evidence-based guidelines, whereas, others such as lidocaine patch 5%, are supported by randomized, controlled, clinical data and are included in guidelines for restricted conditions treatment. The vast majority of these drugs have already been proven useful in the management of benign NP syndromes. Treatment decisions for patients with NP can be difficult. The intrinsic difficulties in performing randomized controlled trials in cancer pain have traditionally justified the acceptance of drugs already known to be effective in benign NP for the management of malignant NP, despite the lack of relevant high quality data. Interest in NCP mechanisms and pharmacotherapy has increased, resulting in significant mechanism-based treatment advances for the future. In this comprehensive review, we present the latest knowledge regarding NCP pharmacological management. © 2011 The Authors. Pain Practice © 2011 World Institute of Pain.

Background and Objectives: Numerous controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The objectives of the present study were to assess the impact of pregabalin under real-world conditions on pain, pain-related sleep interference and general well-being, and to assess the tolerability and safety of pregabalin in patients diagnosed with neuropathic pain of central or peripheral origin. Methods: This was a non-interventional, multicentre study in which pregabalin was administered for 8 weeks, at the therapeutic dosages of 150600mg/day, to patients with a diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Pain intensity and pain-related sleep interference were measured using 11-point numerical rating scales, while well-being was assessed by documenting how often emotions associated with anxiety or depression were felt over the past week. Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC) were assessed at the final visit. Results: In the 668 patients included in the full analysis set, there were significant (p < 0.0001) reductions in mean pain and pain-related sleep interference scores of 4.16 and 4.02, respectively. Indicators of general well-being showed improvement from baseline to final visit. The majority of patients were rated as much improved (43.7% and 36.7%) or very much improved (24.0% and 26.2%) on CGIC and PGIC scores, respectively. Discontinuation because of lack of efficacy occurred in 0.7% of 691 patients in the safety analysis set while discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 5.1% of this population; 76.4% continued treatment after the study ended. Conclusion: Significant reductions in pain and pain-related sleep interference, combined with reductions in feelings of anxiety and depression, suggest that pregabalin under real-world conditions improves the overall health and wellbeing of patients with neuropathic pain. © 2011 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.