Search

Background: Capecitabine is frequently used alone or combined with other chemotherapy agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in relapsed patients. Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of capecitabine monotherapy versus combination in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxane. Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and safety of capecitabine alone compared to capecitabine combination were systematically searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and grades 3–4 drug-related adverse events were the outcomes assessed. Results: A total of 6,714 patients of 9 trials were involved in the pooled analysis. Our findings demonstrated that capecitabine combination is significantly superior to capecitabine monotherapy in improving PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13–1.54, p < 0.0001) and ORR (risk ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.83, p < 0.001), but it was insignificant in OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.98–1.22, p = 0.12). On the other hand, the incidence of non-hematological adverse events such as hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea was lower in capecitabine combination compared to capecitabine monotherapy. Conclusion: Capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy showed superiority over capecitabine monotherapy in terms of PFS and ORR, with no significant difference in OS. Non-hematological adverse effects such as hand-foot syndrome were fewer with a combination regimen. However, hematological adverse events were fewer with capecitabine monotherapy regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the various types of drug-related problems (DRPs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among chronic disease patients in a rural region of North Cyprus. Methods: A cross-sectional study of patients visiting a rural community pharmacy in North Cyprus was conducted. Patient demographic information, quality of life (QoL), laboratory data, adherence, and beliefs about medicine were assessed using standardized tools. Drug-related problems were evaluated using PCNE V.9.1. Results: Among the 200 screened participants, 97 fulfilled the enrollment criteria and were interviewed. The median age of the participants was 62 years (interquartile range = 15), with 58.8 % women. Only 54 % of hypertensive (HTN) patients reached their target blood pressure level. Over 40 % of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients failed to achieve their target HbA1c level. The majority (71 %) of patients with HTN, T2DM or coronary artery disease were not compliant with lifestyle recommendations and 86.6 % had = 1 DRP. Insufficient dosing and inappropriate indication for a drug were the DRPs associated with failure to achieve target and inappropriate drugs was the DRP type mostly associated with lower quality of life scores. Other factors associated with lower QoL levels included female gender, unemployment status, and high agreement with the statement "medications do more harm than good". Conclusion: Drug related problems and non-adherence are prevalent, while therapy targets are rarely met in rural Cyprus. Community pharmacists have the potential to improve outcomes in the management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Community pharmacists' roles have expanded and undergone a significant transition over the last few years. Consequently, new and different pharmacy services, such as drive-thru pharmacy services, have emerged. Drive-thru pharmacy services began three decades ago and continued even during outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients' perceptions are essential to the successful implementation and satisfaction with any new service. This study examines the reliability and validity of the assessment tool of public perceptions toward drive-thru community pharmacy services in Malaysia during COVID-19., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The developed tool consists of 28 items to evaluate believed advantages toward drive-thru community pharmacy services, believed disadvantages toward drive-thru community pharmacy services, differences between drive-thru community pharmacy services and instore drug refill services, perceptions toward drive-thru community pharmacy services and feelings regarding how the introduction of drive-thru pharmacy services may affect the image of community pharmacists. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to identify the factors of the developed tool, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the model fitness., Results: The EFA identified five elements and 25 items for the tool, and through CFA results, the observed model of the 25 items structure of the tool was verified as an excellent fit for the data [χ 2 (265, N = 565) = 819.586, p < 0.001, IFI = 0.931, CFI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.064]. The results of the CFA indicated a good model fit between the observed model and the proposed model. The internal reliability of the entire tool and each factor was very satisfactory as Cronbach's Alpha for the whole structured tool was 0.843 and for each factor was as follows, first factor (believed advantages) = 0.909, second factor (believed disadvantages) = 0.921, third factor (differences between drive-thru and instore refill) = 0.647, fourth factor (perceptions) = 0.926, and fifth factor (feelings) = 0.681., Conclusion: The developed and validated tool would be valuable for assessing the public's perceptions of the drive-thru community pharmacy service during COVID-19 and future pandemics., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Ababneh, Ong, Alsaloumi and Hussain.)